The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Three slits, each separated from its neighbor by d = 0.06 mm, are illuminated by a coherent light source of wavelength 550 nm. The slits are extremely narrow. A screen is located L = 2.5 m from the slits. The intensity on the centerline is 0.05 W. Consider a location on the screen x = 1.72 cm from the centerline. a) Draw the phasors, according to the phasor model for the addition of harmonic waves, appropriate for this location. b) From the phasor diagram, calculate the intensity of light at this location.

A Jamin interferometer is a device for measuring or for comparing the indices of refraction of gases. A beam of monochromatic light is split into two parts, each of which is directed along the axis of a separate cylindrical tube before being recombined into a single beam that is viewed through a telescope. Suppose we are given the following, • Length of each tube is L = 0.4 m. • λ= 598 nm. Both tubes are initially evacuated, and constructive interference is observed in the center of the field of view. As air is slowly let into one of the tubes, the central field of view changes dark and back to bright a total of 198 times. (a) What is the index of refraction for air? (b) If the fringes can be counted to ±0.25 fringe, where one fringe is equivalent to one complete cycle of intensity variation at the center of the field of view, to what accuracy can the index of refraction of air be determined by this experiment?

1. An arrangement of three charges is shown below where q₁ = 1.6 × 10-19 C, q2 = -1.6×10-19 C, and q3 3.2 x 10-19 C. 2 cm Y 93 92 91 X 3 cm (a) Calculate the magnitude and direction of the net force on q₁. (b) Sketch the direction of the forces on qi

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Answer 6

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Answer 7

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Answer 12

Ch. 4 - Prob. 1Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 2Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 3Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 4Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 5Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 6Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 7Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 8Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 9Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 10Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Concept explainers

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Answer to Problem 1Q

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 4 Solutions