Concept explainers
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY • DRAW IT As a consequence of size alone, larger organisms tend to have larger brains than smaller organisms. However, some organisms have brains that are considerably larger than expected for their size. There are high energetic costs associated with the development and mainte- nance of brains that are large relative to body size.
- (a) The fossil record documents trends in which brains that are large relative to body size evolved in certain lineages, including hominins. In such lineages, what can you infer about the costs and benefits of large brains?
- (b) Hypothesize how natural selection might favor the evolution of large brains despite their high maintenance costs.
- (c) Data for 14 bird species are listed below. Graph the data, placing deviation from expected brain size on the x-axis and mortality rate 011 the y-axis. What can you conclude about the relationship between brain size and mortality?
Deviation from Expected Brain Size* | -2.4 | -2.1 | -2.0 | -1.8 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Mortality Rate | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Learn your wayIncludes step-by-step video
Chapter 34 Solutions
Campbell Biology, Books a la Carte Plus Mastering Biology with eText -- Access Card Package (10th Edition)
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Human Anatomy & Physiology
Brock Biology of Microorganisms (15th Edition)
Fundamentals of Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Microbiology: An Introduction (13th Edition)
Becker's World of the Cell (9th Edition)
Study Guide for Campbell Biology
- We are sure that our closest living relatives are chimpanzees. There is a saying that that humans evolved from chimpanzees. Explain why this is not an accurate view of human evolution. In your answer: • be sure to indicate what misconceptions about evolution this view illustrates, and explain why there are physical similarities and differences between humans and chimpanzees (do NOT list the differences, just explain why/how they exist).arrow_forwardMammals have a particularly good sense of earing thanks to their inner ear which includes three tiny bones. Reptiles, in contrast, have a single inner ear bone. The lower jaw of reptiles is composed of multiple bones while the lower jaw of mammals is a single bone. Fossil and developmental evidence indicate that the inner ear bones of mammals evolved from lower jawbones. This suggests that the inner ear bones of mammals are 1. an analogy 2. an exaptation 3. a living fossil 4. a transitional trait 5. a vestigial structurearrow_forwardPART II. COMPARATIVE ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY EVIDENCE > Using the information in the Reading file part Il and textbook reading, answer the following questions: 1. Whales possess vestigial organs in the form of pelvic girdle and hind limb bones. How would you explain this? Page 3 of 6 Evolution Lab Exercise Report (by Dr. Lapik) 2. How can you explain that, while forelimbs of bats and human arms are used for vastly different purposes, they do have similar anatomy? 3. How would you explain the presence of gill slits in embryos of animals that do not form gills?arrow_forward
- 1. There are two main groups of bats: Smaller “microbats” navigate by using sonar, and larger “megabats” rely on vision. Mammalogists once thought that both kinds of bats evolve from insectivorous mammals. But similarities between the visual systems of megabats and primates have led some researchers to think that megabats may have evolved from primates, perhaps lemurs. What results would support the hypothesis that the two groups of bats have a common origin? Separate origins?arrow_forwardEyes are often used in arguments for intelligent design because many consider this organ to be too complex to have evolved by chance alone. However, complex lensed eyes evolved independently both within cephalod mollusks and vertebrates including our own ancestor. In the evolution of these structures the corresponding phylogenies revealed that both: A) were preceded by the evolution of 'simple' light sensing eyes, thus having adaptive intermediate evolutionary steps. B) lacked intermediate evolutionary steps involving the evolution of 'simple' eyes. C) had intermediate evolutionary steps, but ultimately the vertebrate eye had a superior 'design' without any kind of blind spot, relative to the simple invertebrate cephalopod eye. D) were preceded by vestigial non-functional optic structures.arrow_forwardAnthropologyarrow_forward
- 35.arrow_forwardMost animals show derived characteristics (character states) that differentiate them from their common ancestor (ancestral character state). However, evolution can also move in reverse, involving the change of a derived character state back to an ancestral state. Provide two examples from invertebrates of such ‘reverse evolution’ from a derived state (specialized state) back to a more ancestral character state. Make sure to use examples provided in this class. Provide two examples from invertebrates of such ‘reverse evolution’ from a derived state (specialized state) back to a more ancestral character state. Make sure to use examples provided in this class.arrow_forwardDiscuss 4 anatomical changes that occurred in the bipedal hominin and how they reflect certain habitat adaptations, and then discuss the hypotheses that propose why the change occurred.arrow_forward
- Assume that you discovered Caenorhabditis elegans that crawl significantly slower than others. How would you determine whether this behavior was due to an injury from the environment or to an inherited trait? A goal of using animal models is to explain the molecular detail of specific behaviors encoded in the human brain. How would you compare the developmental biology experiments on memory and learning using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as evidence about the evolution of a human behavior?arrow_forwardPut the following milestones in animal evolution in orderfrom oldest to most recent: (a) origin of mammals,(b) earliest evidence of terrestrial arthropods, (c) Ediacaranfauna, (d) extinction of large, nonflying dinosaurs.arrow_forwardEvolutionary biologist Neil Shubin once said, "In one sense, evolution didn't invent anything new? It's using the old to make the new, and we call that tinkering." How does the concept of the evolution of the complex eye and the idea of exaptations support Dr. Shubin's statement? Explain and give an example.arrow_forward
- Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781305389892Author:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillanPublisher:Cengage LearningBiology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781337392938Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. BergPublisher:Cengage Learning