EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337516051
Author: Miller
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 22, Problem 4BCP
Summary Introduction
Case s ummary : The Labor unions L, L 578 and company SS jointly agreed to a collective bargaining agreement which mandated all employees to pay the dues to the union. A person S worked for the SS but did not pay any union dues. When the union forced SS to terminate S, then the person agreed to pay his dues. However, the union still demanded his discharge, and the company S fired him.
To f ind : The involvement of L in unfair labor practices.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
The union (Union) member-employees of the Erie Resistor Company (Company) struck Company over the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement that was being negotiated between Company and Union. Company continued production operations during the strike by hiring new hires and crossover union members who were persuaded to abandon the strike and come back to work. Company promised all replacement workers super seniority. This would take the form of adding twenty years to the length of a worker’s actual service for the purpose of future layoffs and recalls. Many union members accepted the offer. Union filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Is Company’s offer of the super seniority lawful? Explain your answer.
Case6 Therien, an independent contractor, operated a trucking business. He drove one truck and hired drivers to operate the others. Therien was engaged in the business for several years and has been doing business with City Construction Company. Teamsters is a trade union within the definition of that expression in the Labour Relations Act. The City Construction Company entered into a collective agreement with the Teamsters’ Union requiring, as one of its terms, that all employees be union members. Therien agreed then to hire only union members for the operation of his truck. However, he declined to join the union personally because he wished to maintain his relation as an independent contractor in dealing with City Construction. He further claimed that, in the capacity of an employer in his own right, he was forbidden by the Labour Relation Code from participating in union activities. The union opposed his view, and because of the union’s threat to picket the City Construction, the…
A former Google worker sued the tech giant and the online staffing firm oDesk (now part of Upwork, a global freelancing platform) alleging that he and others were misclassified as independent contractors rather than Google employees. According to the suit, the employee was paid as an independent contractor through oDesk and assigned projects that were impossible for him to complete in the maximum 30 hours per week that he was authorized to bill. This forced him to work additional hours on his own time, without the benefit of overtime pay to which he was legally entitled to under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Google also provided the worker with a mobile phone, tablet, and laptop computer while he worked at Google offices in New York. Google further required that the worker use Google proprietary software and conform to the employee code of conduct in regards to absenteeism, blogging, and dress code. The worker complained about nonpayment of the additional work hours and attempted to…
Chapter 22 Solutions
EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- T.W.E., a large manufacturer, prohibited its employees from distributing union leaflets to other employees while on the company’s property. Richard, an employee of T.W.E., disregarded the prohibition and passed out the leaflets before his work shift began. T.W.E. discharged Richard for his actions. Has T.W.E. committed an unfair labor practice? Explain.arrow_forwardFurther in 1949, Congress amended the Fair Labor Standards Act (which regulates overtime) to read, “the hours for which an employee is employed, there shall be excluded any time spent in changing clothes or washing at the beginning or the end of each workday.”This law excluded “changing clothes” from compensable time, but is also specifically allowed collective bargaining agreements to specify that such time to be paid.Analyze the case in light of these two relevant laws. What characteristics or qualities should a practitioner look for in selecting a mediator to help resolve a labor dispute? What are some potential costs or risks parties face during a work stoppage?arrow_forwardHenry has worked for N 49,a small manufacturer of transistors, as a production supervisor for 15 years. He is 42 years old and the oldest member of the young workforce. He is also the only member of the production team paid a regular salary rather than an hourly wage, and the only one with a non competition agreement which restricts him from working for any other electronics component manufacturer in the province for five years following termination of his employment. With N 49 except as a result of a layoff. Due to COVID-19 and is a part of a the other production workers be reduced to six hour shifts but to be on call, including weekends, without any extra pay if there is a demand spike. Henry explained to his boss Ted that he couldn't follow this plan as it would require him to be available on the weekends when he must be available to look after his young children so that his wife Haley can go on her shifts as an emergency medical service. Dispatcher N 49 is not…arrow_forward
- Henry has worked for N 49,a small manufacturer of transistors, as a production supervisor for 15 years. He is 42 years old and the oldest member of the young workforce. He is also the only member of the production team paid a regular salary rather than an hourly wage, and the only one with a non competition agreement which restricts him from working for any other electronics component manufacturer in the province for five years following termination of his employment. With N 49 except as a result of a layoff. Due to COVID-19 and is a part of a the other production workers be reduced to six hour shifts but to be on call, including weekends, without any extra pay if there is a demand spike. Henry explained to his boss Ted that he couldn't follow this plan as it would require him to be available on the weekends when he must be available to look after his young children so that his wife Haley can go on her shifts as an emergency medical service. Dispatcher N 49 is not…arrow_forwardPlease help with the question.arrow_forwardassume that employees at Company Y have engaged in a strike thier employer is mot happy ans has dismissed all the striking employees. Advise the employees on the requirements for both substantive and procedural fairness for dismissalsarrow_forward
- 18-6. Discharge by Operation of Law. Dr. Jake Lambert signed an employment agreement with Baptist Health Services, Inc., to provide cardiothoracic surgery services to Baptist Memorial Hospital-North Mississippi, Inc., in Oxford, Mississippi. Complaints about Lambert's behavior arose almost immediately. He was evaluated by a team of doctors and psychologists, who diagnosed him as suffering from obsessive-compulsive personality disorder and concluded that he was unfit to practice medicine. Based on this conclusion, the hospital suspended his staff privileges. Citing the suspension, Baptist Health Services claimed that Lambert had breached his employment contract. What is Lambert's best defense to this claim? Explain. [Baptist Memorial Hospital-North Mississippi, Inc. v. Lambert, 157 So.3d 109 (Miss.App. 2015)] (See Discharge by Operation of Law.)arrow_forwardIn response to illegal or unethical behaviors of local union officials, the Landrum-Griffin Act of 1959 allows: Union members to immediately decertify the union National unions to take over and replace elected local officials with an appointed trustee The NLRB to run an immediate election of new union officials Employers to step in on behalf of their workers and take over the unionarrow_forwardLaurie, a lesbian and French national, was hired as a flight attendant to work in United Airlines’ hub in Paris. Laurie was terminated at age 40. She sues United Airlines alleging employment discrimination on the basis of age, gender, and affinity orientation (the latter based on the Illinois Human Rights Act). The airline asks the court to dismiss Laurie’s action on the basis that she does not live in the U.S., so the employment protection laws do not apply to her. Will the court do so? Explain. [Rabé v. United Airlines, Inc. 2011 WL677946 (7th Cir. 2011).] What will the court do? Explain Utilize facts / law / precedent. Cite as appropriate 1 page should do.arrow_forward
- N.I.S. promoted John, a forty-two-year-old employee, to a foreman’s position while passing over James, a fiftyeight-year-old employee. N.I.S. told James that he was too old for the job and that the company preferred to have a younger man in the position. Discuss whether James will succeed if he brings a cause of action.arrow_forwardWhich of the following are required for a plaintiff to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination? Select all that apply. 1. that her employer has 10 or more full time employees 2. that she was forced to work in a hostile work environment. 3. that she is someone who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the “essential functions” of the employment position that such individual holds or desires. 4. that she is disabled 5. that she was subjected to unlawful discrimination because of her disabilityarrow_forwardJoan Leikvold was hired by Valley View Community Hospital as an operating room supervisor in 1972. She did not have a contract for a specific duration, nor was she told that the hospital would not discharge her except for cause. She was provided with a policy manual and told that the policies were to be followed in her employment relationship with the hospital. In 1978, she became the director of nursing. In October 1979, she requested a transfer back to her former position in the operating room. The chief executive officer (CEO) felt that it was inadvisable for someone who had been in a managerial position to take a subordinate position. Leikvold withdrew the transfer request but was subsequently fired. Her personnel record indicated “insubordination” as the reason for discharge. Leikvold was an at-will employee. At-will means that there is a contract made for an indefinite duration and either party, employer or employee, may terminate the contract at any time for any reason, or…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education