Concept explainers
Hawaiian Honeycreeper Phylogeny The po'ouli (Melamprosops phaeosoma) was discovered in 1973 by a group of students from the University of Hawaii. Its membership in the Hawaiian honeycreeper clade had been controversial, mainly because its appearance and behavior are so different from other living honeycreepers. It particularly lacked the "old tent" odor characteristic of other honeycreepers.
In 2011, Heather Lerner and her colleagues deciphered phylogeny of the 19 Hawaiian honeycreepers that were not yet officially declared to be extinct at the time, including the po'ouli. The researchers sequenced mitochondrial and nuclear DNA samples taken from the honeycreepers, and also from 28 other birds (outgroups). Phylogenetic analysis of these data firmly establishes the po'ouli as a member of the clade, and also reveals the Eurasian rosefinch as the clade's closest relative (FIGURE 18.10).
FIGURE 18.10 Phylogeny of Hawaiian honeycreepers. This cladogram was constructed using sequence comparisons of mitochondrial DNA (whole genome), and 13 nuclear DNA loci of 19 Hawaiian honeycreepers and 28 other finch species.
What is the sister group of the 'Akikiki (Oreomystis bairdi)
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 18 Solutions
Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Essentials of Human Anatomy & Physiology (12th Edition)
BIOLOGY:THE ESSENTIALS (LL) W/CONNECT
Campbell Biology in Focus
Biology Illinois Edition (Glencoe Science)
Campbell Essential Biology (6th Edition) - standalone book
Concepts of Genetics (11th Edition)
- Hawaiian Honeycreeper Phylogeny The po'ouli (Melamprosops phaeosoma) was discovered in 1973 by a group of students from the University of Hawaii. Its membership in the Hawaiian honeycreeper clade had been controversial, mainly because its appearance and behavior are so different from other living honeycreepers. It particularly lacked the "old tent" odor characteristic of other honeycreepers. In 2011, Heather Lerner and her colleagues deciphered phylogeny of the 19 Hawaiian honeycreepers that were not yet officially declared to be extinct at the time, including the po'ouli. The researchers sequenced mitochondrial and nuclear DNA samples taken from the honeycreepers, and also from 28 other birds (outgroups). Phylogenetic analysis of these data firmly establishes the po'ouli as a member of the clade, and also reveals the Eurasian rosefinch as the clade's closest relative (FIGURE 18.10). FIGURE 18.10 Phylogeny of Hawaiian honeycreepers. This cladogram was constructed using sequence comparisons of mitochondrial DNA (whole genome), and 13 nuclear DNA loci of 19 Hawaiian honeycreepers and 28 other finch species. Which species is most closely related to the 'Apapane (Himatione sanguinea)?arrow_forwardHawaiian Honeycreeper Phylogeny The po'ouli (Melamprosops phaeosoma) was discovered in 1973 by a group of students from the University of Hawaii. Its membership in the Hawaiian honeycreeper clade had been controversial, mainly because its appearance and behavior are so different from other living honeycreepers. It particularly lacked the "old tent" odor characteristic of other honeycreepers. In 2011, Heather Lerner and her colleagues deciphered phylogeny of the 19 Hawaiian honeycreepers that were not yet officially declared to be extinct at the time, including the po'ouli. The researchers sequenced mitochondrial and nuclear DNA samples taken from the honeycreepers, and also from 28 other birds (outgroups). Phylogenetic analysis of these data firmly establishes the po'ouli as a member of the clade, and also reveals the Eurasian rosefinch as the clade's closest relative (FIGURE 18.10). FIGURE 18.10 Phylogeny of Hawaiian honeycreepers. This cladogram was constructed using sequence comparisons of mitochondrial DNA (whole genome), and 13 nuclear DNA loci of 19 Hawaiian honeycreepers and 28 other finch species. Which species is more closely related to the Palila (Loxioides bailleui): the Tiwi (Vestiaria coccinea) or the Maui 'Alauahio (Paroreomyza montana)?arrow_forwardPlz asaparrow_forward
- Please contruct a dichotomous tree out of this dichotomous keyarrow_forward.arrow_forwardPhylogenetic tree of some deuterostome relationships 2 embryo develops anus first, mouth second 5 6 7 8 6 9 10 11 1 sea star sea urchin Use the table below to fill in phylogenic features according to the number phylogenic tree. 3 lamprey Box # Phenotypic Feature 1 perch 2 3 goldfish 4 5 frog 6 7 123 rat 8 12 9 13 14 bat 10 11 15 lizard 12 13 16 bird 14 15 turtle 16arrow_forward
- Based on the phylogentic tree attached Question 1 The placement of Melibe digitata and Melibe viridis is: a) Suspicious because long branch attraction may be a factor b) Suspicious because the branch is not fully shown c) Suspicious because it belongs to an unresolved clade with Cuthonia divae and Lomanotus sp. E d) Not suspicious because it has a Bayesian posterior probability of the maximum 1 Question 2 The estimate of phylogenetic relationships of Marionia sp. 10 is sufficient evidence on which to base its status as a distinct species: a) Clearly, yes b) Clearly, no c) Maybe, but it depends on the bootstrap support uniting two samples on the tree d) Maybe, but it depends on evidence from other data sources Question 3 The sister group of Tritoniopsis alba with three asterisks to its right-hand side is: a) Tritoniopsis sp. b) Both Tritoniopsis sp. c) Tritoniopsis alba (without asterisks) d) Tritoniopsis frydis e) Both Tritoniopsis sp. and Tritoniopsis alba (without asterisks), and…arrow_forward*Each number (1.1, 2.1, etc) represents a character/synapomorphy. How many character changes are there in the cladogram? Are there any unexpected or unusual result in the cladogram?arrow_forwardPlease construct a dichotomous key out of thisarrow_forward
- Morphological Information Baltimore Oriole Black-backed Oriole Female Male Kondo, Baker, & Omland 2004 2B. Based on the morphological information above, should the Baltimore Oriole and Black- backed Oriole be classified as one species or two species? What if we only had information about females?arrow_forwardAs we have discussed in class, phylogenies are hypotheses, and can therefore change over time with new evidence. Relatively recent and strong molecular evidence (that we did not discuss in class) suggests that all members of the Subphylum Hexapoda are derived from a common ancestor within the Subphylum Crustacea, as in the cladogram shown below. Given this new information, answer the question below. Note: Don't panic. Some of the names of these groups are new to you (Copepoda, Malacostraca, and Remipedia are all classes or subclasses within the Subphylum Crustacea), but this will not affect your ability to answer this question. Myriapoda Copepoda (Crustacea) Malacostraca (Crustacea) Hexapoda Remipedia (Crustacea) If we insisted that all groups must be categorized and named so that taxonomic ranks/names always include a single common ancestor and all of its descendants, how would this new evidence change our definition of a hexapod? Hexapoda and Melacostraca would have to be classified…arrow_forwardplease send me answerarrow_forward
- Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap...BiologyISBN:9781337408332Author:Cecie Starr, Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, Lisa StarrPublisher:Cengage LearningBiology Today and Tomorrow without Physiology (Mi...BiologyISBN:9781305117396Author:Cecie Starr, Christine Evers, Lisa StarrPublisher:Cengage Learning