Mathematical Ideas (13th Edition) - Standalone book
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780321977076
Author: Charles D. Miller, Vern E. Heeren, John Hornsby, Christopher Heeren
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15.2, Problem 31E
To determine
The voter profile for 41 voters and 3 candidates g, j and e, so that j wins the first Borda election with the most Borda points, and where irrelevant alternatives criterion is violated after candidate e is deleted.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
The U.S. Census Bureau conducts annual surveys to obtain information on the percentage of the voting-age population that is registered to vote. Suppose that 713 employed persons and 613 unemployed persons are independently and randomly selected and that 338 of the employed persons and 244 of the unemployed persons have registered to vote. Can we conclude that the percentage of employed workers ( p1 ), who have registered to vote, exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers ( p2 ), who have registered to vote? Use a significance level of α=0.1 for the test.
Step 1 of 6 :
State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.
Step 2 of 6 :
Find the values of the two sample proportions, pˆ1p^1 and pˆ2p^2. Round your answers to three decimal places.
Step 3 of 6 :
Compute the weighted estimate of p, p‾p‾. Round your answer to three decimal places.
Step 4 of 6 :
Compute the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to two decimal places.…
2. Three friends decides whether to go to the night club on Friday night or not every week.
The data of several votings is presented in the table.
Andrey Bob Constantine | Final decision
1| yes
| 2 | no
3 no
4 yes
5 yes
yes yes
yes yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
no
no
yes no
yes
There is no more information about the voting system, the results of other polls are also unknown. Is their
rule: 1) anonymous, 2) neutral, 3) monotone? Explain your answer.
A telecommunication company proposed construction of a cell site tower in a certain city. To determine whether this is to be constructed, a vote is to be taken among the residents of a city and the surrounding barangays. Many residents in the barangays feel that the proposal will pass because of the large proportion of city voters who favor the construction. A poll is taken to determine if there is a significant difference in the proportion of city voters and barangay voters favoring the proposal. If 250 of 400 city voters favor the proposal and 360 of 500 barangay residents favor it, would you agree that the proportion of city voters favoring the proposal is higher than the proportion of barangay voters? Use a 0.025 level of significance.
Chapter 15 Solutions
Mathematical Ideas (13th Edition) - Standalone book
Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by the Plurality Method A...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by the Plurality Method A...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by Alternative Methods For...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by Alternative MethodsFor...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...
Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Holding a Runoff Election One common solution to...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 21ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 26ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 27ECh. 15.1 - The Pairwise Comparison Method Each table...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 29ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 30ECh. 15.1 - The Borda Method Each table represents a Borda...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 32ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 33ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 34ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 35ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 36ECh. 15.1 - The Coombs Method The Coombs method of voting is a...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 38ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 39ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 40ECh. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 9ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 10ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 11ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 12ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 13ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 14ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 15ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 16ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 17ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 18ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 19ECh. 15.2 - Irrelevant Alternatives in a Hare Method Election...Ch. 15.2 - 21. Explain why a violation of the majority...Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 26ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 27ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 28ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 29ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 30ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 31ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 32ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 33ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 34ECh. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Solve each problem.
5. New Trees for Wisconsin...Ch. 15.3 - Apportioning Computers to Schools Enrollments for...Ch. 15.3 - Assigning Faculty to Courses The English...Ch. 15.3 - 8. Apportioning Sailboats to Resorts The number of...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 9ECh. 15.3 - 10. Show that the Webster method apportionment of...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 11ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 12ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 13ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 14ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 15ECh. 15.3 - Find the Huntington-Hill cutoff point for rounding...Ch. 15.3 - Creating a Profile of School Bus Riders Create a...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 18ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 19ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.3 - The standard quotas rounded up to the nearest...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 21ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.4 - 26. The Jefferson and Adams methods are both...Ch. 15 - How many different complete rankings are possible...Ch. 15 - Prob. 2TCh. 15 - Prob. 3TCh. 15 - Prob. 4TCh. 15 - Prob. 5TCh. 15 - Why is the irrelevant alternatives criterion an...Ch. 15 - Prob. 7TCh. 15 - Prob. 8TCh. 15 - Prob. 9TCh. 15 - Prob. 10TCh. 15 - Prob. 11TCh. 15 - Prob. 12TCh. 15 - Prob. 13TCh. 15 - Prob. 14TCh. 15 - Prob. 15TCh. 15 - Prob. 16TCh. 15 - Prob. 17TCh. 15 - Prob. 18TCh. 15 - Prob. 19TCh. 15 - Prob. 20TCh. 15 - Prob. 21TCh. 15 - Prob. 22TCh. 15 - Prob. 23TCh. 15 - Prob. 24TCh. 15 - Prob. 25TCh. 15 - One hundred seats are to be apportioned to 4...Ch. 15 - Prob. 27TCh. 15 - Prob. 28TCh. 15 - Prob. 29TCh. 15 - Explain the Alabama paradox.Ch. 15 - Prob. 31TCh. 15 - Prob. 32T
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- A county clerk wants to improve voter registration. He wants to send out reminders in the mail to all citizens in the county who are eligible to vote. To determine if it will actually improve voter registration, a random sample of 1250 potential voters was taken. No reminders were sent out to a group of 625 eligible voters and of those 625, 299 registered to vote. Reminders were sent out to another group of 625 voters and of those 348 registered to vote. The county clerk claims that the proportion of people who registered was significantly greater in the group that was sent the reminders. Using a 0.10 significance level, test the claim that the proportion of registered voters is higher in the group that received the reminders. What is the test statistic for this test? A county clerk wants to improve voter registration. He wants to send out reminders in the mail to all citizens in the county who are eligible to vote. To determine if it will actually improve voter registration, a…arrow_forwardAnswer the following questions for the voter profile shown to the right. Number of Voters Ranking 17 a >b>c> d >e (a) Which alternative is a majority candidate? (b) Which alternative is the Borda method winner? (c) Does the Borda method violate the majority criterion for the voter profile? 4 b>c>d>e > a 3 c>d>b> e>a 4 d>b>c> a >e 3. e >c>d> a > b (a) Which alternative is a majority candidate? e a There is no majority candidate. (b) Which alternative is the Borda method winner? e a b. O There is no Bordamethod winner. (c) Does the Borda method violate the majority criterion for the voter profile? Yes No O Time Remaining: 01:53:38 Next E O O O @ O 0 oarrow_forwardAn election is held among four candidates (A, B, C, and D). Using a voting method we will call X, the winner of the election is candidate A. However, candidate D has more than 50% of the possible votes. Based on this information, we can say that voting method X violates the O Condorcet criterion O monotonicity criterion. O independence of irrelevant alternatives criterion. O majority criterion.arrow_forward
- Number of voters 1* Choice 2ND Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice 10 17 B G C M F6 F7 16 8 G BCMB 2MCG CMB G B When the pairwise comparison method was used, there was a tie for first place between Green and Chad (work for this is not shown). Then Matthews was disqualified because his GPA was too low and the votes were recounted. Was the irrelevant alternatives criterion violated if the pairwise voting method was used? Explain clearly by showing work and stating your answer in complete sentences. М File - Google Chro... DELL F8 50 F9 F10arrow_forwardConsider the weighted voting system [q: 13, 11, 10, 8, 4]. Assume that this system has no dictators and is not subject to gridlock. (a) What is the weight of the coalition formed by P,, P3, and P? (b) For what values of the quota q is the coalition formed by P,, Pa, and P, a winning coalition? (c) For what values of the quota q is the coalition formed by P,, P3, and Pa a losing coalition? (a) What is the weight of the coalition formed by P2, Pa, and P? The weight of the coalition (P2, P3, Pa) is. (b) For what values of the quota q is the coalition formed by P2, P3, and Pa a winning coalition? The coalition {P2, P3, Pa) is a winning coalition for all values of q from through . (c) For what values of the quota q is the coalition formed by P,, Pa, and P a losing coalition? The coalition {P2, P3, Pa) is a losing coalition for all values of q from through . MacBook Air F2 G00 F4 FS F9 @ #3 2$ % * 3 4 8 9. Q Y A S D K V alt option command comm ర Narrow_forwardWhy is it impossible, with an odd number of voters, to have two distinct candidates win the same election using Condorcet's method.arrow_forward
- The marketing committee at Publix is considering three new services to offer: • delivery (D), • self-serve checkout (S), and • catering (C). Number of votes 8 9. 10 First C C Second D C Third D After several hours of debate, a second vote is taken. In the second election, the five people who previously voted C, S, D now vote S, C, D. Number of votes 8 9. 16 First D S Second Third C Using the plurality with elimination method, which service wins the first and second election? Does this result violate the monotonicity criterion? a First vote: self-serve service, Second vote: delivery service, yes monotonicity criterion is not violated. First vote: self-serve service, Second vote: delivery service, yes monotonicity criterion is violated. First vote: catering, Second vote: self-service, yes monotonicity criterion is violated. d First vote: self-serve service, Second vote: catering service, yes monotonicity criterion is violated.arrow_forwardplease help me with this question ASAParrow_forwardA chamber of commerce election has 18 candidates for 7 positions. The election consists of two stages. In the first stage, there is an ordered election, with the president being selected first, followed by the vice-president, and then the treasurer, and finally the secretary. In the second stage, the remaining seats are considered 'at large' seats. All the remaining candidates are considered and the 'at large' seats are selected at the same time. How many possible board combinations are there? 1,113,840 margin of error +/- 2.5%arrow_forward
- Ques 46, 47 and 48 are three subparts.arrow_forward33. Not all third party elections require only 3 candidates. There is an election for the mayor of the town of Manifest. The candidates are: • Lincoln, • Adams, and . Соорer. The city newspaper conducted a poll of as many citizens as they could. The results of poll were: Lincoln 28%, Adams 40%, and • Cooper 32%. There was a fourth candidate that qualified at the last possible moment to run for mayor, Taft. The paper found out that several voters prefer Taft over Adams. Below is the results of the election. Candidate Percentage of Votes Lincoln 28% Adams 23% 31% Сооper Taft 14% What can be said about the addition of the 4th choice for the mayor? Summarize who wins, who loses, and why. Write your response below:arrow_forwardOne of the voting methods requires voters to rank all candidates from the most favorable to the least favorable. Each last-place vote receives 1 point, each next-to-last place vote 2 points, and so on. This voting method is called the _________ method. The candidate with the ______ is the winner.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...MathISBN:9781259676512Author:Kenneth H RosenPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationMathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...MathISBN:9780134392790Author:Beckmann, SybillaPublisher:PEARSON
- Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)MathISBN:9780134683713Author:Robert F. BlitzerPublisher:PEARSONDiscrete Mathematics With ApplicationsMathISBN:9781337694193Author:EPP, Susanna S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)MathISBN:9781259985607Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. MercerPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...
Math
ISBN:9781259676512
Author:Kenneth H Rosen
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Mathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...
Math
ISBN:9780134392790
Author:Beckmann, Sybilla
Publisher:PEARSON
Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)
Math
ISBN:9780134683713
Author:Robert F. Blitzer
Publisher:PEARSON
Discrete Mathematics With Applications
Math
ISBN:9781337694193
Author:EPP, Susanna S.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)
Math
ISBN:9781259985607
Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. Mercer
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Chi Square test; Author: Vectors Academy;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f53nXHoMXx4;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY