Concept explainers
a)
Profit maximizing
a)
Explanation of Solution
Therefore, profits are,
Differentiating the profit equation with respect to
Second order condition, proves that this price and quantity maximizes the profits for a monopolist.
And profits given this price and quantity is,
b)
Nash equilibrium output for two firms operating in Cournot model. Also to compute
market output, price and firms profits.
b)
Explanation of Solution
From the demand function, we get,
Also,
So, profit for the firm 1 ,
Differentiating with respect to
And similarly, profit equation of the firm 2 reveals,
Solving 1 and 2 we get,
Market output will be,
And market price is,
So, at
The profits for firm 1 is,
The profit for firm 2 is,
c)
To find Nash
c)
Explanation of Solution
In case of a Bertrand model, undercutting of prices by both the firms leads to price becoming approximately nil in the given scenario. Hence the price will tend to zero, and quantity will become tending to 150 .
So, price
And Quantity
As there are no cost to production so firms will undercut to a level that at the end of the day both firms will be willing to provide the quantity at price 0 .
Profits for the firm
And market output is,
However the maximum demand is only for 150 units, therefore market output is 150 .
d)
To graph the demand curve for cases in parts (a), (b), (c).
d)
Explanation of Solution
In the above diagram, Price is measured on
In part
In part c, the two firms follows Bertand
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Suppose that two airlines are Cournot duopolists serving the Peoria-Dubuque route, and the demand curve for tickets per day is Q = 230 - 2p (so p = 115 - Q/2). Total costs of running a flight on this route are 450 + 40q, where q is the number of passengers on the flight. Each flight has a capacity of 80 passengers. In Cournot equilibrium, each duopolist will run one flight per day and will make a daily profit of a) $3,250. b) $1,600. c) $225. d) $800. e) $230.arrow_forwardJim and TJ are Cournot duopolists. They each make an identical product. They will simultaneously choose a quantity of output, yj and yr respectively. The market for this product has an inverse demand curve p = 15 – y, where y = YJ + YT is the total quantity of output produced by both Jim and TJ. Their production costs are identical: production costs for each person i are c(yi) = 3y;. Say that both people are profit-motivated. Derive reaction functions for each person (their optimal choice given the choice made by the other person). Thus find the quantity produced by each person and the price in the Nash equilibrium of this game. Now say that Jim is not profit-motivated, but spite-motivated. He has one goal: to ensure that TJ cannot make positive profit, no matter what yr he picks. At least how much output YJ will Jim choose to produce? Explain the economic intuition behind your answer.arrow_forwardSuppose two firms compete as Bertrand duopolists for an identical product, where demand is given by Q = 5000 – 50P and both firms have marginal cost of 10 per unit of output. If firm 1 has capacity of 1500 and firm 2 has capacity of 2000, what will the equilibrium price be in this market?arrow_forward
- Two firms - firm 1 and firm 2 - share a market for a specific product. Both have zero marginal cost. They compete in the manner of Bertrand and the market demand for the product is given by: q = 20 − min{p1, p2}. 1. What are the equilibrium prices and profits? 2. Suppose the two firms have signed a collusion contract, that is, they agree to set the same price and share the market equally. What is the price they would set and what would be their profits? For the following parts, suppose the Bertrand game is played for infinitely many times with discount factor for both firms δ ∈ [0, 1). 3. Let both players adopt the following strategy: start with collusion; maintain the collusive price as long as no one has ever deviated before; otherwise set the Bertrand price. What is the minimum value of δ for which this is a SPNE. 4. Suppose the policy maker has imposed a price floor p = 4, that is, neither firm is allowed to set a price below $4. How does your answer to part 3 change? Is it now…arrow_forwardSuppose firms A, B, and C set prices while facing per-period demand of Q = 200 - P, which yields a MR curve MR = 200 – 2Q for a monopolist. When setting prices non-cooperatively, the firms choose their prices simultaneously. All firms have MC = 20. The firms are currently involved in a cartel that sets the monopoly price and divides quantity evenly among the firms. The firms enforce their cartel arrangement with a grim trigger strategy. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has just started an antitrust division that is designed to break up cartels. The DOJ successfully detects and prosecutes a cartel with probability s, and prosecuted cartels receive the fine F and are prevented from ever colluding again. The firms believe that their interaction will continue forever (p = 1.0), and they discount future periods at R 0.80. I. Which strategic variable are the firms choosing? What type of competition is this? O A. Quantity; Cournot O B. Quantity; Bertrand C. Price; Cournot O D. Price; Bertrand…arrow_forwardCournot duopolists face a market demand curve given by P = 60 – 1/2Q, where Q is total market demand in units. Each firm can produce output at a constant marginal cost of $15/unit. a) What is the equilibrium price and quantity produced by each firm? b) What if the firm's engaged in Bertrand competition? c) What if one of the firms chose its quantity before its competitor? What is the name for this sort of competition? d) Which of the three forms of competition gives the greatest social surplus?arrow_forward
- I need answers of A, B, Carrow_forwardSuppose that two duopolists (firm A and Firm B) produce identical products. The firms face the following market demand curve P=1250-Q Where Q = Total output in the duopoly market Qa= Firm A’s output Qb = Firm B’s output P = Price in the duopoly market Firm A and Firm B make output decisions sequentially. Firm A is the leading firm that makes the first move, and firm B is the following firm. Firm A rationally anticipates the output reaction of Firm B, as Firm A has the prior knowledge of Firm B’s output-reaction curve, which is Qb = 600-0.5Qa It is assumed that firm B always acts in the same manner. Both firms have constant marginal costs (MC) of production where MCa=MCb=$50. Fixed Costs are nil because expenses have already been fully amortised In this duopoly market, equilibrium level of output is __________, and equilibrium level of price is ___________arrow_forwardConsider two firms, referred to as firms 1 and 2, who compete in a market by choosing quantities produced and face the following inverse demand: P(Q) 10-20 Each firm has a marginal cost of production of $4.00. Suppose these firms collude by agreeing to produce quantities to maximize their joint profits. Firm 1 sticks to the agreement, but firm 2 does not. If firm 2 can secretly change its produced quantity, how much would it produce?arrow_forward
- Ugly Dolls Inc. (UD) is a firm in Mytown that sells its products on a market under monopolistic competition. The cost function of UD is represented by TC = 100+10Q. Lately, because of the UD is making a big amount of profit, some firms enter the market to compete. Assume that Mytown engages in free trade in the dolls markets with Yourtown, who also faces a market with monopolistic competition. Because of this we can expect that, (a) The numbers of firms operating in this market will not change. (b) At equilibrium the profit of firms will increase. (c) The quantity of types of dolls available to consumers will increase. (d) All the above answers are correct.arrow_forwardThree firms, A, B and C engage in Bertrand price competition in a market with inverse demand given by P = 123 − 2Q. Whenever a firm undercuts the rivals’ price, it gets the entire demand. If firms charge the same lowest price in the market, they share the market. If a firm charges a price more than any rival, it has zero market share. Suppose there are no fixed costs, and the marginal costs of the firms are: c(A) = 91, c(B) = 83 and c(C) = 43. Find a Nash equilibrium of this game. What are each firm’s prices and profits? Explain solution. Suppose firm B leaves the market. Draw each firm’s best response on a diagram and find a Nash equilibrium of this duopoly game. Suppose the above game in part 2 between firms A and C was the stage game of an infinitely repeated game. Would it be possible for the two firms to collude or form a cartel in this case?arrow_forwardSuppose that two Japanese companies, Hitachi and Toshiba, are the sole producers (i.e., duopolists) of a microprocessor chip used in a number of different brands of personal computers. Assume that total demand for the chips is fixed and that each firm charges the same price for the chips. Each firm’s market share and profits are a function of the magnitude of the promotional campaign used to promote its version of the chip. Also assume that only two strategies are available to each firm: a limited promotional campaign (budget) and an extensive promotional campaign (budget). If the two firms engage in a limited promotional campaign, each firm will earn a quarterly profit of $14 million. If the two firms undertake an extensive promotional campaign, each firm will earn a quarterly profit of $11 million. With this strategy combination, market share and total sales will be the same as for a limited promotional campaign, but promotional costs will be higher and hence profits will be lower.…arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning