Exercises 48−51 establish rules for null quantification that we can use when a quantified variable does not appear in part of a statement. 50. Establish these logical equivalences, where x does not occur as a free variable in A . Assume that the domain is nonempty. a) SS ∀ x ( A → P ( x ) ) ≡ A → ∀ x P ( x ) b) ∃ x ( A → P ( x ) ) ≡ A → ∃ x P ( x )
Exercises 48−51 establish rules for null quantification that we can use when a quantified variable does not appear in part of a statement. 50. Establish these logical equivalences, where x does not occur as a free variable in A . Assume that the domain is nonempty. a) SS ∀ x ( A → P ( x ) ) ≡ A → ∀ x P ( x ) b) ∃ x ( A → P ( x ) ) ≡ A → ∃ x P ( x )
Solution Summary: The author explains the logical equivalence of the statements forall x(Ato P(x)) and
Female
Male
Totals
Less than High School
Diploma
0.077
0.110
0.187
High School Diploma
0.154
0.201
0.355
Some College/University
0.141
0.129
0.270
College/University Graduate
0.092
0.096
0.188
Totals
0.464
0.536
1.000
Female
Male
Totals
Less than High School
Diploma
0.077
0.110
0.187
High School Diploma
0.154
0.201
0.355
Some College/University
0.141
0.129
0.270
College/University Graduate
0.092
0.096
0.188
Totals
0.464
0.536
1.000
Female
Male
Totals
Less than High School
Diploma
0.077
0.110
0.187
High School Diploma
0.154
0.201
0.355
Some College/University
0.141
0.129
0.270
College/University Graduate
0.092
0.096
0.188
Totals
0.464
0.536
1.000
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
MFCS unit-1 || Part:1 || JNTU || Well formed formula || propositional calculus || truth tables; Author: Learn with Smily;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV15Q4mCcHc;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY