Apply knowledge that you have gained in this chapter and one or more of the FLaReS principles to evaluate the following statements or claims. A scientist claims that the increase in the atmosphere concentration of carbon dioxide from 0.02% to 0.04% is not important in terms of global warming. His reasoning is that the water vapor makes up about 2-3% of the atmosphere and water vapor is only about one-tenth as effective as CO 2 as a greenhouse gas; thus, the 0.02% increase in CO 2 is equivalent to trivial 0.2% increase in water vapor. Concept Introduction: FLaReS are a set of rules to test a claim: Falsifiability: is there any evidence to show that the claim is false. Logic: Any evidence provided in support of claim must be of sound reasoning. The conclusion follows inevitably from its premises provided the premise is true. Replicability: If a claim is based on experimental result it is necessary for the evidence to be replicable in subsequent experiment or trial. Sufficiency: Burden of the evidence for any claim rests on the claimant. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence based on authority and or testimony is never adequate. If a claim possess all four, then it might be true. On the other hand, it could still be proven false. However, if a claim fails even one of the FLaReS tests it is likely to be false.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 13.6CTE

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Apply knowledge that you have gained in this chapter and one or more of the FLaReS principles to evaluate the following statements or claims.
A scientist claims that the increase in the atmosphere concentration of carbon dioxide from 0.02% to 0.04% is not important in terms of global warming. His reasoning is that the water vapor makes up about 2-3% of the atmosphere and water vapor is only about one-tenth as effective as CO₂ as a greenhouse gas; thus, the 0.02% increase in CO₂ is equivalent to trivial 0.2% increase in water vapor.

Concept Introduction:

FLaReS are a set of rules to test a claim:

Falsifiability: is there any evidence to show that the claim is false.

Logic: Any evidence provided in support of claim must be of sound reasoning. The conclusion follows inevitably from its premises provided the premise is true.

Replicability: If a claim is based on experimental result it is necessary for the evidence to be replicable in subsequent experiment or trial.

Sufficiency: Burden of the evidence for any claim rests on the claimant. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence based on authority and or testimony is never adequate.

If a claim possess all four, then it might be true. On the other hand, it could still be proven false. However, if a claim fails even one of the FLaReS tests it is likely to be false.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Label the spectrum with spectroscopy

Please correct answer and don't use hand rating and don't use Ai solution

Label the spectrum with spectroscopy

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 13.6CTE

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Apply knowledge that you have gained in this chapter and one or more of the FLaReS principles to evaluate the following statements or claims.
A scientist claims that the increase in the atmosphere concentration of carbon dioxide from 0.02% to 0.04% is not important in terms of global warming. His reasoning is that the water vapor makes up about 2-3% of the atmosphere and water vapor is only about one-tenth as effective as CO₂ as a greenhouse gas; thus, the 0.02% increase in CO₂ is equivalent to trivial 0.2% increase in water vapor.

Concept Introduction:

FLaReS are a set of rules to test a claim:

Falsifiability: is there any evidence to show that the claim is false.

Logic: Any evidence provided in support of claim must be of sound reasoning. The conclusion follows inevitably from its premises provided the premise is true.

Replicability: If a claim is based on experimental result it is necessary for the evidence to be replicable in subsequent experiment or trial.

Sufficiency: Burden of the evidence for any claim rests on the claimant. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence based on authority and or testimony is never adequate.

If a claim possess all four, then it might be true. On the other hand, it could still be proven false. However, if a claim fails even one of the FLaReS tests it is likely to be false.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 13.6CTE

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Apply knowledge that you have gained in this chapter and one or more of the FLaReS principles to evaluate the following statements or claims.
A scientist claims that the increase in the atmosphere concentration of carbon dioxide from 0.02% to 0.04% is not important in terms of global warming. His reasoning is that the water vapor makes up about 2-3% of the atmosphere and water vapor is only about one-tenth as effective as CO₂ as a greenhouse gas; thus, the 0.02% increase in CO₂ is equivalent to trivial 0.2% increase in water vapor.

Concept Introduction:

FLaReS are a set of rules to test a claim:

Falsifiability: is there any evidence to show that the claim is false.

Logic: Any evidence provided in support of claim must be of sound reasoning. The conclusion follows inevitably from its premises provided the premise is true.

Replicability: If a claim is based on experimental result it is necessary for the evidence to be replicable in subsequent experiment or trial.

Sufficiency: Burden of the evidence for any claim rests on the claimant. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence based on authority and or testimony is never adequate.

If a claim possess all four, then it might be true. On the other hand, it could still be proven false. However, if a claim fails even one of the FLaReS tests it is likely to be false.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 13.6CTE

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Apply knowledge that you have gained in this chapter and one or more of the FLaReS principles to evaluate the following statements or claims.
A scientist claims that the increase in the atmosphere concentration of carbon dioxide from 0.02% to 0.04% is not important in terms of global warming. His reasoning is that the water vapor makes up about 2-3% of the atmosphere and water vapor is only about one-tenth as effective as CO₂ as a greenhouse gas; thus, the 0.02% increase in CO₂ is equivalent to trivial 0.2% increase in water vapor.

Concept Introduction:

FLaReS are a set of rules to test a claim:

Falsifiability: is there any evidence to show that the claim is false.

Logic: Any evidence provided in support of claim must be of sound reasoning. The conclusion follows inevitably from its premises provided the premise is true.

Replicability: If a claim is based on experimental result it is necessary for the evidence to be replicable in subsequent experiment or trial.

Sufficiency: Burden of the evidence for any claim rests on the claimant. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence based on authority and or testimony is never adequate.

If a claim possess all four, then it might be true. On the other hand, it could still be proven false. However, if a claim fails even one of the FLaReS tests it is likely to be false.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 13, Problem 13.6CTE

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Apply knowledge that you have gained in this chapter and one or more of the FLaReS principles to evaluate the following statements or claims.
A scientist claims that the increase in the atmosphere concentration of carbon dioxide from 0.02% to 0.04% is not important in terms of global warming. His reasoning is that the water vapor makes up about 2-3% of the atmosphere and water vapor is only about one-tenth as effective as CO₂ as a greenhouse gas; thus, the 0.02% increase in CO₂ is equivalent to trivial 0.2% increase in water vapor.

Concept Introduction:

FLaReS are a set of rules to test a claim:

Falsifiability: is there any evidence to show that the claim is false.

Logic: Any evidence provided in support of claim must be of sound reasoning. The conclusion follows inevitably from its premises provided the premise is true.

Replicability: If a claim is based on experimental result it is necessary for the evidence to be replicable in subsequent experiment or trial.

Sufficiency: Burden of the evidence for any claim rests on the claimant. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence based on authority and or testimony is never adequate.

If a claim possess all four, then it might be true. On the other hand, it could still be proven false. However, if a claim fails even one of the FLaReS tests it is likely to be false.

Answer 6

Chapter 13, Problem 13.6CTE

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Apply knowledge that you have gained in this chapter and one or more of the FLaReS principles to evaluate the following statements or claims.
A scientist claims that the increase in the atmosphere concentration of carbon dioxide from 0.02% to 0.04% is not important in terms of global warming. His reasoning is that the water vapor makes up about 2-3% of the atmosphere and water vapor is only about one-tenth as effective as CO₂ as a greenhouse gas; thus, the 0.02% increase in CO₂ is equivalent to trivial 0.2% increase in water vapor.

Concept Introduction:

FLaReS are a set of rules to test a claim:

Falsifiability: is there any evidence to show that the claim is false.

Logic: Any evidence provided in support of claim must be of sound reasoning. The conclusion follows inevitably from its premises provided the premise is true.

Replicability: If a claim is based on experimental result it is necessary for the evidence to be replicable in subsequent experiment or trial.

Sufficiency: Burden of the evidence for any claim rests on the claimant. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence based on authority and or testimony is never adequate.

If a claim possess all four, then it might be true. On the other hand, it could still be proven false. However, if a claim fails even one of the FLaReS tests it is likely to be false.

Answer 7

Chapter 13, Problem 13.6CTE

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Apply knowledge that you have gained in this chapter and one or more of the FLaReS principles to evaluate the following statements or claims.
A scientist claims that the increase in the atmosphere concentration of carbon dioxide from 0.02% to 0.04% is not important in terms of global warming. His reasoning is that the water vapor makes up about 2-3% of the atmosphere and water vapor is only about one-tenth as effective as CO₂ as a greenhouse gas; thus, the 0.02% increase in CO₂ is equivalent to trivial 0.2% increase in water vapor.

Concept Introduction:

FLaReS are a set of rules to test a claim:

Falsifiability: is there any evidence to show that the claim is false.

Logic: Any evidence provided in support of claim must be of sound reasoning. The conclusion follows inevitably from its premises provided the premise is true.

Replicability: If a claim is based on experimental result it is necessary for the evidence to be replicable in subsequent experiment or trial.

Sufficiency: Burden of the evidence for any claim rests on the claimant. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence based on authority and or testimony is never adequate.

If a claim possess all four, then it might be true. On the other hand, it could still be proven false. However, if a claim fails even one of the FLaReS tests it is likely to be false.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 11

Ch. 13 - Prob. 1RQ Ch. 13 - Name on replacement for CFCs. What problems are...Ch. 13 - Prob. 3RQ Ch. 13 - Prob. 4RQ Ch. 13 - Prob. 5RQ Ch. 13 - Prob. 6RQ Ch. 13 - Prob. 7RQ Ch. 13 - Prob. 8RQ Ch. 13 - 9. What makes photochemical smog different...Ch. 13 - Prob. 10RQ

Concept explainers

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 13 Solutions