Starting Out with Python, Student Value Edition (4th Edition)
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780134444468
Author: Tony Gaddis
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 12, Problem 8PE
Ackermann's Function
Ackermann's Function is a recursive mathematical
If m = 0 then return n + 1
If n = 0 then return ackermann (m - 1, 1)
Otherwise, return ackermann (m - 1, ackermann (m, n - 1))
Once you've designed your function, test it by calling it with small values for m and n.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Need help completing the algorithm here in coding
Help! how do I fix my python coding question for this? (my code also provided)
Need help with coding in this in python!
Chapter 12 Solutions
Starting Out with Python, Student Value Edition (4th Edition)
Ch. 12.2 - It is said that a recursive algorithm has more...Ch. 12.2 - Prob. 2CPCh. 12.2 - What is a recursive case?Ch. 12.2 - What causes a recursive algorithm to stop calling...Ch. 12.2 - What is direct recursion? What is indirect...Ch. 12 - Prob. 1MCCh. 12 - A function is called once from a program's main...Ch. 12 - Prob. 3MCCh. 12 - Prob. 4MCCh. 12 - Prob. 5MC
Ch. 12 - Prob. 6MCCh. 12 - Any problem that can be solved recursively can...Ch. 12 - Actions taken by the computer when a function is...Ch. 12 - A recursive algorithm must _______ in the...Ch. 12 - A recursive algorithm must ______ in the base...Ch. 12 - An algorithm that uses a loop will usually run...Ch. 12 - Some problems can be solved through recursion...Ch. 12 - It is not necessary to have a base case in all...Ch. 12 - In the base case, a recursive method calls itself...Ch. 12 - In Program 12-2 , presented earlier in this...Ch. 12 - In this chapter, the rules given for calculating...Ch. 12 - Is recursion ever required to solve a problem?...Ch. 12 - When recursion is used to solve a problem, why...Ch. 12 - How is a problem usually reduced with a recursive...Ch. 12 - What will the following program display? def...Ch. 12 - Prob. 2AWCh. 12 - The following function uses a loop. Rewrite it as...Ch. 12 - Prob. 1PECh. 12 - Prob. 2PECh. 12 - Prob. 3PECh. 12 - Largest List Item Design a function that accepts a...Ch. 12 - Recursive List Sum Design a function that accepts...Ch. 12 - Prob. 6PECh. 12 - Prob. 7PECh. 12 - Ackermann's Function Ackermann's Function is a...
Additional Engineering Textbook Solutions
Find more solutions based on key concepts
Determine the reactions at the fixed support A and the roller B. EI is constant.
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
What different kinds of surfaces can be produced by turning versus facing?
Degarmo's Materials And Processes In Manufacturing
What is the difference between a process that is ready and a process that is waiting?
Computer Science: An Overview (13th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
Determine the force in members BC, CF, and FE. State if the members are in tension or compression. Prob. F6-7
INTERNATIONAL EDITION---Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 14th edition (SI unit)
Modify the method you wrote for Algorithm Workbench 5 so it performs a case-insensitive test. The method should...
Starting Out with Java: From Control Structures through Objects (7th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
A superclass has the following abstract method: public abstract int getValue( ); Write an example of a getValue...
Starting Out with Java: From Control Structures through Data Structures (4th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- In the diagram, there is a green arrow pointing from Input C (complete data) to Transformer Encoder S_B, which I don’t understand. The teacher model is trained on full data, but S_B should instead receive missing data—this arrow should not point there. Please verify and recreate the diagram to fix this issue. Additionally, the newly created diagram should meet the same clarity standards as the second diagram (Proposed MSCATN). Finally provide the output image of the diagram in image format .arrow_forwardPlease provide me with the output image of both of them . below are the diagrams code make sure to update the code and mentionned clearly each section also the digram should be clearly describe like in the attached image. please do not provide the same answer like in other question . I repost this question because it does not satisfy the requirment I need in terms of clarifty the output of both code are not very well details I have two diagram : first diagram code graph LR subgraph Teacher Model (Pretrained) Input_Teacher[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Prediction[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Features[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_A_Model[Student Model A (Handles Missing Values)] Input_Student_A[Input M (Data with Missing Values)] --> Student_A_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Prediction[Student A Prediction y_A] Student_A_Encoder…arrow_forwardWhy I need ?arrow_forward
- Here are two diagrams. Make them very explicit, similar to Example Diagram 3 (the Architecture of MSCTNN). graph LR subgraph Teacher_Model_B [Teacher Model (Pretrained)] Input_Teacher_B[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder_B[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder_B --> Teacher_Prediction_B[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder_B --> Teacher_Features_B[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_B_Model [Student Model B (Handles Missing Labels)] Input_Student_B[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Student_B_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_B] Student_B_Encoder --> Student_B_Prediction[Student B Prediction y_B] end subgraph Knowledge_Distillation_B [Knowledge Distillation (Student B)] Teacher_Prediction_B -- Logits Distillation Loss (L_logits_B) --> Total_Loss_B Teacher_Features_B -- Feature Alignment Loss (L_feature_B) --> Total_Loss_B Partial_Labels_B[Partial Labels y_p] -- Prediction Loss (L_pred_B) --> Total_Loss_B Total_Loss_B -- Backpropagation -->…arrow_forwardPlease provide me with the output image of both of them . below are the diagrams code I have two diagram : first diagram code graph LR subgraph Teacher Model (Pretrained) Input_Teacher[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Prediction[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Features[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_A_Model[Student Model A (Handles Missing Values)] Input_Student_A[Input M (Data with Missing Values)] --> Student_A_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Prediction[Student A Prediction y_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Features[Student A Features F_A] end subgraph Knowledge_Distillation_A [Knowledge Distillation (Student A)] Teacher_Prediction -- Logits Distillation Loss (L_logits_A) --> Total_Loss_A Teacher_Features -- Feature Alignment Loss (L_feature_A) --> Total_Loss_A Ground_Truth_A[Ground Truth y_gt] -- Prediction Loss (L_pred_A)…arrow_forwardI'm reposting my question again please make sure to avoid any copy paste from the previous answer because those answer did not satisfy or responded to the need that's why I'm asking again The knowledge distillation part is not very clear in the diagram. Please create two new diagrams by separating the two student models: First Diagram (Student A - Missing Values): Clearly illustrate the student training process. Show how knowledge distillation happens between the teacher and Student A. Explain what the teacher teaches Student A (e.g., handling missing values) and how this teaching occurs (e.g., through logits, features, or attention). Second Diagram (Student B - Missing Labels): Similarly, detail the training process for Student B. Clarify how knowledge distillation works between the teacher and Student B. Specify what the teacher teaches Student B (e.g., dealing with missing labels) and how the knowledge is transferred. Since these are two distinct challenges…arrow_forward
- The knowledge distillation part is not very clear in the diagram. Please create two new diagrams by separating the two student models: First Diagram (Student A - Missing Values): Clearly illustrate the student training process. Show how knowledge distillation happens between the teacher and Student A. Explain what the teacher teaches Student A (e.g., handling missing values) and how this teaching occurs (e.g., through logits, features, or attention). Second Diagram (Student B - Missing Labels): Similarly, detail the training process for Student B. Clarify how knowledge distillation works between the teacher and Student B. Specify what the teacher teaches Student B (e.g., dealing with missing labels) and how the knowledge is transferred. Since these are two distinct challenges (missing values vs. missing labels), they should not be combined in the same diagram. Instead, create two separate diagrams for clarity. For reference, I will attach a second image…arrow_forwardNote : please avoid using AI answer the question by carefully reading it and provide a clear and concise solutionHere is a clear background and explanation of the full method, including what each part is doing and why. Background & Motivation Missing values: Some input features (sensor channels) are missing for some samples due to sensor failure or corruption. Missing labels: Not all samples have a ground-truth RUL value. For example, data collected during normal operation is often unlabeled. Most traditional deep learning models require complete data and full labels. But in our case, both are incomplete. If we try to train a model directly, it will either fail to learn properly or discard valuable data. What We Are Doing: Overview We solve this using a Teacher–Student knowledge distillation framework: We train a Teacher model on a clean and complete dataset where both inputs and labels are available. We then use that Teacher to teach two separate Student models: Student A learns…arrow_forwardHere is a clear background and explanation of the full method, including what each part is doing and why. Background & Motivation Missing values: Some input features (sensor channels) are missing for some samples due to sensor failure or corruption. Missing labels: Not all samples have a ground-truth RUL value. For example, data collected during normal operation is often unlabeled. Most traditional deep learning models require complete data and full labels. But in our case, both are incomplete. If we try to train a model directly, it will either fail to learn properly or discard valuable data. What We Are Doing: Overview We solve this using a Teacher–Student knowledge distillation framework: We train a Teacher model on a clean and complete dataset where both inputs and labels are available. We then use that Teacher to teach two separate Student models: Student A learns from incomplete input (some sensor values missing). Student B learns from incomplete labels (RUL labels missing…arrow_forward
- here is a diagram code : graph LR subgraph Inputs [Inputs] A[Input C (Complete Data)] --> TeacherModel B[Input M (Missing Data)] --> StudentA A --> StudentB end subgraph TeacherModel [Teacher Model (Pretrained)] C[Transformer Encoder T] --> D{Teacher Prediction y_t} C --> E[Internal Features f_t] end subgraph StudentA [Student Model A (Trainable - Handles Missing Input)] F[Transformer Encoder S_A] --> G{Student A Prediction y_s^A} B --> F end subgraph StudentB [Student Model B (Trainable - Handles Missing Labels)] H[Transformer Encoder S_B] --> I{Student B Prediction y_s^B} A --> H end subgraph GroundTruth [Ground Truth RUL (Partial Labels)] J[RUL Labels] end subgraph KnowledgeDistillationA [Knowledge Distillation Block for Student A] K[Prediction Distillation Loss (y_s^A vs y_t)] L[Feature Alignment Loss (f_s^A vs f_t)] D -- Prediction Guidance --> K E -- Feature Guidance --> L G --> K F --> L J -- Supervised Guidance (if available) --> G K…arrow_forwarddetails explanation and background We solve this using a Teacher–Student knowledge distillation framework: We train a Teacher model on a clean and complete dataset where both inputs and labels are available. We then use that Teacher to teach two separate Student models: Student A learns from incomplete input (some sensor values missing). Student B learns from incomplete labels (RUL labels missing for some samples). We use knowledge distillation to guide both students, even when labels are missing. Why We Use Two Students Student A handles Missing Input Features: It receives input with some features masked out. Since it cannot see the full input, we help it by transferring internal features (feature distillation) and predictions from the teacher. Student B handles Missing RUL Labels: It receives full input but does not always have a ground-truth RUL label. We guide it using the predictions of the teacher model (prediction distillation). Using two students allows each to specialize in…arrow_forwardWe are doing a custom JSTL custom tag to make display page to access a tag handler. Write two custom tags: 1) A single tag which prints a number (from 0-99) as words. Ex: <abc:numAsWords val="32"/> --> produces: thirty-two 2) A paired tag which puts the body in a DIV with our team colors. Ex: <abc:teamColors school="gophers" reverse="true"> <p>Big game today</p> <p>Bring your lucky hat</p> <-- these will be green text on blue background </abc:teamColors> Details: The attribute for numAsWords will be just val, from 0 to 99 - spelling, etc... isn't important here. Print "twenty-six" or "Twenty six" ... . Attributes for teamColors are: school, a "required" string, and reversed, a non-required boolean. - pick any four schools. I picked gophers, cyclones, hawkeyes and cornhuskers - each school has two colors. Pick whatever seems best. For oine I picked "cyclones" and red text on a gold body - if…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program...Computer ScienceISBN:9781337102087Author:D. S. MalikPublisher:Cengage Learning
Programming Logic & Design ComprehensiveComputer ScienceISBN:9781337669405Author:FARRELLPublisher:Cengage
C++ for Engineers and ScientistsComputer ScienceISBN:9781133187844Author:Bronson, Gary J.Publisher:Course Technology Ptr
Systems ArchitectureComputer ScienceISBN:9781305080195Author:Stephen D. BurdPublisher:Cengage Learning
New Perspectives on HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScriptComputer ScienceISBN:9781305503922Author:Patrick M. CareyPublisher:Cengage LearningCOMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCEComputer ScienceISBN:9780357392676Author:FREUND, StevenPublisher:CENGAGE L
C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337102087
Author:D. S. Malik
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Programming Logic & Design Comprehensive
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337669405
Author:FARRELL
Publisher:Cengage
C++ for Engineers and Scientists
Computer Science
ISBN:9781133187844
Author:Bronson, Gary J.
Publisher:Course Technology Ptr
Systems Architecture
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305080195
Author:Stephen D. Burd
Publisher:Cengage Learning
New Perspectives on HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305503922
Author:Patrick M. Carey
Publisher:Cengage Learning
COMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCE
Computer Science
ISBN:9780357392676
Author:FREUND, Steven
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Computational Software for Intelligent System Design; Author: Cadence Design Systems;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLXZ6bM--j0;License: Standard Youtube License