Which of the following statements is correct and provides the best explanation when removing the first two electrons from calcium? Energy is released when either electron comes off because calcium is a metal and not very electronegative. It takes less energy to remove the second electron from calcium compared with the first because calcium wants to have eight electrons in its outer shell (and thus have a noble gas configuration. It takes less energy to remove the first electron compared with the second because it is in a higher energy level than the second electron. Electrons cannot be removed from calcium because it is a metal and only wants to gain electrons to become more stable. It takes more energy to remove the second electron compared with the first because the nucleus binds the electrons more tightly as each electron is removed.
Which of the following statements is correct and provides the best explanation when removing the first two electrons from calcium? Energy is released when either electron comes off because calcium is a metal and not very electronegative. It takes less energy to remove the second electron from calcium compared with the first because calcium wants to have eight electrons in its outer shell (and thus have a noble gas configuration. It takes less energy to remove the first electron compared with the second because it is in a higher energy level than the second electron. Electrons cannot be removed from calcium because it is a metal and only wants to gain electrons to become more stable. It takes more energy to remove the second electron compared with the first because the nucleus binds the electrons more tightly as each electron is removed.
Solution Summary: The author explains that each atom would like to achieve stable electronic configuration via removal of the electrons or acceptance of them.
Which of the following statements is correct and provides the best explanation when removing the first two electrons from calcium?
Energy is released when either electron comes off because calcium is a metal and not very electronegative.
It takes less energy to remove the second electron from calcium compared with the first because calcium wants to have eight electrons in its outer shell (and thus have a noble gas configuration.
It takes less energy to remove the first electron compared with the second because it is in a higher energy level than the second electron.
Electrons cannot be removed from calcium because it is a metal and only wants to gain electrons to become more stable.
It takes more energy to remove the second electron compared with the first because the nucleus binds the electrons more tightly as each electron is removed.
Which of the following species is a valid resonance structure of A? Use curved arrows to show how A is converted to any valid resonance structure. When a compound is not a valid resonance structurc of A, explain why not.
Provide steps and tips on what to look for to understand how to solve and apply to other problems.
N
IZ
Check the box under each structure in the table that is an enantiomer of the molecule shown below. If none of them are, check the none of the above box under
the table.
Molecule 1
Molecule 2
HN
Molecule 3
Х
HN
www.
Molecule 4
Molecule 5
Molecule 6
none of the above
NH
NH
G
Show work with explanation. don't give Ai generated solution
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
The Bohr Model of the atom and Atomic Emission Spectra: Atomic Structure tutorial | Crash Chemistry; Author: Crash Chemistry Academy;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apuWi_Fbtys;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY