Which is easier to get swinging, a baseball bat held at the end, or one held closer to the massive end (choked up)?
Whether it is easier to swing a baseball bat held at the end or held closer to the massive end.
Answer to Problem 3A
A baseball bat held closer to the massive end is easier to swing than a baseball bat held at the end.
Explanation of Solution
Introduction:
The rotational inertia is the resistance of an object that helps it in changing the rotational motion. The relation for the rotational inertia is,
Here,
The rotational inertia depends on the distribution of mass. Rotational inertia is affected by the distance between the axes of rotation and an object’s mass concentration. An increase in distance will increase rotational inertia. If the bat is choked up, then the rotational inertia will reduce which makes it easier to bring up the speed. The rotational inertia of the bat held nearer to the massive end is much less in comparison to the bat held at the end. Hence, a baseball bat held nearer to the heavier end is relatively easy to swing.
Conclusion:
Thus, a baseball bat that is held closer to the massive end will swingeasily in comparison to a baseball bat held at the end.
Chapter 12 Solutions
CONCEPTUAL PHYSICS-W/PRACTICING PHYSICS
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Applications and Investigations in Earth Science (9th Edition)
Campbell Essential Biology with Physiology (5th Edition)
Microbiology: An Introduction
Microbiology: An Introduction
Human Biology: Concepts and Current Issues (8th Edition)
Campbell Essential Biology (7th Edition)
- Fresnel lens: You would like to design a 25 mm diameter blazed Fresnel zone plate with a first-order power of +1.5 diopters. What is the lithography requirement (resolution required) for making this lens that is designed for 550 nm? Express your answer in units of μm to one decimal point. Fresnel lens: What would the power of the first diffracted order of this lens be at wavelength of 400 nm? Express your answer in diopters to one decimal point. Eye: A person with myopic eyes has a far point of 15 cm. What power contact lenses does she need to correct her version to a standard far point at infinity? Give your answer in diopter to one decimal point.arrow_forwardParaxial design of a field flattener. Imagine your optical system has Petzal curvature of the field with radius p. In Module 1 of Course 1, a homework problem asked you to derive the paraxial focus shift along the axis when a slab of glass was inserted in a converging cone of rays. Find or re-derive that result, then use it to calculate the paraxial radius of curvature of a field flattener of refractive index n that will correct the observed Petzval. Assume that the side of the flattener facing the image plane is plano. What is the required radius of the plano-convex field flattener? (p written as rho )arrow_forward3.37(a) Five free electrons exist in a three-dimensional infinite potential well with all three widths equal to \( a = 12 \, \text{Å} \). Determine the Fermi energy level at \( T = 0 \, \text{K} \). (b) Repeat part (a) for 13 electrons. Book: Semiconductor Physics and Devices 4th ed, NeamanChapter-3Please expert answer only. don't give gpt-generated answers, & please clear the concept of quantum states for determining nx, ny, nz to determine E, as I don't have much idea about that topic.arrow_forward
- 3.37(a) Five free electrons exist in a three-dimensional infinite potential well with all three widths equal to \( a = 12 \, \text{Å} \). Determine the Fermi energy level at \( T = 0 \, \text{K} \). (b) Repeat part (a) for 13 electrons. Book: Semiconductor Physics and Devices 4th ed, NeamanChapter-3Please expert answer only. don't give gpt-generated answers, & please clear the concept of quantum states for determining nx, ny, nz to determine E, as I don't have much idea about that topic.arrow_forwardNo chatgpt pls will upvotearrow_forwardUse the following information to answer the next question. Two mirrors meet an angle, a, of 105°. A ray of light is incident upon mirror A at an angle, i, of 42°. The ray of light reflects off mirror B and then enters water, as shown below: Incident ray at A Note: This diagram is not to scale. a Air (n = 1.00) Water (n = 1.34) 1) Determine the angle of refraction of the ray of light in the water. Barrow_forward
- Hi can u please solvearrow_forward6. Bending a lens in OpticStudio or OSLO. In either package, create a BK7 singlet lens of 10 mm semi-diameter and with 10 mm thickness. Set the wavelength to the (default) 0.55 microns and a single on-axis field point at infinite object distance. Set the image distance to 200 mm. Make the first surface the stop insure that the lens is fully filled (that is, that the entrance beam has a radius of 10 mm). Use the lens-maker's equation to calculate initial glass curvatures assuming you want a symmetric, bi-convex lens with an effective focal length of 200 mm. Get this working and examine the RMS spot size using the "Text" tab of the Spot Diagram analysis tab (OpticStudio) or the Spd command of the text widnow (OSLO). You should find the lens is far from diffraction limited, with a spot size of more than 100 microns. Now let's optimize this lens. In OpticStudio, create a default merit function optimizing on spot size.Then insert one extra line at the top of the merit function. Assign the…arrow_forwardNo chatgpt pls will upvote Already got wrong chatgpt answer .arrow_forward
- Use the following information to answer the next question. Two mirrors meet an angle, a, of 105°. A ray of light is incident upon mirror A at an angle, i, of 42°. The ray of light reflects off mirror B and then enters water, as shown below: A Incident ray at A Note: This diagram is not to scale. Air (n = 1.00) Water (n = 1.34) Barrow_forwardUse the following information to answer the next question. Two mirrors meet an angle, a, of 105°. A ray of light is incident upon mirror A at an angle, i, of 42°. The ray of light reflects off mirror B and then enters water, as shown below: A Incident ray at A Note: This diagram is not to scale. Air (n = 1.00) Water (n = 1.34) Barrow_forwardGood explanation it sure experts solve it.arrow_forward
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics (14th Edition)PhysicsISBN:9780133969290Author:Hugh D. Young, Roger A. FreedmanPublisher:PEARSONIntroduction To Quantum MechanicsPhysicsISBN:9781107189638Author:Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.Publisher:Cambridge University Press
- Physics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningLecture- Tutorials for Introductory AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9780321820464Author:Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina BrissendenPublisher:Addison-WesleyCollege Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio...PhysicsISBN:9780134609034Author:Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart FieldPublisher:PEARSON