Any rolling object takes more time to roll down an inclined plane than a non-rolling object sliding without friction. Jim says this is because all the PE of the non-rolling object goes into translational KE, with none 'wasted' as rotational KE. John doesn’t think a sliding object slides down an incline faster than a rolling object. With whom do you agree?
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
To identify: Whether any rolling object take more time to roll down an inclined plane or a non-rolling object sliding without friction.
Answer to Problem 29A
Agree with J, a rolling object would take the longer time roll down an inclined plane compared to a non-rolling object sliding down without friction.
Explanation of Solution
Introduction:
An object in curvilinear shape converts potential energy into translational and rotational kinetic energy which helps in rolling faster.
When a rolling object rolls down an incline then rotational kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy increase the momentum of the object. Because the rotational kinetic energy will help rolling objects to roll down and translational energy will help it move linearly down an incline. But, friction will also act upon the rolling object which decreases its motion.
In the case of a non-rolling object, when moves linearly down an incline without friction then there is no resistance opposing its motion. Thus, all its potential energy goes into translational kinetic energy only.
Conclusion:
Thus, a non-rolling object will slide down an incline faster than a rolling object without friction rolls down.
Chapter 12 Solutions
EP CONCEPTUAL PHYSICS-ONLINE ACCESS
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Genetic Analysis: An Integrated Approach (3rd Edition)
Microbiology with Diseases by Body System (5th Edition)
Human Biology: Concepts and Current Issues (8th Edition)
Campbell Essential Biology with Physiology (5th Edition)
Anatomy & Physiology (6th Edition)
Campbell Essential Biology (7th Edition)
- 3.63 • Leaping the River II. A physics professor did daredevil stunts in his spare time. His last stunt was an attempt to jump across a river on a motorcycle (Fig. P3.63). The takeoff ramp was inclined at 53.0°, the river was 40.0 m wide, and the far bank was 15.0 m lower than the top of the ramp. The river itself was 100 m below the ramp. Ignore air resistance. (a) What should his speed have been at the top of the ramp to have just made it to the edge of the far bank? (b) If his speed was only half the value found in part (a), where did he land? Figure P3.63 53.0° 100 m 40.0 m→ 15.0 marrow_forwardPlease solve and answer the question correctly please. Thank you!!arrow_forwardYou throw a small rock straight up from the edge of a highway bridge that crosses a river. The rock passes you on its way down, 5.00 s after it was thrown. What is the speed of the rock just before it reaches the water 25.0 m below the point where the rock left your hand? Ignore air resistance.arrow_forward
- Help me make a visualize experimental setup using a word document. For the theory below.arrow_forwardHow to solve this, given answerarrow_forwardThree point-like charges are placed at the corners of a square as shown in the figure, 28.0 cm on each side. Find the minimum amount of work required by an external force to move the charge q1 to infinity. Let q1=-2.10 μC, q2=+2.40 μС, q3=+3.60 μC.arrow_forward
- A point charge of -4.00 nC is at the origin, and a second point charge of 6.00 nC is on the x axis at x= 0.820 mm . Find the magnitude and direction of the electric field at each of the following points on the x axis. x2 = 19.0 cmarrow_forwardFour point-like charges are placed as shown in the figure, three of them are at the corners and one at the center of a square, 36.0 cm on each side. What is the electric potential at the empty corner? Let q1=q3=+26.0 µС, q2=-28.0 μC, and q4=-48.0μc Varrow_forwardPLS HELparrow_forward
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics (14th Edition)PhysicsISBN:9780133969290Author:Hugh D. Young, Roger A. FreedmanPublisher:PEARSONIntroduction To Quantum MechanicsPhysicsISBN:9781107189638Author:Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.Publisher:Cambridge University Press
- Physics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningLecture- Tutorials for Introductory AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9780321820464Author:Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina BrissendenPublisher:Addison-WesleyCollege Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio...PhysicsISBN:9780134609034Author:Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart FieldPublisher:PEARSON
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305952300/9781305952300_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780133969290/9780133969290_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781107189638/9781107189638_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337553278/9781337553278_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780321820464/9780321820464_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134609034/9780134609034_smallCoverImage.gif)