Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 1.2, Problem 1LO

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

02:36

Students have asked these similar questions

4.96 The breaking strengths for 1-foot-square samples of a particular synthetic fabric are approximately normally distributed with a mean of 2,250 pounds per square inch (psi) and a standard deviation of 10.2 psi. Find the probability of selecting a 1-foot-square sample of material at random that on testing would have a breaking strength in excess of 2,265 psi.4.97 Refer to Exercise 4.96. Suppose that a new synthetic fabric has been developed that may have a different mean breaking strength. A random sample of 15 1-foot sections is obtained, and each section is tested for breaking strength. If we assume that the population standard deviation for the new fabric is identical to that for the old fabric, describe the sampling distribution forybased on random samples of 15 1-foot sections of new fabric

Une Entreprise œuvrant dans le domaine du multividéo donne l'opportunité à ses programmeurs-analystes d'évaluer la performance des cadres supérieurs. Voici les résultats obtenues (sur une échelle de 10 à 50) où 50 représentent une excellente performance. 10 programmeurs furent sélectionnés au hazard pour évaluer deux cadres. Un rapport Excel est également fourni. Programmeurs Cadre A Cadre B 1 34 36 2 32 34 3 18 19 33 38 19 21 21 23 7 35 34 8 20 20 9 34 34 10 36 34 Test d'égalité des espérances: observations pairées

A television news channel samples 25 gas stations from its local area and uses the results to estimate the average gas price for the state. What’s wrong with its margin of error?

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 1.2, Problem 1LO

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

02:36

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 1.2, Problem 1LO

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

02:36

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 1.2, Problem 1LO

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

02:36

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer 12

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Answer 13

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Answer 14

Ch. 1.2 - Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of...Ch. 1.2 - Describe and identify an example of the method of...Ch. 1.2 - Describe and identify an example of the rational...Ch. 1.2 - Describe and identify an example of the empirical...Ch. 1.3 - Identify and describe the steps of the scientific...Ch. 1.3 - Prob. 6LO Ch. 1.3 - Prob. 7LO Ch. 1.3 - Prob. 8LO Ch. 1.3 - Explain the distinction between science and...Ch. 1.4 - Describe the difference between qualitative and...

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Concept explainers

Videos

Answer to Problem 1LO

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 1 Solutions