The results of a study on the effectiveness of line drying on the smoothness of fabric were summarized in the article “Line-Dried vs. Machine-Dried Fabrics: Comparison of Appearance, Hand, and Consumer Acceptance” (Home Econ. Research J., 1984: 27–35). Smoothness scores were given for nine different types of fabric and five different drying methods: (1) machine dry, (2) line dry, (3) line dry followed by 15-min tumble, (4) line dry with softener, and (5) line dry with air movement. Regarding the different types of fabric as blocks, construct an ANOVA table. Using a .05 significance level, test to see whether there is a difference in the true mean smoothness score for the drying methods.
Drying Method | ||||||
Fabric | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Crepe | 3.3 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 1.9 | |
Double knit | 3.6 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 2.3 | |
Twill | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |
Twill mix | 3.4 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 1.7 | |
Terry | 3.8 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 | |
Broadcloth | 2.2 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 1.9 | |
Sheeting | 3.5 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.2 | |
Corduroy | 3.6 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | |
Denim | 2.6 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
Test the hypothesis to see whether there is any significant difference in the mean smoothness score due to the drying methods at 5% level of significance.
Answer to Problem 50SE
There is sufficient of evidence to conclude that there is significant difference in the mean smoothness score due to the drying methods at 5% level of significance.
Explanation of Solution
The data shows the mean smoothness of the fabric for five levels of drying methods with nine different types of fabrics..
Calculation:
There is no significant difference in the mean smoothness with respect to the five levels of drying methods.
There is difference in the mean smoothness with respect to the five levels of drying methods.
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to find the test statistic using Minitab is given below:
- Click on Stat>ANOVA>Two-Way Analysis of Variance.
- Under Response, enter the column of mean smoothness.
- Under Row factor, enter the column of drying method.
- Under column factor, enter the column of fabric.
- Click OK.
Output obtained from MINITAB is given below:
Conclusion:
For drying methods:
The P-value for the drying methods is 0.000 and the level of significance is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is lesser than the level of significance.
That is,
Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected
Hence, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is an effect of drying methods on the mean smoothness of the fabric at 5% level of significance.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences
- An article in Plant Disease, "Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Rates on Severity of Xanthomonas Blight of Syngonium Podophyllum" (1989, Vol. 73, No. 12, pp. 972-975) showed the effect of the variable nitrogen and potassium rates on the growth of "White Butterfly" and the mean percentage of disease. Data representative of that collected in this experiment is provided in the following table. Potassium (mg/pot/wk) Nitrogen (mg/pot/wk) 30 90 120 50 60.8 60.8 45.5 43.0 60.0 58.4 150 54.4 56.1 53.8 51.6 34.5 35.5 250 42.9 40.0 36.1 37.9 33.0 33.3 (a) Use the analysis of variance to test the appropriate hypotheses with a = 0.05. The effect of the variable nitrogen significant, the effect of the potassium rates significant, the interaction between the variable nitrogen and potassium rates significant. (b) Graphically analyze the residuals from this experiment. The residuals acceptable. (c) Estimate the appropriate variance component. Round your answers to 2 decimal places. Source…arrow_forward27. No Variation in a Sample An experiment was conducted to test the effects of alcohol. Re- searchers measured the breath alcohol levels for a treatment group of people who drank ethanol and another group given a placebo. The results are given below (based on data from "Effects of Alcohol Intoxication on Risk Taking, Strategy, and Error Rate in Visuomotor Performance," by Streufert et al., Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, No. 4). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the two sample groups come from populations with the same mean. Treatment Group: nj 22, x¡ 0.049, s = 0.015 %3D %3D Placebo Group: n = 22, x, 0.000, s, = 0.000 %3D %3Darrow_forwardAn article in Lubrication Engineering (December 1990) described the results of an experiment designed to investigate the effects of carbon material properties on the progression of blisters on carbon face seals. The carbon face seals are used extensively in equipment such as air turbine starters. Four different carbon materials were tested, and the surface roughness was measured. The data are as follows: Carbon Material Type Surface Roughness EC10 0.5 0.55 0.55 0.36 EC10A 0.31 0.07 0.25 0.18 0.56 0.2 EC4 0.2 0.28 0.12 EC1 0.1 0.16 Does carbon material type have an effect on mean surface roughness? Use α = 0.05.arrow_forward
- The authors of the paper "Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement" compared two different instruments for measuring a subject's ability to breathe out air.+ (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) The two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen subjects participated in the study, and for each subject air flow was measured once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter. Mini- Subject Wright Meter 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 512 430 520 428 500 600 364 380 658 Wright Meter 494 395 516 434 476 557 413 442 650 Subject 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Mini- Wright Meter 445 432 626 260 477 259 350 451 Wright Meter 433 417 656 267 478 178 423 427 (a) Suppose that the Wright meter is considered to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. If the two types of meters produce different readings but there is a…arrow_forward10arrow_forward10arrow_forward
- Chest Injury Rating Car Driver Passenger Car Driver Passenger 1 42 35 10 36 37 2 42 35 11 36 37 3 34 45 12 43 58 4 34 45 13 40 42 5 45 45 14 43 58 6 40 42 15 37 41 7 42 46 16 37 41 8 43 58 17 44 57 9 45 43 18 42 42 Generate test results (α = .01) using data analysis (EXCEL).arrow_forwardPLEASE EXPLAIN HOW OPEN SURGERY CAN BE BETTER FOR BOTH STONE SIZES BUT WORSE IN TOTALarrow_forwardSelf-Reported Weight. The article “Accuracy of Self- Reported Height and Weight in a Community-Based Sample of Older African Americans and Whites” (Journal of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol. 65A, No. 10, pp. 1123–1129) by G. Fillenbaum et al. explores the relationship between measured and self-reported height and weight. The authors sampled African American and White women and men older than 70 years of age. A hypothesis test is to be performed to decide whether, on average, self-reported weight is less than measured weight for the aforementioned age group. a. identify the variable. b. identify the two populations. c. identify the pairs. d. identify the paired-difference variable. e. determine the null and alternative hypotheses. f. classify the hypothesis test as two tailed, left tailed, or right tailed.arrow_forward
- The article “Arsenic and Mercury in Lake Whitefish and Burbot Near the Abandoned Giant Mine on Great Slave Lake” (P. Cott, B. Zajdlik, et al., Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2016:223–232) presents measurements of arsenic concentrations in fish found in Northern Canada. a) In a sample of 8 whitefish caught in Yellowknife Bay, the mean arsenic concentration in the liver was 0.32 mg/kg, with a standard deviation of 0.05 mg/kg. Find a 95% confidence interval for the concentration in whitefish found in Yellowknife Bay. b) In a sample of 8 whitefish caught in Baker Pond, the mean arsenic concentration in the liver was 0.55 mg/kg, with a standard deviation of 0.36 mg/kg. Should the Student’s t distribution be used to find a 95% confidence interval for the concentration in whitefish found in Baker Pond? If so, find the confidence interval. If not, explain why not.arrow_forwardThe authors of the paper "Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement"† compared two different instruments for measuring a person's ability to breathe out air. (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) The two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen people participated in the study, and for each person air flow was measured once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter. Subject Mini-WrightMeter WrightMeter Subject Mini-WrightMeter WrightMeter 1 512 494 10 445 433 2 430 395 11 432 417 3 520 516 12 626 656 4 428 434 13 260 267 5 500 476 14 477 478 6 600 557 15 259 178 7 364 413 16 350 423 8 380 442 17 451 427 9 658 650 (a) Suppose that the Wright meter is considered to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. If the two types of meters produce different…arrow_forwardThe authors of the paper "Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement"† compared two different instruments for measuring a person's ability to breathe out air. (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) The two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen people participated in the study, and for each person air flow was measured once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter. Subject Mini-WrightMeter WrightMeter Subject Mini-WrightMeter WrightMeter 1 512 494 10 445 433 2 430 395 11 432 417 3 520 516 12 626 656 4 428 434 13 260 267 5 500 476 14 477 478 6 600 557 15 259 178 7 364 413 16 350 423 8 380 442 17 451 427 9 658 650 (a) Suppose that the Wright meter is considered to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. If the two types of meters produce…arrow_forward
- Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin HarcourtGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill