Chemistry In Focus
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781337399692
Author: Tro, Nivaldo J.
Publisher: Cengage Learning,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 42E
Interpretation Introduction
Interpretation:
Whether one would participate in a program where utility companies are providing a scheme, in which companies take back unused electricity in times of high solar energy and provide electricity at times of insufficient solar energy and the reason for this is to be determined.
Concept Introduction:
Coal and petroleum are fossil fuels that are getting depleted, day by day.
In today’s era, there is an urgent need for using alternatives for fossil fuels.
There are renewable resources that can be used to generate power.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The total power used by humans worldwide is approximately 15 TW (terawatts). Sunlight striking Earth provides 1.336 kW
per square meter (assuming no clouds). The surface area of Earth is approximately 197,000,000 square miles.
How much of Earth's surface would we need to cover with solar energy collectors to power the planet for use by all humans?
Assume that the solar energy collectors can only convert 10 % of the available sunlight into useful power.
Justify the use of these non renewable resources (metals and fuels) based on their properties.
A number of companies currently lease solar panels to homeowners to offset the home’s energy use. The total energy production of a certain residential solar system in suburban Maryland was 7581.62 kWh over the last calendar year. What mass of carbon dioxide did this solar system keep out of the atmosphere during that time, assuming that the energy consumed by this home would otherwise have been supplied solely by coal-burning power plants (note that this isn’t a great assumption, as Maryland also has a nuclear power plant, solar and wind farms, and Montgomery County incinerates waste to generate electricity)? Keep in mind that power plants are inefficient, and are able to convert on average 33% of the heat generated by the combustion of coal into electricity. Assume that coal can be approximated as C(s) (again, not a great assumption, but sufficient for this problem). Use the following data to find the heat of combustion of coal:
2 C(s) + O2(g) --> 2 CO(g)…
Chapter 10 Solutions
Chemistry In Focus
Ch. 10 - Prob. 10.1YTCh. 10 - Prob. 10.2YTCh. 10 - Prob. 1SCCh. 10 - Prob. 1ECh. 10 - Explain why hydroelectric power and wind power are...Ch. 10 - Prob. 3ECh. 10 - Prob. 4ECh. 10 - Prob. 5ECh. 10 - Prob. 6ECh. 10 - Prob. 7E
Ch. 10 - Prob. 8ECh. 10 - Prob. 9ECh. 10 - Prob. 10ECh. 10 - Prob. 11ECh. 10 - Prob. 12ECh. 10 - Prob. 13ECh. 10 - Prob. 14ECh. 10 - Prob. 15ECh. 10 - How does a geothermal power plant generate...Ch. 10 - Prob. 17ECh. 10 - Prob. 18ECh. 10 - Prob. 19ECh. 10 - Prob. 20ECh. 10 - Prob. 21ECh. 10 - Prob. 22ECh. 10 - Prob. 23ECh. 10 - Prob. 24ECh. 10 - Prob. 25ECh. 10 - Prob. 26ECh. 10 - Prob. 27ECh. 10 - Prob. 28ECh. 10 - Prob. 29ECh. 10 - Prob. 30ECh. 10 - Prob. 31ECh. 10 - Prob. 32ECh. 10 - Prob. 33ECh. 10 - Prob. 34ECh. 10 - Prob. 35ECh. 10 - Prob. 36ECh. 10 - Prob. 37ECh. 10 - Prob. 38ECh. 10 - Prob. 42ECh. 10 - Prob. 43E
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- The best solar panels currently available are about 15% efficient in converting sunlight to electricity. A typical home will use about 40. kWh of electricity per day (1 kWh = 1 kilowatt hour; 1kW = 1000 J/s). Assuming 8.0 hours of useful sunlight per day, calculate the minimum solar panel surface area necessary to provide all of a typical homes electricity. (See Exercise 124 for the energy rate supplied by the sun.)arrow_forwardPetroleum is a very valuable raw material for the synthesis of polymers. What if Congress decided that petroleum must be conserved as a raw material and could not be used as fuel? What could our society do for alternate sources of energy?arrow_forwardDefine the terms renewable and nonrenewable as applied to energy resources. Which of the following energy resources are renewable: solar energy, coal, natural gas, geothermal energy, wind power?arrow_forward
- Calculating Energy Use in Kilowatt-Hours What is the yearly cost of operating a 100-W television for 2 hours per day, assuming the cost of electricity is 15 cents per kilowatt-hour?arrow_forwardA number of companies currently lease solar panels to homeowners to offset the home’s energy use. The total energy production of a certain residential solar system in suburban Maryland was 7581.62 kWh over the last calendar year. What mass of carbon dioxide did this solar system keep out of the atmosphere during that time, assuming that the energy consumed by this home would otherwise have been supplied solely by coal-burning power plants (note that this isn’t a great assumption, as Maryland also has a nuclear power plant, solar and wind farms, and Montgomery County incinerates waste to generate electricity)? Keep in mind that power plants are inefficient, and are able to convert on average 33% of the heat generated by the combustion of coal into electricity. Assume that coal can be approximated as C(s) (again, not a great assumption, but sufficient for this problem). Use the following data to find the heat of combustion of coal: 2 C(s) + O2(g) ----> 2 CO(g).…arrow_forwardA number of companies currently lease solar panels to homeowners to offset the home’s energy use. The total energy production of a certain residential solar system in suburban Maryland was 7581.62 kWh over the last calendar year. What mass of carbon dioxide did this solar system keep out of the atmosphere during that time, assuming that the energy consumed by this home would otherwise have been supplied solely by coal-burning power plants (note that this isn’t a great assumption, as Maryland also has a nuclear power plant, solar and wind farms, and Montgomery County incinerates waste to generate electricity)? Keep in mind that power plants are inefficient, and are able to convert on average 33% of the heat generated by the combustion of coal into electricity. Assume that coal can be approximated as C(s) (again, not a great assumption, but sufficient for this problem). Use the following data to find the heat of combustion of coal: 2 C(s) + O2(g) --> 2 CO(g)…arrow_forward
- In 2008 the approximate energy consumption for the entire population of earth for an entire year was 4.74x10^20 joules. The sun's energy striking the earth is orders of magnitude greater than this...taking the whole surface aea of the earth for an entire year, there is approximately 1.33x 10^16 joules/miles striking the earth's surface per year. if a solar panel was 100% efficient, approximately how big would the surface area (with units of a mile) of the solar panel have to be to meet the energy needs of the people living on earth?arrow_forwardBoth coal and natural gas can be burned to generate electricity. However, burning natural gas produces about half the carbon dioxide emissions as burning coal to provide the same amount of energy. Why is it better for the environment to phase out coal-burning power plants in favor of natural gas-burning power plants?arrow_forwardConsider two coal-fired power plants that generate 5 x 1012 J of electricity daily. Plant A has an overall net efficiency of 38%. Plant B, a proposed replacement, would operate at higher temperatures with an overall net efficiency of 46%. The grade of coal used releases 30 kJ of heat per gram. Assume that coal is pure carbon. a. If 1000 kg of coal costs $30, what is the difference in daily fuel costs for the two plants? b. How many fewer grams of CO2 are emitted daily by Plant B, assuming complete combustion?arrow_forward
- Biofuels such as wood generate carbon dioxide when they are burned, but biofuels are nonetheless considered a partial solution to climate change. Why? Because plants take carbon dioxide out of the air as they grow, and burning them puts the same amount of carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere, so they are "carbon neutral". Because biofuels are more expensive than fossil fuels, so people will use less of them and generate less carbon dioxide. Because wood and other biofuels contain only a small amount of carbon, so they do not generate very much carbon dioxide when burned. Because wood and other biofuels generate a lot of ash when they burn, and this ash in the atmosphere cools down the Earth.arrow_forward5Assume that the amount of energy needed to raise the average temperature of the atmosphere by 0.4°C is 2 × 1021J. Estimate how much burned fuel would be needed to give rise to this increase, assuming this were the only cause of changes in the earth's temperature. Hint: Assume that coal has an energy density of 24 megajoules per kilogram.arrow_forwardWhat factors need to be controlled to make sure the comparison between fuels is reliable?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Chemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781337399074Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781133949640Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry for Engineering StudentsChemistryISBN:9781337398909Author:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom HolmePublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: Matter and ChangeChemistryISBN:9780078746376Author:Dinah Zike, Laurel Dingrando, Nicholas Hainen, Cheryl WistromPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Chemistry & Chemical Reactivity
Chemistry
ISBN:9781337399074
Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David Treichel
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry & Chemical Reactivity
Chemistry
ISBN:9781133949640
Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David Treichel
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: Principles and Practice
Chemistry
ISBN:9780534420123
Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward Mercer
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry for Engineering Students
Chemistry
ISBN:9781337398909
Author:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom Holme
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: Matter and Change
Chemistry
ISBN:9780078746376
Author:Dinah Zike, Laurel Dingrando, Nicholas Hainen, Cheryl Wistrom
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
The Laws of Thermodynamics, Entropy, and Gibbs Free Energy; Author: Professor Dave Explains;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8N1BxHgsoOw;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY