Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences)
Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences)
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781260152203
Author: William J Stevenson
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 10, Problem 2.2CQ
Summary Introduction

To determine: The difference shown by the second set of sample from the first one.

Introduction

Company TT is a division of company DM. It was about to launch a new product. Ms. MY, the production manager, asked her assistant JM to check the capability of the oven. JM collected 18 random samples from each of the 20 pieces. After the analysis, the samples proved to be incapable based on the specification width of 1.44 cm.

Table 1

Sample Mean Range
1 45.01 0.85
2 44.99 0.89
3 45.02 0.86
4 45 0.91
5 45.04 0.87
6 44.98 0.9
7 44.91 0.86
8 45.04 0.89
9 45 0.85
10 44.97 0.91
11 45.11 0.84
12 44.96 0.87
13 45 0.86
14 44.92 0.89
15 45.06 0.87
16 44.94 0.86
17 45 0.85
18 45.03 0.88

Quiet disappointed with the end results, the manager was figuring out ways to improve the process and free the capital expenditure of $10,000. A former professor suggested going for more samples with less sample sizes. JM conducted the analysis on 27 samples of 5 observations each and the results are tabulated below:

Table 2

Sample Mean Range
1 44.96 0.42
2 44.98 0.39
3 44.96 0.41
4 44.97 0.37
5 45.02 0.39
6 45.03 0.4
7 45.04 0.39
8 45.02 0.42
9 45.08 0.38
10 45.12 0.4
11 45.07 0.41
12 45.02 0.38
13 45.01 0.41
14 44.98 0.4
15 45 0.39
16 44.95 0.41
17 44.94 0.43
18 44.94 0.4
19 44.87 0.38
20 44.95 0.41
21 44.93 0.39
22 44.96 0.41
23 44.99 0.4
24 45 0.44
25 45.03 0.42
26 45.04 0.38
27 45.03 0.4

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 2.2CQ

The second sample reveals the changes in the process more clearly than the first set of data.

Explanation of Solution

Given information:

Table 3

Sample Mean Range
1 45.01 0.85
2 44.99 0.89
3 45.02 0.86
4 45 0.91
5 45.04 0.87
6 44.98 0.9
7 44.91 0.86
8 45.04 0.89
9 45 0.85
10 44.97 0.91
11 45.11 0.84
12 44.96 0.87
13 45 0.86
14 44.92 0.89
15 45.06 0.87
16 44.94 0.86
17 45 0.85
18 45.03 0.88

Formula:

Mean Chart:

UCL=X¯¯+A2R¯LCL=X¯¯-A2R¯

Difference shown by the second set of sample from the first one:

Date set:1

Table 4

Sample Mean Range
1 45.01 0.85
2 44.99 0.89
3 45.02 0.86
4 45 0.91
5 45.04 0.87
6 44.98 0.9
7 44.91 0.86
8 45.04 0.89
9 45 0.85
10 44.97 0.91
11 45.11 0.84
12 44.96 0.87
13 45 0.86
14 44.92 0.89
15 45.06 0.87
16 44.94 0.86
17 45 0.85
18 45.03 0.88
45 0.872777778

Excel worksheet:

Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences), Chapter 10, Problem 2.2CQ , additional homework tip  1

From factors of three-sigma chart, for n=20, A2 = 0.18; D3 = 0.41; D4 = 1.59

Mean control chart:

X¯¯=i=118X¯n=809.9818=45

Range control chart:

R¯=i=118Rn=15.7118=0.873

Upper control limit:

UCL=X¯¯+A2R¯=45+(0.18×0.873)=45.156

The upper control limit is calculated by adding the product of 0.18 and 0.873 with 45, which yields 45.156.

Lower control limit:

UCL=X¯¯-A2R¯=45(0.18×0.873)=44.842

The lower control limit is calculated by subtracting the product of 0.18 and 0.873 with 45, which yields 44.842.

A graph is plotted using the UCL, LCL and samples values.

Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences), Chapter 10, Problem 2.2CQ , additional homework tip  2

Diagram 1

Date set: 2

Table 5

Sample Mean Range
1 44.96 0.42
2 44.98 0.39
3 44.96 0.41
4 44.97 0.37
5 45.02 0.39
6 45.03 0.4
7 45.04 0.39
8 45.02 0.42
9 45.08 0.38
10 45.12 0.4
11 45.07 0.41
12 45.02 0.38
13 45.01 0.41
14 44.98 0.4
15 45 0.39
16 44.95 0.41
17 44.94 0.43
18 44.94 0.4
19 44.87 0.38
20 44.95 0.41
21 44.93 0.39
22 44.96 0.41
23 44.99 0.4
24 45 0.44
25 45.03 0.42
26 45.04 0.38
27 45.03 0.4
44.9959 0.40111

Excel worksheet:

Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences), Chapter 10, Problem 2.2CQ , additional homework tip  3

From factors of three-sigma chart, for n=20, A2 = 0.58

Mean control chart:

X¯¯=i=127X¯n=1214.8927=44.99

Range control chart:

R¯=i=127Rn=10.8327=0.4011

Upper control limit:

UCL=X¯¯+A2R¯=44.99+(0.58×0.401)=45.229

The upper control limit is calculated by adding the product of 0.58 and 0.401 with 44.99, which yields 45.229.

Lower control limit:

UCL=X¯¯-A2R¯=44.99(0.58×0.401)=44.763

The lower control limit is calculated by subtracting the product of 0.58 and 0.401 with 44.99, which yields 44.763.

Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences), Chapter 10, Problem 2.2CQ , additional homework tip  4

Diagram 2

On comparing Diagrams 1 and 2, it is evident that the second set of data has closer range of changes while the first set of data is scattered and reveals no information about the changes in the process.

Hence, the second sample reveals the changes in the process changes more clearly than the first set of data.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Summarize chapters 1 through 8 of the book "food and beverage cost control"
Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this thoroughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that the LA warehouse becomes temporarily or even indefinitely disabled since facing a large-scale labor disruption. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis:  Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary The Constraint Scenario exhibits a higher total cost of $7,424,575.45 compared to the What-if Scenario's total cost of $6,611,905.60, signifying a difference of approximately $812,669.85, which indicates a more expensive operation in the Constraint Scenario. The average service time is slightly higher in the Constraint Scenario (0.72 days vs. 0.70 days), suggesting that the What-if Scenario provides a marginally quicker service. Moreover, the average end-to-end service time…
Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this throughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that Dallas plant has lost power. It cannot serve the DCs anymore and has to remain locked indefinitely. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis:  Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary In comparing the Constraint Scenario to the What-if Scenario, a few key differences highlight the efficiencies evident in the supply chain. Firstly, the total cost in the Constraint Scenario is lower at $7,424,575.45, while the What-if Scenario incurs a total cost of $7,486,369.12, resulting in a cost delta of $61,793.67. Additionally, although both scenarios exhibit the same average service time of 0.72 days, the What-if Scenario has a more favorable average end-to-end service time of 2.41…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Operations Management
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:9781337386920
Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Foundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...
Marketing
ISBN:9781285193946
Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:Cengage Learning