Consider the following combinatorial identity: ∑ k = 0 n k ( n k ) = n • 2 n − 1 a. Present a combinatorial argument for this identity by considering a set of n people and determining, in two ways, the number of possible selections of a committee of any size and a chairperson for the committee. Hint: i. How many possible selections are there of a committee of size k and its chairperson? ii. How many possible selections are there of a chairperson and the other committee members? b. Verify the following identity for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 : ∑ k = 1 n k ( n k ) = 2 n − 2 n ( n + 1 ) For a combinatorial proof of the preceding, consider a set of n people and argue that both sides of the identity represent the number of different selections of a committee, its chairperson, and its secretary (possibly the same as the chairperson). Hint: How many different selections result in the committee containing exactly k people? How many different selections are there in which the chairperson and the secretary are the same? How many different selections result in the chairperson and the secretary being different? c. Now argue that ∑ k = 1 n ( n k ) k 3 = 2 n − 3 n 2 ( n + 3 )
Consider the following combinatorial identity: ∑ k = 0 n k ( n k ) = n • 2 n − 1 a. Present a combinatorial argument for this identity by considering a set of n people and determining, in two ways, the number of possible selections of a committee of any size and a chairperson for the committee. Hint: i. How many possible selections are there of a committee of size k and its chairperson? ii. How many possible selections are there of a chairperson and the other committee members? b. Verify the following identity for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 : ∑ k = 1 n k ( n k ) = 2 n − 2 n ( n + 1 ) For a combinatorial proof of the preceding, consider a set of n people and argue that both sides of the identity represent the number of different selections of a committee, its chairperson, and its secretary (possibly the same as the chairperson). Hint: How many different selections result in the committee containing exactly k people? How many different selections are there in which the chairperson and the secretary are the same? How many different selections result in the chairperson and the secretary being different? c. Now argue that ∑ k = 1 n ( n k ) k 3 = 2 n − 3 n 2 ( n + 3 )
Consider the following combinatorial identity:
∑
k
=
0
n
k
(
n
k
)
=
n
•
2
n
−
1
a. Present a combinatorial argument for this identity by considering a set of n people and determining, in two ways, the number of possible selections of a committee of any size and a chairperson for the committee.
Hint:
i. How many possible selections are there of a committee of size k and its chairperson?
ii. How many possible selections are there of a chairperson and the other committee members?
b. Verify the following identity for
n
=
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
:
∑
k
=
1
n
k
(
n
k
)
=
2
n
−
2
n
(
n
+
1
)
For a combinatorial proof of the preceding, consider a set of n people and argue that both sides of the identity represent the number of different selections of a committee, its chairperson, and its secretary (possibly the same as the chairperson).
Hint:
How many different selections result in the committee containing exactly k people?
How many different selections are there in which the chairperson and the secretary are the same?
How many different selections result in the chairperson and the secretary being different?
c. Now argue that
∑
k
=
1
n
(
n
k
)
k
3
=
2
n
−
3
n
2
(
n
+
3
)
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, probability and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Linear Equation | Solving Linear Equations | What is Linear Equation in one variable ?; Author: Najam Academy;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHm3X_Ta_iE;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY