You and a good friend are supposed to meet in Paris, France. You know you have arranged to meet at either the Arc de Triomphe (AdT) or at the base of the Eiffel Tower (ET) but you cannot remember which and you cannot communicate with each other. You prefer the Arc de Triomphe. Your friend prefers the Eiffel Tower. But you both much prefer to be together rather than apart. If you and your friend each arrive at the Arc de Triomphe, your payoff is 15 and your friend’s payoff is 9. If you and your friend each arrive at the Eiffel Tower, you friend’s payoff is 15 but your payoff is 9. If you go to the Arc de Triomphe and your friend goes to the Eiffel Tower, your payoff is 6 and your friend’s payoff is 6. If you go to the Eiffel Tower and your friend goes to the Arc de Triomphe, your payoff is 3 and your friend’s payoff is 3. If it helps, you can think of these payoffs as units of enjoyment or utility you and your friend derive from the outcomes. (As you recall, while firms maximize profits, individuals maximize utility). Assume that this is a single-play, non-repeated game. Construct a payoff matrix with two choices for each player: ET (for Eiffel Tower strategy) and AdT (for Arc de Triomphe) strategy. Fill the cells with the correct payoffs. Please put yourself on top and your friend on the left side of your payoff matrix. Do you have a dominant strategy? Does your friend have a dominant strategy? Of the 4 possible outcomes, identify which one(s), if any, satisfy the conditions of a Nash Equilibrium. Explain your logic.
You and a good friend are supposed to meet in Paris, France. You know you have arranged to meet at either the Arc de Triomphe (AdT) or at the base of the Eiffel Tower (ET) but you cannot remember which and you cannot communicate with each other. You prefer the Arc de Triomphe. Your friend prefers the Eiffel Tower. But you both much prefer to be together rather than apart. If you and your friend each arrive at the Arc de Triomphe, your payoff is 15 and your friend’s payoff is 9. If you and your friend each arrive at the Eiffel Tower, you friend’s payoff is 15 but your payoff is 9. If you go to the Arc de Triomphe and your friend goes to the Eiffel Tower, your payoff is 6 and your friend’s payoff is 6. If you go to the Eiffel Tower and your friend goes to the Arc de Triomphe, your payoff is 3 and your friend’s payoff is 3. If it helps, you can think of these payoffs as units of enjoyment or utility you and your friend derive from the outcomes. (As you recall, while firms maximize profits, individuals maximize utility). Assume that this is a single-play, non-repeated game. Construct a payoff matrix with two choices for each player: ET (for Eiffel Tower strategy) and AdT (for Arc de Triomphe) strategy. Fill the cells with the correct payoffs. Please put yourself on top and your friend on the left side of your payoff matrix. Do you have a dominant strategy? Does your friend have a dominant strategy? Of the 4 possible outcomes, identify which one(s), if any, satisfy the conditions of a Nash Equilibrium. Explain your logic.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
You and a good friend are supposed to meet in Paris, France. You know you have arranged to meet at either the Arc de Triomphe (AdT) or at the base of the Eiffel Tower (ET) but you cannot remember which and you cannot communicate with each other.
You prefer the Arc de Triomphe. Your friend prefers the Eiffel Tower. But you both much prefer to be together rather than apart.
- If you and your friend each arrive at the Arc de Triomphe, your payoff is 15 and your friend’s payoff is 9.
- If you and your friend each arrive at the Eiffel Tower, you friend’s payoff is 15 but your payoff is 9.
- If you go to the Arc de Triomphe and your friend goes to the Eiffel Tower, your payoff is 6 and your friend’s payoff is 6.
- If you go to the Eiffel Tower and your friend goes to the Arc de Triomphe, your payoff is 3 and your friend’s payoff is 3.
If it helps, you can think of these payoffs as units of enjoyment or utility you and your friend derive from the outcomes. (As you recall, while firms maximize profits, individuals maximize utility). Assume that this is a single-play, non-repeated game.
- Construct a payoff matrix with two choices for each player: ET (for Eiffel Tower strategy) and AdT (for Arc de Triomphe) strategy. Fill the cells with the correct payoffs. Please put yourself on top and your friend on the left side of your payoff matrix.
- Do you have a dominant strategy?
- Does your friend have a dominant strategy?
- Of the 4 possible outcomes, identify which one(s), if any, satisfy the conditions of a Nash Equilibrium. Explain your logic.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 6 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education