Why was slavery less prevalent in the New England colonies? A) New England colonies' climate and soil inhibited their ability to grow labor-intensive ash crops, thereby negating their need for a large labor force. (They had a more diverse economy that was not dependent upon slave-labor) B) New Englanders used Native America labor instead C) New Englanders were inherently less racist compared to Southerners D) It was too expensive to transport enslaved people to the northern colonies
The prevalence of slavery in the New England colonies was significantly lower than in the Southern colonies. While slavery played a significant role in the economies of Southern colonies, the reasons behind its absence in New England were multifaceted. Among the reasons given, New England colonies' climate and soil inhibited their ability to grow labor-intensive ash crops, thereby negating their need for a large labor force. Additionally, New England's economy was more diverse and not reliant on slave labor, and it was too expensive to transport enslaved people to the northern colonies. The following essay will explore the factors behind New England's lower prevalence of slavery and analyze the significance of this contrast between the Northern and Southern colonies in terms of the region's history and development.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
