Why did Judge Richard baumgartner's misconduct on the bench go unreported by other court personnel?
Q: How can what you discovered research be beneficial to criminal justice?
A: Research plays a crucial role in the field of criminal justice. It helps in understanding crime…
Q: What are your views on the issue of the Fair Sentencing Act?
A: The Fair Sentencing Act was passed in 2010 and represented an important issue in the realm of…
Q: Your attorney has recently interviewed Dr. Willard smith, who suffered an anaphylactic reaction to a…
A: The objective of this question is to determine whether Dr. Smith has a valid legal claim against the…
Q: It's suspected that the adulterated Magentum some businesses dumped into the sewer is what is…
A: Concerns about how some corporate operations affect the environment have surfaced recently. In…
Q: how lying is used “ethically” in police work, and how it is used “unethically”.
A: An ethical activity means an act that abides by moral guidelines. While an unethical activity means…
Q: he central issues in Crimes Requiring Proof of Mental Fault revolve around the criminal justice…
A: Criminal Psychology & Motivation is related to studying various components such as intent,…
Q: What are Town and Village Justice Courts?
A: Town and village courts are all in all known as the Justice Courts. Numerous New Yorkers will have…
Q: Why is it important that a defendant be “competent” to stand trial? Should the government be allowed…
A: Note: Third part of the question is subjective and hence cannot be answered as per Bartleby…
Q: Pricilla had a dress custom designed and made for her twenty-fifth wedding anniversary celebration.…
A: The objective of this question is to determine the standard that a judge is likely to apply in a…
Q: Assume that adulterating Magentum is a strict liability crime and a tort. Which of the following…
A: In legal contexts, strict liability crimes and torts involve offenses for which liability is imposed…
Q: Did the California Supreme Court correctly decide the Kasky case? Why or why not?
A: Kasky v. Nike, Inc. (2002)The California Supreme Court's ruling in the Kasky case was founded on a…
Q: 3. What protection under human rights law does an individual have who has been denied employment…
A: Human rights law comprises various provisions that deal with certain rules and rights for employees…
Q: 1. What is business law?
A: Commercial law or business law is the assortment of law which oversees business and trade and is…
Q: Do you believe that judicial review is a good thing for American democracy? Why or why not?
A: Note: This is a generalized answer Judicial review refers to a country's courts' ability to assess…
Q: how do you think that the court system can gain more trust from the public? Additionally how do you…
A: The court system alludes to the coordinated construction and cycles through which legal questions…
Q: Donald McNeese worked in the tax department of one of Prudential Insurance Company’s Florida offices…
A: The correct answer is B. personal deviance.Personal deviance refers to actions that violate…
Q: Some legal scholars believe that judges can and should 'make law' while other legal scholars believe…
A: Note: The answer has been framed in a generalized manner.A key component of legal government, the…
Q: Explain how the action of an administrative agency (federal or state) affected you. This could be…
A: Note: Providing source/citation is against our Q&A guidelines. The answer is provided in a…
Q: How can an organization effectively align its management practices and decision-making processes…
A: The alignment of an organization's management practices and decision-making processes with its…
Q: Compare and contrast the Durham and substantial capacity insanity tests with the M’Naghten test.…
A: The Durham Test also termed the product test, establishes that individuals cannot be held criminally…
Q: The Tyco scandal of 2002 clearly demonstrates that the firm’s moral compass was askew. In the…
A: Interviewing important players in the Tyco affair would be my first step as an investigator in order…
Q: Based on the Taco Bell case (1982), how would the courts determine misleading or deceptive conduct?
A: The Taco Bell case from 1982 is a pivotal example of how courts determine whether conduct is…
Q: What does a prosecutor need to convict a defendant for conspiracy to counterfeit U.S. dollars?
A: When investigating cases of conspiracy to counterfeit U.S. dollars, a comprehensive approach is…
Q: do some basic research into a case that is before the U.S. Supreme Court right now: Jack Daniel’s…
A: VIP Products LLC specializes in making dog toys, and one of its products is a series of toys called…
Q: Thoughts regarding the Classical Theory of crime causation? How can the courts use the presentence…
A: The Classical Theory of crime causation, originating in the 18th century with thinkers like Cesare…
Q: 1. The prohibits unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other unsolicited conduct…
A: The statement describes a prohibition against unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors,…
Q: 1.What issue(s) must the court decide in this case? 2. If you were a member of the jury, how would…
A: In this case, the court must decide if Mental Health Retardation Hospital (MHRH) unlawfully…
Q: After reading Alberta's contributory negligence legislation, choose the statement below that is…
A: Contributory negligence legislation is a set of legal concepts and rules that govern how liability…
Q: 29) The_____ , passed in 1938 and frequently amended, sets a minimum wage and requires overtime pay…
A: The minimum wage rate means the lowest wage per hour. This wage rate is mandated under labour laws.…
Q: Which of the following Equal Employment Opportunity Legislations places the burden of proof on the…
A: Here, all the acts that are given in the question, these could include Equal employment opportunity…
Q: What are the factors which will allow a court to pierce the corporate veil
A: A corporate veil is a concept or term in business or corporates, that aims to separate a corporate…
Q: The amount and controversy and a diversity of citizenship case must be more than $1 million before…
A: "The solution has been Provided in a generalized Manner". The jurisdiction of federal courts in the…
Q: At both federal and state levels there are civil and criminal courts. What types of cases are…
A: Introduction: The court system in the United States operates at both the federal and state levels.…
Why did Judge Richard baumgartner's misconduct on the bench go unreported by other court personnel?
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
- You own a small business in Baldwin County, Georgia. One of your employees got busted out at Lake Sinclair (county jurisdiction, NOT city) for a first drug violation, which is considered a misdemeanor. Though you do not condone being high the job, you want to be there to support him. review the "Hot Sheet" for 2019 pertaining to this court; what are three examples of the types of cases that come before that court (jurisdiction)? I can not find a Hot sheet anywhere.2) Punitive Damages: Regardless of whether you feel the case was an appropriate one for strict liability, was the McDonald's coffee case an appropriate case for the award of punitive damages? Look over the requirements for punitive damages and assess whether the jury award was appropriate in this case. Why or why not?Should criminal justice managers be concerned with the personal aspects of employees’ lives?
- Wally is a world-famous LSU shoe quarterback who is known for his ability to quite literally throw away the game when it matters most. One day, during his rigorous shoe throwing exercbes, be negligently knocks an innocent civilian unconscious with a stray purple and gold cleat. Wally was promptly arrested and taken to jail to await trial. The judge assigned to his trial happened to be a passionate Gator fan who was excited about a potential national championship season for his beloved Florida football team, which Wally had spoiled a few years ago with yet another stray cleat. As a result of the judge's (understandable) resentment towards Wally's previous national championship sabotaging episode, the judge sentenced Wally to a lifetime in prison for his current crime. The judge's comically harsh sentence could be described by which of the following legal theories? O Legal Realism Utilitarianism Natural Law Egalitarianism O The Historical SchoolHow does the Court hierarchy impact on the development of our law?In business, how can you be required to testify at multiple depositions and also at trial?
- What role does comity play in the Court’s analysis in Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. (page 647)? Why does the Court in Empagran reject the case-by-case approach to comity suggested by the respondents? Only typing answer Please explain step by stepIs Nurse Jones' disclosure to Paris Lights of Terrence's condition permitted and required by stateor federal law?Does the concept of judicial interpretation of the law mean that judges can make whatever law they wish? And, how can courts remain flexible, if they are required to follow precedent?
- To successfully win a negligence lawsuit, what are the "elements" the plaintiff must prove and what three affirmative defenses are available to the defendant?What is this slide talking about, provide with simple example.You own a small business in Baldwin County, Georgia. One of your employees got busted out at Lake Sinclair (county jurisdiction, NOT city) for a first drug violation, which is considered a misdemeanor. Though you do not condone being high the job, you want to be there to support him. (1) What court would he appear in for his arraignment in Baldwin County (identify the court and the name of the judge)?