What did the defeat of the Nazis mean for the idea of "White Supremacy"?
Related questions
Question
What did the defeat of the Nazis mean for the idea of "White Supremacy"?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13e8b/13e8b8891333cebeba1af2dbb1bc6e37ff43b328" alt="The Winds of Change
While the biological determinism of "race
science" dominated Western thought from the middle
of the nineteenth century to the second world war, it
began to face increasingly serious challenges as the
century progressed. "Race science" made three
fundamental assertions:
The first was that there are distinct "racial"
groups identifiable by physical appearance.
The second was that particular psychological
traits such as character, intelligence and morality
were biologically determined and that "racial" groups
differed in these respects as well as in their physical
appearance.
Finally, it was maintained that these
biologically determined traits were responsible for
cultural and linguistic differences between "racial"
groups.
Ironically it was the scientific pretensions of
these assertions that eventually led to their downfall.
As scientific testing in both the physical and social
sciences became increasingly sophisticated, the
assertions of race science were undermined and
disproved
The first problem was the identification of
racial groups. As the 20th century progressed,
biologists became more and more skeptical of their
ability to deliver a methodology of racial
classification. (Barkan, 1992, p 137) The more data
on head shape, bone structure and other
measurements of physical anthropology that were
gathered, the more impossible it became to actually
classify "racial" groups. It became clear that there
were a range of inherited physical characteristics
across the human population and that attempts to
divide this population into distinct races was
completely arbitrary. Later, as genetic science
developed, it was demonstrated that the way people
looked was attributable to the interaction of
combinations of genes, and that human beings
shared a common genetic heritage with only minor
variations. While notions of "race" based on the way
people looked (phenotype) might have a social
significance in the way people were treated,
understanding of our complex, and common genetic
heritage (genotype) meant that "race" was no longer
an acceptable scientific category."
Transcribed Image Text:The Winds of Change
While the biological determinism of "race
science" dominated Western thought from the middle
of the nineteenth century to the second world war, it
began to face increasingly serious challenges as the
century progressed. "Race science" made three
fundamental assertions:
The first was that there are distinct "racial"
groups identifiable by physical appearance.
The second was that particular psychological
traits such as character, intelligence and morality
were biologically determined and that "racial" groups
differed in these respects as well as in their physical
appearance.
Finally, it was maintained that these
biologically determined traits were responsible for
cultural and linguistic differences between "racial"
groups.
Ironically it was the scientific pretensions of
these assertions that eventually led to their downfall.
As scientific testing in both the physical and social
sciences became increasingly sophisticated, the
assertions of race science were undermined and
disproved
The first problem was the identification of
racial groups. As the 20th century progressed,
biologists became more and more skeptical of their
ability to deliver a methodology of racial
classification. (Barkan, 1992, p 137) The more data
on head shape, bone structure and other
measurements of physical anthropology that were
gathered, the more impossible it became to actually
classify "racial" groups. It became clear that there
were a range of inherited physical characteristics
across the human population and that attempts to
divide this population into distinct races was
completely arbitrary. Later, as genetic science
developed, it was demonstrated that the way people
looked was attributable to the interaction of
combinations of genes, and that human beings
shared a common genetic heritage with only minor
variations. While notions of "race" based on the way
people looked (phenotype) might have a social
significance in the way people were treated,
understanding of our complex, and common genetic
heritage (genotype) meant that "race" was no longer
an acceptable scientific category.
Expert Solution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00039/00039eaf710a9765f6db01fc5b9812260bf5cade" alt=""
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cbe/e0cbe7c1cfa79a285a06530332b315bcf077d9a4" alt="Blurred answer"