Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
1. Is this author a Federalist or Anti-Federalist? How can you tell? (Use at least two pieces of the text to help you answer this.)

1. Is this author a Federalist or Anti-Federalist? How can you tell? (Use at least two pieces of the text to help you answer this.)

icon
Related questions
Question
I need a better understanding
2: The Constitut X 由 https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1175LoRpgBNBJN7rn5BTPB32YzHYKBMj61wyeiXWcHs8/edit#slide=id.g87... pter 2: The Constitution and Its Origins (Online) 个▼ O Slideshow A Share - Insert Format Slide Arrange Tools Add-ons Help Last edit was 11 minutes ago 田 Background Layout - Theme Transition 8. 9 .. 4 Excerpt Two: 1. Is this author a Federalist or Anti-Federalist? The most considerable of the remaining objections is that the plan of the convention contains no bill of rights... [Bills of rights] have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain thing they have no need of particular reservations. "WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ORDAIN and ESTABLISH this Constitution for the United States of America."... How can you tell? (Use at least two pieces of the text to help you answer this.) very Type your answer here. I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to daim more than were granted. For why declare that things chall pot shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? ... Click to add speaker notes Explore 5:53 PM Co search 63°F Sunny 1/29/2022
Transcribed Image Text:2: The Constitut X 由 https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1175LoRpgBNBJN7rn5BTPB32YzHYKBMj61wyeiXWcHs8/edit#slide=id.g87... pter 2: The Constitution and Its Origins (Online) 个▼ O Slideshow A Share - Insert Format Slide Arrange Tools Add-ons Help Last edit was 11 minutes ago 田 Background Layout - Theme Transition 8. 9 .. 4 Excerpt Two: 1. Is this author a Federalist or Anti-Federalist? The most considerable of the remaining objections is that the plan of the convention contains no bill of rights... [Bills of rights] have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain thing they have no need of particular reservations. "WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ORDAIN and ESTABLISH this Constitution for the United States of America."... How can you tell? (Use at least two pieces of the text to help you answer this.) very Type your answer here. I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to daim more than were granted. For why declare that things chall pot shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? ... Click to add speaker notes Explore 5:53 PM Co search 63°F Sunny 1/29/2022
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer