Using the Web, find three customizable customer loyalty program systems being sold by vendors. Create a table like PE Table 5-2 that compares them.

Principles of Management
OER 2019th Edition
ISBN:9780998625768
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax
Chapter17: Organizational Planning And Controlling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 6CRQ: Briefly describe the two views of the goal formulation process, and explain how they differ.
icon
Related questions
Question

5-31. Using the Web, find three customizable customer loyalty program systems being sold by vendors. Create a table like PE Table 5-2 that compares them.

Although the customer loyalty project at Petrie's Electronics had gone slowly at first, the
past few weeks had been fast paced and busy, Jim Watanabe, the project manager,
thought to himself. He had spent much of his time planning and conducting interviews
with key stakeholders inside the company. He had also worked with the marketing group
to put together some focus groups made up of loyal customers, to get some ideas about
what they would value in a customer loyalty program. Jim had also spent some time
studying customer loyalty programs at other big retail chains and those in other
industries as well, such as the airlines, known for their extensive customer loyalty
programs. As project manager, he had also supervised the efforts of his team members.
Together, they had collected a great deal of data. Jim had just finished creating a high-
level summary of the information into a table he could send to his team members (PE
Table 5-1 D).
From the list of requirements, it was clear that he and his team did not favor building a
system from scratch in-house. Jim was glad that the team felt that way. Not only was
building a system like this in-house an antiquated practice, it was expensive and time
consuming. As nice as it might have been to develop a unique system just for Petrie's,
there was little point in reinventing the wheel. The IT staff would customize the system
interface, and there would be lots of work for Sanjay's staff in integrating the new system
and its related components with Petrie's existing systems, but the core of the system
would have already been developed by someone else.
Just as he was finishing the e-mail he would send to his team about the new system's
requirements and constraints, he received a new message from Sanjay. He had asked
Sanjay to take the lead in scouting out existing customer loyalty systems that Petrie's
could license. Sanjay had conducted a preliminary investigation that was now complete.
His e-mail contained the descriptions of three of the systems he had found and studied
(PE Table 5-2 L). Obviously, Jim and his team would need to have a lot more
information about these alternatives, but Jim was intrigued by the possibilities. He sent a
reply to Sanjay, asking him to pass the alternatives on to the team, and also asking him
to prepare a briefing for the team that would include more detailed information about
each alternative.
Transcribed Image Text:Although the customer loyalty project at Petrie's Electronics had gone slowly at first, the past few weeks had been fast paced and busy, Jim Watanabe, the project manager, thought to himself. He had spent much of his time planning and conducting interviews with key stakeholders inside the company. He had also worked with the marketing group to put together some focus groups made up of loyal customers, to get some ideas about what they would value in a customer loyalty program. Jim had also spent some time studying customer loyalty programs at other big retail chains and those in other industries as well, such as the airlines, known for their extensive customer loyalty programs. As project manager, he had also supervised the efforts of his team members. Together, they had collected a great deal of data. Jim had just finished creating a high- level summary of the information into a table he could send to his team members (PE Table 5-1 D). From the list of requirements, it was clear that he and his team did not favor building a system from scratch in-house. Jim was glad that the team felt that way. Not only was building a system like this in-house an antiquated practice, it was expensive and time consuming. As nice as it might have been to develop a unique system just for Petrie's, there was little point in reinventing the wheel. The IT staff would customize the system interface, and there would be lots of work for Sanjay's staff in integrating the new system and its related components with Petrie's existing systems, but the core of the system would have already been developed by someone else. Just as he was finishing the e-mail he would send to his team about the new system's requirements and constraints, he received a new message from Sanjay. He had asked Sanjay to take the lead in scouting out existing customer loyalty systems that Petrie's could license. Sanjay had conducted a preliminary investigation that was now complete. His e-mail contained the descriptions of three of the systems he had found and studied (PE Table 5-2 L). Obviously, Jim and his team would need to have a lot more information about these alternatives, but Jim was intrigued by the possibilities. He sent a reply to Sanjay, asking him to pass the alternatives on to the team, and also asking him to prepare a briefing for the team that would include more detailed information about each alternative.
PE TABLE 5-2:
Alternatives for Petrie's Customer Loyalty Project
Alternative A
Data warehousing-centered system designed and licensed by Standard Basic Systems,
Inc. (SBSI). The data warehousing tools at the heart of the system were designed and
developed by SBSI, and work with standard relational database management systems
(DBMSS) and relational/object-oriented (O0) hybrid DBMSS. The SBSI tools and approach
have been used for many years and are well known in the industry, but SBSI-certified staff
are essential for implementation, operation, and maintenance. The license is relatively
expensive. The customer loyalty application using the SBSI data warehousing tools is an
established application, used by many retail businesses in other industries.
Alternative B
Customer relationship management (CRM)-centered system designed and licensed by
XRA Corporation. XRA is a pioneer in CRM systems, so its CRM is widely recognized as
an industry leader. The system includes tools that support customer loyalty programs. The
CRM system itself is large and complex, but pricing in this proposal is based only on
modules used for the customer loyalty application.
Alternative C
Proprietary system designed and licensed by Nova Innovation Group, Inc. The system is
relatively new and leading edge, so it has only been implemented in a few sites. The
vendor is truly innovative but small and inexperienced. The customer interface, designed
for a standard Web browser, is stunning in its design and is extremely easy for customers
to use to check on their loyalty program status. The software runs remotely, in the "cloud,"
and data related to the customer loyalty program would be stored in the cloud too.
Transcribed Image Text:PE TABLE 5-2: Alternatives for Petrie's Customer Loyalty Project Alternative A Data warehousing-centered system designed and licensed by Standard Basic Systems, Inc. (SBSI). The data warehousing tools at the heart of the system were designed and developed by SBSI, and work with standard relational database management systems (DBMSS) and relational/object-oriented (O0) hybrid DBMSS. The SBSI tools and approach have been used for many years and are well known in the industry, but SBSI-certified staff are essential for implementation, operation, and maintenance. The license is relatively expensive. The customer loyalty application using the SBSI data warehousing tools is an established application, used by many retail businesses in other industries. Alternative B Customer relationship management (CRM)-centered system designed and licensed by XRA Corporation. XRA is a pioneer in CRM systems, so its CRM is widely recognized as an industry leader. The system includes tools that support customer loyalty programs. The CRM system itself is large and complex, but pricing in this proposal is based only on modules used for the customer loyalty application. Alternative C Proprietary system designed and licensed by Nova Innovation Group, Inc. The system is relatively new and leading edge, so it has only been implemented in a few sites. The vendor is truly innovative but small and inexperienced. The customer interface, designed for a standard Web browser, is stunning in its design and is extremely easy for customers to use to check on their loyalty program status. The software runs remotely, in the "cloud," and data related to the customer loyalty program would be stored in the cloud too.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Management
Principles of Management
Management
ISBN:
9780998625768
Author:
OpenStax
Publisher:
OpenStax College