Using only government websites or peer reviewed sources, answer the following questions specifically in refard to the United States' catch share program for the Atlantic Wolffish. Fully cite all sources in-text: Species managed and management authority, name of the catch share program type, and date established Region/ecosystem; marine or freshwater Catch share background (How were shares allocated? Are they transferable? How many shares? Was there community involvement in allocation (including indigenous peoples?)) Do you believe that allocation of catch shares was fair in your examples? Regarding your US program, was allocation reflective of what you read in “Who Owns America’s Fisheries?” including the statement, “the founding idea of federal fisheries policy is that the living resources in the nation’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) are the property of all U.S. citizens” (Macinko & Bromley, 2002). Discuss any similarities or differences in allocation of shares for the program in the US and the foreign, Iceland catch share program for the Wolffish. Catch share specifics of the US catch share program for the Wolffish vs. the Icelandic Wolffish catch share program. (What happened regarding the fishery after implementation? Did catch effort decrease? Did landings increase? Has the catch share been “successful” and how? Has it been “unsuccessful” and why?) Comparison: In addition to the allocation of shares, what other similarities or differences did you see between the US Wolffish Catch Share and Icelandic Wolffish Catch share programs? Were there differences in available data? Were there similarities? Speculate on why these exist.

Applications and Investigations in Earth Science (9th Edition)

9th Edition

ISBN:9780134746241

Author:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. Tasa

Publisher:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. Tasa

Chapter1: The Study Of Minerals

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1LR

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Using only government websites or peer reviewed sources, answer the following questions specifically in refard to the United States' catch share program for the Atlantic Wolffish. Fully cite all sources in-text:

Species managed and management authority, name of the catch share program type, and date established
Region/ecosystem; marine or freshwater
Catch share background (How were shares allocated? Are they transferable? How many shares? Was there community involvement in allocation (including indigenous peoples?))
Do you believe that allocation of catch shares was fair in your examples? Regarding your US program, was allocation reflective of what you read in “Who Owns America’s Fisheries?” including the statement, “the founding idea of federal fisheries policy is that the living resources in the nation’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) are the property of all U.S. citizens” (Macinko & Bromley, 2002). Discuss any similarities or differences in allocation of shares for the program in the US and the foreign, Iceland catch share program for the Wolffish.
Catch share specifics of the US catch share program for the Wolffish vs. the Icelandic Wolffish catch share program. (What happened regarding the fishery after implementation? Did catch effort decrease? Did landings increase? Has the catch share been “successful” and how? Has it been “unsuccessful” and why?)
Comparison: In addition to the allocation of shares, what other similarities or differences did you see between the US Wolffish Catch Share and Icelandic Wolffish Catch share programs? Were there differences in available data? Were there similarities? Speculate on why these exist.

AI-Generated Solution

AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.