This figure below shows the payoffs involved when Sarah and Joe work on a school project together for a single grade. They both will enjoy a higher grade when more effort is put into the project, but they also get pleasure from goofing off and not working on the project. The payoffs can be thought of as the utility each would get from the effort they individually put forth and the grade they jointly receive. Seh Lew et Lew Effut The outcome of the game in the figure shown will be: Multiple Choice Joe puts forth high effort and Sarah puts forth low effort. Joe puts forth low effort and Sarah puts forth high effort. Joe and Sarah both put forth low effort. Joe and Sarah both put forth high effort.

This figure below shows the payoffs involved when Sarah and Joe work on a school project together for a single grade. They both will enjoy a higher grade when more effort is put into the project, but they also get pleasure from goofing off and not working on the project. The payoffs can be thought of as the utility each would get from the effort they individually put forth and the grade they jointly receive. Seh Lew et Lew Effut The outcome of the game in the figure shown will be: Multiple Choice Joe puts forth high effort and Sarah puts forth low effort. Joe puts forth low effort and Sarah puts forth high effort. Joe and Sarah both put forth low effort. Joe and Sarah both put forth high effort.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

5
31 Joe Low Effort Sarah Low Effort High Effort 7 7 High Effort 15 5 13 6 10 9 The figure shown represents the payoffs involved when Sarah and Joe work on a school project together for a single grade. They both will enjoy a higher grade when more effort is put into the project, but they also get pleasure from goofing off and not working on the project. The payoffs can be thought of as the utility each would get from the effort they individually put forth and the grade they jointly receive. What payoff can we predict Joe will receive as the outcome of this game? Multiple Choice О О 5 7 О 13
Question 2. Two students are working together to submit their Microeconomics mid-semester group coursework. Each student i can put in the effort x; that costs c(x;), in which x; E [0, 1]. This gives each student the utility of u(x1, x2). Formu- late this situation as a strategic game.
Asaaap
Brian and Matt own the only two bicycle repair shops in town. Each must choose between a low price for repair work and a high price. The yearly economic profits from each strategy are indicated in Figure bellow. The upper right side of each rectangle shows Brian's profits; the lower left side shows Matt's profits. Matt's Actions Low Price High Price Low Price Brian's Actions $1,500 $1,500 $200 $3,000 High Price $5,000 $200 $4,000 $4,000 Which of the following statements is correct for a one-trial game? The market equilibrium price is the low price. A market equilibrium price cannot be established unless Brian and Matt collude. A market equilibrium price cannot be established unless Brian or Matt engages in tit-for-tat strategy. A market equilibrium price cannot be established without repeated trials. The market equilibrium price is the high price.
Player 1 Cooperate (C) Defect (D) Cooperate (C) 3,3 8,0 Player 2 Defect (D) 0,8 1,1 In general, a combination of strategies is a Nash equilibrium if ... Every player is choosing a best response against the other players' strategies. Every player has a positive payoff. The players maximize the sum of their payoffs. The players choose identical strategies. If the game is repeated, which cooperative actions could benefit both players? O Both players choose C. Player 1 chooses C, Player 2 chooses D. O Player 1 chooses D, Player 2 chooses C. Both players choose D.
John and Jane usually vote against each other’s party in the SSC elections resulting to negating or offsetting their votes. If they vote for their party of choice, each of them gains four units of utility (and lose four units of utility from a vote against their party of choice). However, it costs each of them two units of utility for the hassle of actually voting during the SSC elections. A. Diagram a game in which John and Jane choose whether to vote or not to vote.
7
The chicken game has often been used to model crises. Recall that in this game, the two players drive straight at each other. They can choose to swerve or keep going straight. If one swerves, and the other goes straight, assume that the one that swerves gets -10 utility and the one that goes straight gets 10 utility, since the one that swerves is deemed the loser. If both swerve, both get 0 utility. If both go straight, they crash and get -50 utility. Assume both players have a discount rate of 0.9 Draw the stage game of date night List all pure strategy Nash equilibria of the single stage game Consider an infinite horizon version of Chicken. Can you get an SPNE in which the both players swerve using a grim trigger type strategy? Consider the following strategies: both players swerve, as long as neither ever went straight. If one player ever plays straight, in all subsequent rounds the player that swerved goes straight and the player that went straight swerves. Can you think…
Image attched
John and Jane usually vote against each other’s party in the SSC elections resulting to negating or offsetting their votes. If they vote for their party of choice, each of them gains four units of utility (and lose four units of utility from a vote against their party of choice). However, it costs each of them two units of utility for the hassle of actually voting during the SSC elections. A. Diagram a game in which John and Jane choose whether to vote or not to vote. B. Suppose John and Jane is in agreement not to vote during the election. 1.) Would such an agreement improve utility? Justify your answer. 2.) Would such an agreement be an equilibrium? Justify your answer.
acsdk xbnxnw edjqbs snxq