"there was ne streng evidence" that the prepertion of women whe became pregnant while taking HGH along with IVE was greater than the success rate for VF alene. (a) Is this consistent with testing Mo: HGH in addrion to tvr increases the chance of petting pregnant versus M HGH in addbon to VF does not increase the chance of getting pregnant or with testing Mgi HGH in addnion te IVF does not inerease the chance of getting pregnant versus H, HGH in addtion to tv inereases the chance of getting pregnant? O Mgi HGH in addition to tVF increases the chance of getting pregnant versus M, HGH in adetien to IVF does net inerease the chance of getting pregnant O Mg: HGH in addition to IVF does net increase the chance of getting pregnant versus Ni HGH in adotien to IVF increases the chance of getting pregnant Explain. O The null hypothesis is considered a statement of no dfference, or equality. In this case, HGH in addtion to V does increase the chance of getting pregnant. O The rull hypethesis is considered a statement of no efference, or equality. In this case, HGH in addition to VF doesn't increase the chance of getting pregnant. O The null hypothesis is considered a statement of difference, or nen-equality. In this case, HGH in addtion to V doesn't increase the chance of getting pregnant. O The null hypethesis is considered a statement of dfference, or nen-equality. In this case, HGH in addtion te VE doesn't decrease the chance of getting pregnant. O The null hypothesis is considered a statement of aifference, or nen-equality. In this case., HGH in addtion to V does increase the chance of getting pregnant. (b) Does the stated conclusion of "ne strong evidence" indicate that the null hypethesis was rejected? Explain. O Yes. The statement of "ne strong evidence" is referring to no strong evidence in suppert of the null hypothesis. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. O ves. The statement of "no strong evidence is referring to no strong evidence in support of the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the nul hypothesis was rejected. O No. The statement of "ne strong evidence" is referring to no strong evidence in suppert of the null hypothesis. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis is accepted. O No. The statement of "no strong evidence" is referring to no strong evidence in support of the null hypothesis. Therefore, the null hypothesis was not rejected. O No. The statement of "no strong evidence" is referring to no strong evidence in suppert of the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the null hypothesis was net rejected.