There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher caring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their cheating behavior based on perceptions of how their teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their classes is okay. Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes. The scores below represent judgments of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample (a higher number means it is more acceptable to cheat). Is there a difference in the student ratings of how acceptable it is to cheat based on teacher type? Use an ANOVA with a = .05 to determine whether there are any significant differences among the three types of teachers in the acceptability of cheating based on student ratings. Fill in missing values in the data table and then show all work for the 4 steps of hypothesis testing Poor Teacher Average Teacher Good Teacher T = 20 ΣΧ2 = 393 G = T = 36 T = 16 SS = 30 SS = 33 SS = 42 N = n = 6 n = 8 n = = 10 M = M = M= = k =
There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher caring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their cheating behavior based on perceptions of how their teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their classes is okay. Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes. The scores below represent judgments of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample (a higher number means it is more acceptable to cheat). Is there a difference in the student ratings of how acceptable it is to cheat based on teacher type? Use an ANOVA with a = .05 to determine whether there are any significant differences among the three types of teachers in the acceptability of cheating based on student ratings. Fill in missing values in the data table and then show all work for the 4 steps of hypothesis testing Poor Teacher Average Teacher Good Teacher T = 20 ΣΧ2 = 393 G = T = 36 T = 16 SS = 30 SS = 33 SS = 42 N = n = 6 n = 8 n = = 10 M = M = M= = k =
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
![There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher
caring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their cheating behavior based on perceptions of how their
teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their classes is okay.
Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes.
The scores below represent judgments of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample (a higher number means it is
more acceptable to cheat). Is there a difference in the student ratings of how acceptable it is to cheat based on teacher type?
Use an ANOVA with a = .05 to determine whether there are any significant differences among the three types of teachers in the
acceptability of cheating based on student ratings. Fill in missing values in the data table and then show all work for the 4 steps of
hypothesis testing
Poor Teacher
Average Teacher
Good Teacher
T = 20
ΣΧ2 = 393
G =
T = 36
T = 16
SS = 30
SS = 33
SS = 42
N =
n =
6
n = 8
n = = 10
M =
M =
M=
=
k =](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F4bb143e2-932b-4fb2-a4da-057168b2554b%2Fff444fce-3807-416d-840b-d93f75d867fa%2Fiv2upfm_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher
caring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their cheating behavior based on perceptions of how their
teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their classes is okay.
Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes.
The scores below represent judgments of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample (a higher number means it is
more acceptable to cheat). Is there a difference in the student ratings of how acceptable it is to cheat based on teacher type?
Use an ANOVA with a = .05 to determine whether there are any significant differences among the three types of teachers in the
acceptability of cheating based on student ratings. Fill in missing values in the data table and then show all work for the 4 steps of
hypothesis testing
Poor Teacher
Average Teacher
Good Teacher
T = 20
ΣΧ2 = 393
G =
T = 36
T = 16
SS = 30
SS = 33
SS = 42
N =
n =
6
n = 8
n = = 10
M =
M =
M=
=
k =
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134683416/9780134683416_smallCoverImage.gif)
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
![The Basic Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319042578/9781319042578_smallCoverImage.gif)
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
![Introduction to the Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319013387/9781319013387_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman