The question I had to solve was: Let S be the set of real numbers.  If a, b are elements of S, define a related to b if a-b is an integer.  Show that the relation is an equivalence relation on S.  Describe the equivalence classes of S. I was able to show that it is an equivalence relation, and so I don't need help with that.  The question is what am I supposed to write for a description of the equivlance classes of S.  Actually, I am able to come up with what an equivalence class looks like--it is the set of elements, say x,  in the real numbers such that x=a+k for some integer k.  My understanding is that the equivalence classes partition the set and that the union of all the equivalence classes would equal the entire set S.  Since the equivalence classes consist of only integers, how can their union be the set of real numbers?  As an example, the equivalence class of say, the square root of 3 is the empty set.  Yet when you union all the equivalence classes, you will not get the real numbers, just the integers.  Hope this all makes sense and that you can clear up the confusion I'm having.  Thanks!

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

The question I had to solve was:

Let S be the set of real numbers.  If a, b are elements of S, define a related to b if a-b is an integer.  Show that the relation is an equivalence relation on S.  Describe the equivalence classes of S.

I was able to show that it is an equivalence relation, and so I don't need help with that.  The question is what am I supposed to write for a description of the equivlance classes of S.  Actually, I am able to come up with what an equivalence class looks like--it is the set of elements, say x,  in the real numbers such that x=a+k for some integer k.  My understanding is that the equivalence classes partition the set and that the union of all the equivalence classes would equal the entire set S.  Since the equivalence classes consist of only integers, how can their union be the set of real numbers?  As an example, the equivalence class of say, the square root of 3 is the empty set.  Yet when you union all the equivalence classes, you will not get the real numbers, just the integers.  Hope this all makes sense and that you can clear up the confusion I'm having.  Thanks!

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Relations
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,