The pricing strategies of MTN and Vodacom are shown in the table below. They must decide whether tocharge a high or low price for their internet service. The four pairs of payoff values represent what eachcompany expects to earn or lose in millions of rands, depending on the pricing strategy chosen by the othercompany.Vodacom's PriceStrategyMTN's Price StrategyHigh PriceLow PriceHigh PriceVodacom +R200200Vodacom-R100 MTN +R500.Low Pricea) Vodacom will charge a low price; MTN will charge a high price.b) Vodacom will charge a high price; MTN will charge a low price..c) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a low price.d) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a high price.Vodacom +R500 MTN-R100Vodacom+R100 MTN+R100If it's expected that the incomes of people living in rural South Africa is expected to increase, what will the equilibriumoutcome be, ceteris paribus?

Game theory analyzes strategic interactions; it's the study of decision-making when the outcome…

The pricing strategies of MTN and Vodacom are shown in the table below. They must decide whether to charge a high or low price for their internet service. The four pairs of payoff values represent what each company expects to earn or lose in millions of rands, depending on the pricing strategy chosen by the other company. N Vodacom's Price Strategy S MTN's Price Strategy High Price Low Price High Price Vodacom +R200 MTN+R200 g Vodacom-R100 N+R500 a) Vodacom will charge a low price; MTN will charge a high price. Low Price if we If it's expected that the incomes of people living in rural South Africa is expected to increase, what will the equilibrium outcome be, ceteris paribus? b) Vodacom will charge a high price; MTN will charge a low price.. c) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a low price. d) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a high price. Vodacom +R500 MTN-R100 Vodacom+R100 MTN+R100

The pricing strategies of MTN and Vodacom are shown in the table below. They must decide whether to charge a high or low price for their internet service. The four pairs of payoff values represent what each company expects to earn or lose in millions of rands, depending on the pricing strategy chosen by the other company. N Vodacom's Price Strategy S MTN's Price Strategy High Price Low Price High Price Vodacom +R200 MTN+R200 g Vodacom-R100 N+R500 a) Vodacom will charge a low price; MTN will charge a high price. Low Price if we If it's expected that the incomes of people living in rural South Africa is expected to increase, what will the equilibrium outcome be, ceteris paribus? b) Vodacom will charge a high price; MTN will charge a low price.. c) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a low price. d) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a high price. Vodacom +R500 MTN-R100 Vodacom+R100 MTN+R100

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

option c
Consider the following strategic interaction between two Australia telecommuncation companies deciding to set the prices of their ‘unlimited calls‘ mobile package.Try to explain the business reasons behind the relationships between the various payoffs. For example, why is Low the best response to the opponent playing High? Why is the payoff from (High,High) higher for both players than from (Medium, Medium)?
Match the definition to each term listed below. Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Definition A table that shows the payoffs each firm earns from every combination of firm strategies An agreement among firms to charge the same price or otherwise not to compete An option that is better than any alternative option regardless of what the other firm does An outcome of a strategic game from which neither rival wants to deviate A game outcome in which players seek to increase their mutual payoff A practice where one firm initiates a price change and the other firms follow the leader A game in which the firms choose their strategies at the same time One firm's gain must equal the other firm's loss A game in which the sum of Firms select their optimal strategies in a single time period without regard to possible interactions in subsequent time periods A game that occurs more than once the two firms' outcomes is positive Instructions: Enter a numeric response corresponding to the number of the…
a. Consider the game faced by the British and Dutch managers when both are given contracts that compensate them with (1)/(2) of 1% of revenue. The strategic form game is shown. Find the Nash equilibria. b. Now consider the game between the British and Dutch shareholders as to what kind of contracts to give their managers. Assume that they simultaneously choose between a contract that gives the manager 1% of profit and one that gives him (1)/(2) of 1% of revenue. Assume, as before, that the shareholders’ payoff is profit (and we ignore the trivial amount that they pay to their managers). After a pair of contracts is selected, the two contracts are revealed to both managers, and the managers then choose between supply levels of low, moderate, and high. Find all SPNE.
AP CollegeBoard Test Booklet Unit 4 Problem Set Include correctly labeled diagrams, if useful or required, in explaining your answers. A correctly labeled diagram must have all axes and curves clearly labeled and must show directional changes. If the question prompts you to “Calculate," you must show how you arrived at your final answer. Use the graph provided below to answer parts (a)-(e). Marginal Cost Average Total Cost Average Variable Cost 108 100 55 Demand 0 10 21 31 44 57 77 Quantity Marginal Revenue BigMed, a profit-maximizing firm, has a patent on a medical device, making it the only producer of that device. The graph above shows BigMed's demand, marginal revenue, average total cost, average variable cost, and marginal cost curves. (a) Calculate BigMed's total revenue if the firm produces the allocatively efficient quantity. Show your work. (b) Starting at a price of $100, if BigMed were to increase the price by 2%, will the quantity demanded decrease by more than 2%, by less…
Suppose Fiat recently entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Case for $4.3 billion. Prior to the merger, the market for four-wheel-drive tractors consisted of five firms. The market was highly concentrated, with a Herfindahl- Hirschman index of 2,650. Case's share of that market was 18 percent, while Fiat comprised just 9 percent of the market. If approved, by how much would the postmerger Herfindahl-Hirschman index increase? Based only on this information, is the Justice Department likely to challenge the merger according to the Horizontal Merger Guidelines? Possibly - but other factors will be considered Yes Ο NO
If the price match policy is a good idea, how widely should it be advertised? Explain. You woke up this morning to a troubling advertisement on TV: A+ Rental Cars' local competitor is discounting their economy rentals. After doing a little digging, you discover that your competitor has launched an aggressive advertising campaign, reducing the price on their economy line from $32.99 to $24.99. Based on your knowledge of previous pricing practices, you expect a similar price reduction across all vehicle types.
Suppose that Firm 1 and Firm 2 are Stackelberg competitors in the market for popsicles. Firm 1 is the leader and Firm 2 is the follower. They have the same cost functions such that MC = 4. Market demand for popsicles is given by QD = 38 – 0.5P. Use this information to answer questions #1 and #2. 1. How many popsicles will Firm 1 produce in the SPE of this game? a. 91 6 b. q1 = 9 12 91 d. 91 с. 18 e. q1 = 36 %3D 2. If these firms were Cournot competitors, then compared to the outcome in #1 (Hint: No calculations necessary.) a. Firm 1 would earn more profit, and Firm 2 would earn less profit. b. Firm 1 would earn less profit, and firm 2 would earn more profit. c. Both firms would earn less profit. d. Both firms would earn more profit. The firms' profits would be the same, but industry-wide profit would be lower.