The estimated negative cash flows for three design alternatives are shown below. The MARR is 13% per year and the study period is four years. Which alternative is best based on the IRR method? Doing nothing is not an option. Capital investment Annual expenses ΕΟΥ 0 A. Alternative B B. Alternative A C. Alternative C 1-4 A $82,400 6,200 Alternative B $64,500 12,100 C $71,900 9,550 Which alternative would you choose as a base one? Choose the correct answer below.

The estimated negative cash flows for three design alternatives are shown below. The MARR is 13% per year and the study period is four years. Which alternative is best based on the IRR method? Doing nothing is not an option. Capital investment Annual expenses ΕΟΥ 0 A. Alternative B B. Alternative A C. Alternative C 1-4 A $82,400 6,200 Alternative B $64,500 12,100 C $71,900 9,550 Which alternative would you choose as a base one? Choose the correct answer below.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Compare three alternatives on the basis of their capitalized costs at i=9.00% per year and select the best alternative. (Include a minus sign if necessary.) The capitalized cost of alternative E is $ ox, alternative F is $1375347.55, and alternative G is $ The best alternative is
The following five alternatives that are evaluated by the rate of return method, If the alternatives are independent and the MARR is 15% per year, the onels) to select is (are) Incremental ROR, N. When Compared with Alternative Initial Investment,S Alternative Alternative A BC DE 10.6 27.3 194 353 25.0 -25,000 -35,000 13.1 38.5 24.4 -40,000 13.4 46.5 27.3 26.8 -60,000 25.4 -75,000 20.2 Only D O Only D and E O Only A D, and E O Only E
A city tnat operates automobile parking facilities is evaluating a proposal to erect and operate a structure for parking in its downtown area. Three designs for a facility to be built on available sites have been identified as follows, where all dollar figures are in thousands: Design A Design B Design C Cost of site $240 $180 $200 Cost of building $2,200 $700 $1,400 Annual fee collection $830 $750 $600 Annual maintenance cost $410 $360 $310 Service life 30 years 30 years 30 years At the end of the estimated service life, the selected facility would be torn down and the land would be sold. It is estimated that the proceeds from the resale of the land will be equal to the cost of clearing the site. If the city's interest rate is known to be 10%, which design alternative would be selected on the basis of the benefit-cost criterion?
Based on PW values, determine which of the following independent projects should be selected for investment if $240,000 is available and the MARR is 10% per year. (NCF = net cash flow) Project Initial Investment, $ NCF, $/Year Life, Years A −100,000 50,000 8 B −125,000 24,000 8 C −120,000 75,000 8 D −220,000 39,000 8 E −200,000 82,000 8
Five mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for providing a sewage- treatment facility. The annual equivalent costs and estimated benefits of the alternatives are as follows: Alternative E Annual Equivalent (in thousands) Cost $1,050 Benefits $1,110 900 $1,810 1,230 $1,390 1,350 $1,500 990 $1,140 Which plan, if any, should be adopted if the Sewage Authority wishes to invest if, and only if, the B-C ratio is at least 1.0.?
Which of the following interpretations would be best for the scenario analysis results shown below? Worst- case PW (18%) -$650,000 IRR 2.10% Most- likely case Best-case $58,000 $2,660,000 33% 14.60% a. Since the most-likely case has a PW <0, the project should be abandoned immediately b. Since the worst-case has a negative present worth, this project must be rejected. c. Since the average of the three cases is a positive present worth, the project is acceptable. d. Because only one of the scenarios shows the project as profitable, the project should be considered very risky, and, if accepted, should be subject to greater scrutiny in its planning and forecasting.