Five mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for providing a sewage-treatment facility. The annual equivalent costs and estimated benefits of the alternativesare as follows:AlternativeAnnual Equivalent (in thousands)Cost$1,050Benefits$1,110B900$1,810C1,230$1,390D1,350$1,500E990$1,140Which plan, if any, should be adopted if the Sewage Authority wishes to invest if, andonly if, the B-C ratio is at least 1.0.?

The Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (B-C ratio) is an economic metric used to assess the desirability of a…

Five mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for providing a sewage- treatment facility. The annual equivalent costs and estimated benefits of the alternatives are as follows: Alternative B Annual Equivalent (in thousands) Cost Benefits $1,050 $1,110 900 $1,810 1,230 $1,390 1,350 $1,500 990 $1,140 Which plan, if any, should be adopted if the Sewage Authority wishes to invest if, and only if, the B-C ratio is at least 1.0.?

Five mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for providing a sewage- treatment facility. The annual equivalent costs and estimated benefits of the alternatives are as follows: Alternative B Annual Equivalent (in thousands) Cost Benefits $1,050 $1,110 900 $1,810 1,230 $1,390 1,350 $1,500 990 $1,140 Which plan, if any, should be adopted if the Sewage Authority wishes to invest if, and only if, the B-C ratio is at least 1.0.?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The two alternatives shown are under consideration for improving security at a facility. Determine which one should be selected, if any, based on a B/C analysis. Consider an interest rate of 7% per year and a 10-year study period. Additional information is provided in Table Q 6(b). Page 4 of 5 Table Q 6(b) Alternative 1: Extra Cameras | Alternative 2: New Sensors First cost, $ Annual O&M cost, $ 38000 87000 49000 64000 Annual benefits, $ Annual disbenefits, $ 110000 160000 26000
Required information A government-funded wind-based electric power generation company in the southern part of the country has developed the following estimates (in $1000) for a new turbine farm. The MARR is 10% per year and the project life is 25 years. Benefits: $45,000 in year 0; $27,500 in year 3 Government savings: $2,000 in years 1 through 20 Cost: $50,000 in year O Disbenefits: $3000 in years 1 through 10 NOTE: This is a multi-part question. Once an answer is submitted, you will be unable to return to this part. Calculate the Pl value. The Pl value is
As part of the rehabilitation of the downtown area of a southern U.S. city, the Parks and Recreation Department expects to develop the space below several overpasses into basketball, handball, miniature golf, and tennis courts. The estimates are initial cost of $182,000; life of 20 years and, annual M&O costs of $24,000. The department expects 30,000 people per year to use the facilities an average of 2 hours each. The value of the recreation has been conservatively set at $1.1 per hour. At a discount rate of 10% per year, what is the B/C ratio for the project? The B/C ratio is
In a certain city the promotion of tourism in the city is being considered. It will cost $6,000 to develop the plan. The anticipated annual benefits and costs are as follows: • Annual benefits: Increased local revenue and tax collection $117,400 • Annual support service: expansion of parking lots, restrooms, surveillance and street repairs $48,830 If the city government uses a discount rate of 10% and a study period of 5 years, this tourism project is justifiable according to cost-benefit analysis?
For the four alternatives described in the table, which project or projects should be selected, using ROR method and MARR of 13% ? (Use only capital letters for alternatives names exactly as in table. For Ai*, use number followed by % immediately (no space)) 1- if they are independents: 2- If they are mutually exclusive: fill in the steps below based on the comparison with MARR = 13% Step 1: Exclude alternative Overall Incremental Rate of Return, % ROR, % A from competition First Alternative Cost, $ B D -80.000 14 -60.000 16 12 Step 2: |(challenger) VS|| -40.000 17 11 14 17 23 D -30,000 12 35 (defender), Ai* = -----> select Step 3: ( challenger) VS (defender), Ai* = select
Samsung Electronics is considering a product expansion of their Galaxy S Series. Two alternatives for the cell phone expansion are summarized below. The company uses a MARR of 8% per year for decisions of this type, Future Worth and Co-terminated assumption is used with study period of 8 years. Which alternative should be recommended and why? Expansion A Expansion B Capital investment Annual revenue $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $760,000 $580,000 Annual expenses Salvage value Useful life $500,000 $100,000 $360,000 $150,000 6 years 8 years
Q. 1
I need the answer as soon as possible
Q4 (i) State the salient features of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (PEPA) 1997.
You have been requested to compare four mutually exclusive alternatives using the B/C method and the results are shown. Which alternative, if any, do you recommend? Alternative X Z Q Equivalent Total Cost, $ Million 20 30 50 90 Direct B/C Ratio 0.75 1.07 1.20 1.11 AB/C Ratio When Compared with Alternative 1.70 1.50 1.21 1.40 1.13 Z 1.00
Solve all this question compulsory.....
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 12% per year. The decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation based on the following methods. Design Y a. Based on PW method, Design is more economical. b. The modified B/C ratio of Design Y is The modified B/C ration of Design Z is c. The incremental B/C ratio is (Round to two decimal places) Therefore, based on the B/C ratio method, Design Investment cost Annual revenue Annual cost Useful life Salvage value (Round to two decimal places) (Round to two decimal places) d. The discounted payback period of Design Y is The discounted payback period of Design Z is Net PW is is more economical years (Round to one decimal place) years (Round to one decimal place) $140,000 $51,725 $9,672 15 years $14,700 $149,103 Design Z $275,000 $84,946 $18,059 15 years $33,000 $186,587 Therefore, based on…