The authors of a paper compared two different instruments for measuring a person's capacity for breathing out air. (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) The two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen people participated in the study, and for each person air flow was measured once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter. The Wright meter is thought to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. Use of the mini-Wright meter could be recommended as long as there is not convincing evidence that the mean reading for the mini-Wright meter is different from the mean reading for Wright meter. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that it is reasonable to consider the 17 people who participated in this study as representative of the population of interest. Data values from this paper are given in the accompanying table. Subject 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Mini Wright Meter 511 430 520 428 500 600 364 380 658 447 432 626 260 477 259 350 451 Wright Meter 494 395 516 434 476 557 413 442 650 433 417 656 267 478 178 423 420 Use the given data to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. (Use mini-wrightwright) Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) t= Find the df. (Round your answer down to the nearest whole number.) df = [ Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value= State your conclusion. We do not reject H. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. O We reject H. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. We do not reject H. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. O We reject H. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
The authors of a paper compared two different instruments for measuring a person's capacity for breathing out air. (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) The two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen people participated in the study, and for each person air flow was measured once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter. The Wright meter is thought to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. Use of the mini-Wright meter could be recommended as long as there is not convincing evidence that the mean reading for the mini-Wright meter is different from the mean reading for Wright meter. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that it is reasonable to consider the 17 people who participated in this study as representative of the population of interest. Data values from this paper are given in the accompanying table. Subject 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Mini Wright Meter 511 430 520 428 500 600 364 380 658 447 432 626 260 477 259 350 451 Wright Meter 494 395 516 434 476 557 413 442 650 433 417 656 267 478 178 423 420 Use the given data to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. (Use mini-wrightwright) Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) t= Find the df. (Round your answer down to the nearest whole number.) df = [ Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value= State your conclusion. We do not reject H. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. O We reject H. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. We do not reject H. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. O We reject H. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:The authors of a paper compared two different instruments for measuring a person's capacity for breathing out air. (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) The two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen people
participated in the study, and for each person air flow was measured once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter.
The Wright meter is thought to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. Use of the mini-Wright meter could be recommended as long as there is not convincing evidence that the mean reading for the mini-Wright meter is different from the mean
reading for Wright meter. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that it is reasonable to consider the 17 people who participated in this study as representative of the population of interest. Data values from this paper are given in the accompanying table.
Subject
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Mini Wright
Meter
511
430
520
428
500
600
364
380
658
447
432
626
260
477
259
350
451
Wright
Meter
494
395
516
434
476
557
413
442
650
433
417
656
267
478
178
423
420
Use the given data to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. (Use mini-Wrightwright")
Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
t=
Find the df. (Round your answer down to the nearest whole number.)
df =
Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
P-value =
State your conclusion.
ⒸWe do not reject H. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
O We reject H. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
O We do not reject H. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
O We reject H. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 3 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman