Suppose that the government knows the marginal cost, MC, curve of reducing pollution but is uncertain about the marginal benefit, MB, curve. With equal probability, the government faces a relatively high or a relatively low MB curve, so its expected MB curve is the same as the one in Figure 17.4. Should the government use an emissions fee or an emissions standard to maximize expected welfare? Explain. (Hint: Use an analysis similar to that employed in Figure 17.4.)

Suppose that the government knows the marginal cost, MC, curve of reducing pollution but is uncertain about the marginal benefit, MB, curve. With equal probability, the government faces a relatively high or a relatively low MB curve, so its expected MB curve is the same as the one in Figure 17.4. Should the government use an emissions fee or an emissions standard to maximize expected welfare? Explain. (Hint: Use an analysis similar to that employed in Figure 17.4.)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 11 - 2E_1 MAC_2 = 8.5 - E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = .5E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a per unit subsidy to abatement equal to $____. Answer:
QUESTION 6 Market (inverse) demand for measles vaccine is given by P= 100-20. Market (inverse) supply for measles vaccine is given by P= 10 +0.50. Here, Pis the unit price of measles vaccine and Q denotes quantity. Suppose there are positive externalities from consuming measles vaccines. Marginal external benefit is given by MEB=0.5Q. The size of deadweight loss from the market equilibrium is 0.5x( 310.5x
None
Suppose the marginal damage cost is estimated to be MD = 0.8E and the marginal abatement cost is estimated to be MAC = 90 - E. Find the following: a) The socially efficient level of emission b) How much emission could be reduced from the uncontrolled level? c) the Total Social Costs d) Draw the graphs and show your calculations.
The marginal benefit of reducing pollution and the marginal cost of reducing pollution are given by the following equations: MB = -2U2 + 18, and MC = 2U2 + 2, where U is the number of units of pollution abatement. What is the optimal number of units of pollution abatement? A) o B) 1 C) 2 D) 3 E) 4
Scenario 10-1 The demand curve for gasoline slopes downward and the supply curve for gasoline slopes upward. The production of the 1,000th gallon of gasoline entails the following: a private cost of $3.10 • a social cost of $3-55 a value to consumers of $3.70 Refer to Scenario 10-1. Suppose the equilibrium quantity of gasoline is 1,150 gallons; that is, QMARKET = 1,150. Then the equilibrium price of a gallon could be a. $3.30. b. $3.80. c. $3.00. d. $2.80.
The figure below shows the marginal benefit (demand) of polluting for two firms: Alpha and Beta. Before the introduction of a pollution tax, pollution is free, that is, MC = $0 per ton of emissions. Marginal Benefit (MB) to Firm Tax = $100 0 MB BETA MBALPHA 25 50 75 100 Emissions (tons) The government decides to impose a tax on pollution of $100 per ton of emissions. That is, the per-unit the tax is the marginal cost of polluting. Which of the follow are true? (Select all that are true.) a. As a result of the tax, the total emissions will decrease by 50 units b. The tax was intended to decrease production by 50 units for each firm. c. As a result of the tax, both firms will decrease emissions by the same amount d. After the tax is imposed, Firm Beta will emit 50 tons more pollution than Firm Alpha e. Before the tax is imposed, Firm Beta emitted more pollution than Firm Alpha f. As a result of the tax, total emissions from the two firms will be cut in half g. The amount of tax collected…
Im confused on this question.
The government wants to address the pollution associated with the production of a good by introducing a tax on negative externality. The government is unsure about the magnitude of the negative externality (social cost of pollution) and hence it is considering two options: a high tax and a low tax option. Which statement(s) is/are true? Mark all that applies. Group of answer choices The government’s tax revenue will be higher under the high tax option. The government’s tax revenue may not be higher under the high tax options. The consumption level of the good may be lower under the high tax option. Regardless of whether the high tax or the low tax option is introduced, the cost of the tax is still lower than the social cost of pollution. Both high tax and low tax options are cost-effective in achieving a given level of pollution reduction as long as the same tax applies to all polluting sources. Only the high tax option is cost-effective.
A T, C Pollution The above graph illustrates the marginal pollution cost per ton of goods that a firm produces. Assume the firm currently has no regulation and will produce at the point Qmax. Suppose a pollution tax per ton is placed on the firm (T1). What area represents the tax paid by the firm? C only A+B A+B+C
Suppose the marginal cost of pollution abatement is constant and equal to 10 percent of GDP for each 10 percent increase in pollution control Given the following data for a $10 trillion economy, answer two questions, Level of Pollution Abatement (%) 0 (no pollution control) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 (zero emissions) Marginal Benefit ($ trillions) 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.0 08 06 04 03 02 0.1 Instructions: Enter your responses based on the percentage values provided in the table a. Identify the optimal rate of pollution abatement Now suppose that the marginal costs of pollution abatement decrease to 6 percent of GDP for each 10 percent increase in pollution control because of improved pollution control technology and more efficient sources of renewable energy b. Identify the new optimal rate of pollution abatement %
Please don't copy