Suppose that the government knows the marginal cost, MC, curve of reducing pollution but is uncertain about the marginal benefit, MB, curve. With equal probability, the government faces a relatively high or a relatively low MB curve, so its expected MB curve is the same as the one in Figure 17.4. Should the government use an emissions fee or an emissions standard to maximize expected welfare? Explain. (Hint: Use an analysis similar to that employed in Figure 17.4.)

Suppose that the government knows the marginal cost, MC, curve of reducing pollution but is uncertain about the marginal benefit, MB, curve. With equal probability, the government faces a relatively high or a relatively low MB curve, so its expected MB curve is the same as the one in Figure 17.4. Should the government use an emissions fee or an emissions standard to maximize expected welfare? Explain. (Hint: Use an analysis similar to that employed in Figure 17.4.)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Provide a reason why the marginal damages from some emissions may be increasing with the level of emissions (like in the figure above). Suppose the unregulated level of emissions is E3. What area(s) represent the total damages from unregulated emissions? Suppose emissions levels drop from E3 to E1. What area(s) represent the total benefits from the emissions reduction from E3 to E1? What point denotes the marginal damage from emissions at E2?
Parks confer many external benefits on society: open space, trees that reduce pollution, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of parks is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for parks (their private value), the supply of parks (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of parks, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.
An externality, which is sometimes also called a (Spillover OR Social cost) , can have a negative or a positive impact on the third party. An externality occurs when an exchange between a (Buyer and seller OR Population of two cities) has an impact on a third party who (Is not OR is) part of the exchange. For a negative externality, the private costs of an action are (Less or More) than the costs imposed on society as a whole. For a positive externality, the private benefits of an action are (Less or More) than the social benefits. An example of positive externality is (Vccination OR Good wether), whereas an example of negative externality is (Population OR Hurricane)
Externalities: Suppose the daily inverse demand curve for gasoline in Portland is given by P = $100 – Q, the MC = 1.5Q, and the EMC = 1.5Q. Q is measured in thousands of gallons of gasoline per day. a. Graph the demand, marginal cost, and external marginal cost functions. b. How many gallons will be consumed per day if gasoline consumers do not consider the EMC of gasoline? c. How many gallons of gasoline will be consumed per day if gasoline consumers consider the EMC.
No hand written solution Afirm has an industrial plant that emits pollutants into a town’s lake. The plant’s marginal abatement function is MAC= 200 – 0.5E and damages caused by its emissions are given by MD = 2E where emissions are in kg. per day. What is the socially efficient level of emissions from this plant? Illustrate this in a graph. As an incentive to reduce emissions to the socially efficient level, government offers to pay the firm for each kg. of emissions it abates per day from this plant. What subsidy per kg. should the government offer? If the plant abates to the socially efficient level of emissions, what total subsidy payment would the firm receive? Identify the area in your graph. How much better or worse off would the firm be compared to if it did no abating? Identify the area in your graph. What would be the net benefit to society if we pay the firm to reduce the plant’s emissions to the socially efficient level? Identify this area in your graph.
Define public goods
Apolluting firm dumps waste into the ocean during production. The loss in value due to damaging the fish stack is valued at $100,000 (you can think of this as lost profits for fishing firms). The firm could eliminate the pollution at a cost of $60,000 a year. Choose the statement that describes the expected efficient outcome if the polluting firm has property rights over the ocean. The firm continues to pollute The polluting firm pays the $60,000 to eliminate pollution The fishing firms pay the $60,000 to eliminate pollution The polluting firm and fishing firms share the $60,000 cost of eliminating pollution
A steel plant causes about 100 tons of pollution to be released for every 100 tons of steel. Every ton of pollution causes $4 worth of damage to the local town. The MC(Q)=27Q, What is the SMC(Q) for steel? O SMC(Q)=27Q+ 4Q O SMC(Q)=27Q+ 400 O SMC(Q)=27Q+ 4 O SMC(Q)=27Q+ 400Q
MAC_1 = 11 - 2E 1 MAC 2 = 8.5 E_2, and assume marginal external damages ( MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg E_1 + E_2) is: MED = .5 E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a per- unit tax on emissions. With this tax, the total amount of tax revenue raised is $ =
A firm’s own MAC function = -29Q + 298. Suppose the emission tax is $95/ton/month. a. Draw the firms’ MAC curve and find the efficient level of emissions for the firm. b. Then what would be the total tax bill and total abatement cost at the efficient level of emissions? As a result, what would be the total cost for the firm? c.Explain why the firm would not reduce its emissions to 1 ton/month. Please explain each carefully.
In the case of the ozone regulation, economic analysis suggest that the total benefits (damages avoided) are smaller than the total abatement costs. Draw a graph that depicts this possibility.
Suppose an unvaccinated man Tom would get $10 of private benefit out of a flu shot. The flu shot costs $20 at the local clinic. The herd immunity benefit of the shot is worth an additional $15 to Tom's friends and co-workers. (1) What is the private cost incurred when Tom gets the shot? (2) Is it privately efficient for Tom to get the shot? (3) What is the public or social cost incurred when Tom gets the shot? (4) What is the public or social benefit when Tom gets the shot? (5) Is it publicly/socially efficient for Tom to get the shot? Hint: please consider only the information provided in the question. Any other potential cost or benefit can be ignored. Please explain your answers. Do not simply provide a Yes or No as the answer. If it involves calculations, show your steps.