To evaluate potential policy options that address emissions and climate change, economists often recommend a thorough cost-benefit analysis, in which the avoided environmental and human health damages are weighed against the["marginal abatement costs", "marginal abatement benefits"] . Most estimates by environmental economists suggest that the benefits of emission reduction are somewhere between 5-20% of world GDP, while the costs are between 1-4%. Using a cost-benefit analysis, this would imply that these policies ["should", "should not"] be implemented. The resulting policies can take the form of ["preventive", "adaptive"] strategies, those that reduce damages resulting from climate change, or ["preventive", "adaptive"] strategies that reduce emissions.
To evaluate potential policy options that address emissions and climate change, economists often recommend a thorough cost-benefit analysis, in which the avoided environmental and human health damages are weighed against the["marginal abatement costs", "marginal abatement benefits"] .
Most estimates by environmental economists suggest that the benefits of emission reduction are somewhere between 5-20% of world
The resulting policies can take the form of ["preventive", "adaptive"] strategies, those that reduce damages resulting from climate change, or ["preventive", "adaptive"] strategies that reduce emissions.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images
