Suppose that the government knows the marginal cost, MC, curve of reducing pollution but is uncertain about the marginal benefit, MB, curve. With equal probability, the government faces a relatively high or a relatively low MB curve, so its expected MB curve is the same as the one in Figure 17.4. Should the government use an emissions fee or an emissions standard to maximize expected welfare? Explain. (Hint: Use an analysis similar to that employed in Figure 17.4.)

Suppose that the government knows the marginal cost, MC, curve of reducing pollution but is uncertain about the marginal benefit, MB, curve. With equal probability, the government faces a relatively high or a relatively low MB curve, so its expected MB curve is the same as the one in Figure 17.4. Should the government use an emissions fee or an emissions standard to maximize expected welfare? Explain. (Hint: Use an analysis similar to that employed in Figure 17.4.)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 11 - 2E_1 MAC_2 = 8.5 - E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = .5E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a per unit subsidy to abatement equal to $____. Answer:
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 24 - 2E_1 MAC_2 = 20 - E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = 2E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a cap and trade policy and sets the cap equal to the socially efficient level of emissions (E*_Agg). If firm 2 is initially grandfathered 5 permits, it will buy more permits. (Note: your answer can be positive or negative; if it is positive, the firm is buying additional permits; if it is negative, the firm sells permits. So, for example, an answer of -10 implies that the firm sells 10 permits)
The marginal benefit of reducing pollution and the marginal cost of reducing pollution are given by the following equations: MB = -2U2 + 18, and MC = 2U2 + 2, where U is the number of units of pollution abatement. What is the optimal number of units of pollution abatement? A) o B) 1 C) 2 D) 3 E) 4
Scenario 10-1 The demand curve for gasoline slopes downward and the supply curve for gasoline slopes upward. The production of the 1,000th gallon of gasoline entails the following: a private cost of $3.10 • a social cost of $3-55 a value to consumers of $3.70 Refer to Scenario 10-1. Suppose the equilibrium quantity of gasoline is 1,150 gallons; that is, QMARKET = 1,150. Then the equilibrium price of a gallon could be a. $3.30. b. $3.80. c. $3.00. d. $2.80.
ns g Table 3 Types Hardcover Price Paperback $9.99 Q $27.95 0.5 millions $1.50 AC Option 1: profit- $12.74 O Option 2: profit- $22.74 Option 3: profit $23.74 Option 3: profit- $21.72 O Option 2 profit-$12.735 O Option 1 profit -$13.225 1 millions $1.50 Given the information, the publisher has the following three pricing options: Option 1: Only sell the hardcover at $27.95 Option 2: Only sell the paperback at $9.99 Option 3: Sell hardcover at a price of $27.95 and paperback at a price of $9.99. Given the options, estimated quantities sold at each price and average cost, which price option would generate the most profit and how much is the profit? Search
Im confused on this question.
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC 1 10 - .5E_1 = MAC 2 20 E_2, = - and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = .5E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a cap and trade policy and sets the permit cap equal to F
A T, C Pollution The above graph illustrates the marginal pollution cost per ton of goods that a firm produces. Assume the firm currently has no regulation and will produce at the point Qmax. Suppose a pollution tax per ton is placed on the firm (T1). What area represents the tax paid by the firm? C only A+B A+B+C
Which of the following statements about pollution taxes, cap and trade, or command-and-control standards is FALSE? a.) Pollution taxes strictly control the amount of pollution but leave marginal abatement costs to be determined by the market. Cap-and-trade programs strictly control marginal abatement costs but leave the actual amount of pollution to be determined by the overall level of economic activity. b.) Pollution taxes are unpopular in the U.S. because American companies tend to dislike taxes in general. However, pollution taxes offer firms some greater certainty about how large will be their marginal cost of abatement on the last unit of abatement they will need to do, if they are to minimize the costs they incur both for cleanup and for pollution taxes. c.) Both command-and-control pollution standards, and cap-and-trade programs, can effectively limit the total amount of pollution, but command and control will be least-cost only by accident. Usually,…
Example: Question 4a.) Arthur’s demand to reduce electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) is P = 20 – 2 Q, whileRonald’s demand is P = 15 – 3 Q. If the marginal cost of reducing emissions is equal to$15 and is constant, what is the optimal amount of EMF reduction? b.) What Lindahl prices would you charge Arthur and Ronald? What might prevent you fromcollecting these prices?c.) How would your answers change if the marginal cost of reducing emissions was equal to$10 and is constant?d.) What are the consumer surpluses of Arthur and Ronald in c.)?
3Q6Q7Q8: all questions have a correlation towards each other. Use the following to complete them.
Provide a reason why the marginal damages from some emissions may be increasing with the level of emissions (like in the figure above). Suppose the unregulated level of emissions is E3. What area(s) represent the total damages from unregulated emissions? Suppose emissions levels drop from E3 to E1. What area(s) represent the total benefits from the emissions reduction from E3 to E1? What point denotes the marginal damage from emissions at E2?