1. Specialization and production possibilitiesSuppose Poland produces only tablets and smartphones. The resources that are used in the production of these two goods are not specialized-that is,the same set of resources is equally useful in producing both smartphones and tablets.The shape of Poland's production possibilities frontier (PPF) should reflect the fact that as Poland produces more smartphones and fewer tablets, theopportunity cost of producing each additional smartphoneThe following graphs show two possible PPFS for Poland's economy: a straight line PPF (PPF1) and a bowed-out PPF (PPF2).TABLETSPPF₁Graph 1SMARTPHONES?TABLETSPPF2Graph 2SMARTPHONES(?) The shape of Poland's production possibilities frontier (PPF) should reflect the fact that as Poland produces more smartphones and fewer tablets, theopportunity cost of producing each additional smartphoneThe following graphs show two possible PPFS for Poland's economy: a straight-line PPF (PPF1) and a bowed-out PPF (PPF2).TABLETSPPF₁Graph 1SMARTPHONES?TABLETSPPF₂Graph 2SMARTPHONES(?)Based on the previous description, the trade-off Poland faces between producing smartphones and tablets is best represented by

Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) illustrates the combination of two goods that a nation can…

Suppose Poland produces only tablets and smartphones. The resources that are used in the production of these two goods are not specialized-that is, the same set of resources is equally useful in producing both smartphones and tablets. The shape of Poland's production possibilities frontier (PPF) should reflect the fact that as Poland produces more smartphones and fewer tablets, the opportunity cost of producing each additional smartphone The following graphs show two possible PPFS for Poland's economy: a straightyline PPF (PPF1) and a bowed-out PPF (PPF2).

Suppose Poland produces only tablets and smartphones. The resources that are used in the production of these two goods are not specialized-that is, the same set of resources is equally useful in producing both smartphones and tablets. The shape of Poland's production possibilities frontier (PPF) should reflect the fact that as Poland produces more smartphones and fewer tablets, the opportunity cost of producing each additional smartphone The following graphs show two possible PPFS for Poland's economy: a straightyline PPF (PPF1) and a bowed-out PPF (PPF2).

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Can I have help finding the solution?
Question 3 The U.S. economy's Production Possibilities Frontier is made up of two goods: oranges and automobiles. The U.S. economy moves from point A, where it produces 100 oranges and 200 cars, to point B, where it produces 200 oranges and 150 cars. It follows that Point A is an inefficient point. Point B may be an inefficient point There is not enough information to answer the question Point B is an inefficient point Question 5 Which of the following statements are false? 1. If scarcity did not exist, then neither would the Production Possibilities Frontier. II. All Production Possibilities Frontiers are bowed out from the origin. III. All Production Possibilities Frontiers are made up of two goods or services. IV. Opportunity cost can not be illustrated with the Production Possibility Frontier. OL True statement. III. IV II and IV Question 16 Which of the following will have no impact on the demand for Yogurtland frozen yogurt in San Diego? A change in the price of frozen yogurt…
Suppose the economy initially produces 15,000 gallons of drinking water and 450,000 tons of steel, which is represented by point A. The opportunity cost of producing an additional 5,000 gallons of drinking water (that is, moving production to point B) is (72,000, 135,000, 90,000, 54,000, 108,000) tons of steelSuppose, instead, that the economy currently produces 378,000 tons of steel and 20,000 gallons of drinking water, which is represented by point B. Now the opportunity cost of producing an additional 5,000 gallons of drinking water (that is, moving to point C) is (72,000, 135,000, 90,000, 54,000, 108,000) ons of steel.Comparing your answers in the two previous paragraphs, you can see that the opportunity cost of 5,000 additional gallons of drinking water at point B is (Less, Equal, Or Greater Than) the opportunity cost of 5,000 additional gallons of drinking water at point A. This reflects the (Notion that Countries can gain from trade, Law of Increasing Opportunity Costs, Fact…
c. Suppose a small country produces only food and clothing. An earthquake destroys many of the clothing factories, but the ability to produce food is unaffected. Use the 3-point-curve drawing tool to draw a new production possibilities boundary on the graph on the right, labeled c, reflecting the change in the clothing factories. Properly label this line. Place end points one on horizontal and one on vertical axes. Carefully follow the instructions above, and only draw the required objects. Tonnes of Clothing Per Year PPBO Tonnes of Food Per Year
The figure above shows a country's production possibility frontier (PPFA). В PPFA PPFB The country's PPF shifts from PPFA to PPFB, and moves from Point 'A' to Point 'B'. Which event could explain this move? O The country acquired new technology in its major industries. O The country is recovering from a recession. The country decreases its capital-to-labor ratio. O The country utilizes its excess labor. Match each letter to the input it represents. Choose ] Human capital Labor Natural capital L Animals Natural resources and labor Labor and land Land and natural resources H Physical Capital Entrepreneurship/ Automation K Choose ] A Choose ] Use the lecture video and slides to fill in the blanks.The catch-up effect is why poor countries grow faster than rich ones. This is because developing countries to make their inputs more productive; whereas developed countries must to increase growth.
. Country A and Country B are two countries that each produce t-shirts (T) and sneakers (S). From its available resources and technology Country A can produce 100 t-shirts and 0 sneakers or 0 t- shirts and 200 sneakers or any combination of t-shirts and sneakers that sits on Country A's linear PPF. From its available resources and technology Country B can produce 50 t-shirts and 0 sneaker or 0 t-shirt and 50 sneakers or any combination of t-shirts and sneakers that sits on Country B's linear PPF. a. On two separate graphs draw the PPF for Country A and Country B. Measure t-shirts on the vertical axis and sneakers on the horizontal axis.
Draw two Linear Production Possibilities Curves for two countries: Portugal and England and two products :Wine (kegs) and Cloth (Sheets). On Portugal's graph show the maximum production per worker of cloth sheets of 100 units on the Y axis. On the X axis show the maximum production of Wine at 150 kegs. For England's graph show the outputs at 90 cloth sheets on the Y axis and 60 Wine kegs on the X axis
Consider the production possibilities frontier below. Assume that an economy is producing the mix of outputs represented by point A. What would have to happen in order for this economy to produce at point B? Output 2 Technological progress A recession Output 1 Giving up some output 1 to produce more output 2 A decrease in taxes
Refer to the accompanying figure. If this economy were currently operating at point D, then in order to make more movies: A Movies (number per year) B D Milk (gallons per year) the first productive resources to switch to making movies should be those with the lowest opportunity cost of making milk. no productive resources would need to switch from making milk to movies because each resource should continue to be used according to its comparative advantage. no productive resources would need to switch from making milk to movies because point D is already efficient. the first productive resources to switch to making movies should be those with the highest opportunity cost of making milk.
Line XX is the production possibility curve (PPC) of a worker picking peas and beans in a 10 hour working day. (The graph for this question is attached below) What would cause the worker's PPC to shift to the line YY? A. a machine that increases the worker's pea picking productivity only B. a new work schedule where the worker spends 6 hours per day picking peas and only 4 hours picking beans C. a reduction in working hours to 8 per day and a machine that increases the worker's pea picking productivity D a reduction in working hours to 8 per day only
The slope of the production possibilities frontier is called
PPF 16 14 Without Trade 12 With Trade 6. 4 0. 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Wheat (millions of bushels) Now suppose that the United States offers to sell 10 million cars to Mexico in exchange for 150 million bushels of wheat. On the previous graph, use the grey point (star symbol) to indicate the consumption bundle Mexico can achieve with trade if it continues to consume 200 million bushels of wheat. Мexico accept the deal the United States proposes. Cars (millions) 10