Answered: opportunity costs in Portugal of…

Business

Economics

opportunity costs in Portugal of producing a bushel of wool

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Give a specific example of what would cause the PPF to shift outward. Give a specific example of what would cause an economy to move from a point inside the PPF to a point on the PPF.
A country produces two goods: coconuts and umbrellas. Their production possibilities frontier (PPF) places coconuts on the x-axis and umbrellas on the y-axis. How would a drought that makes it difficult to grow coconuts but does not affect the production of umbrellas change the PPF? Neither the value of the x-intercept nor the y-intercept would change The value of the y-intercept would increase but the value of the x-intercept would not change The value of the x-intercept would increase but the value of the y-intercept would not change Both the value of the x-intercept and the y-intercept would increase The value of the y-intercept would decrease but the value of the x-intercept would not change The value of the x-intercept would decrease but the value of the y-intercept would not change
This table gives how long it takes two roommates to perform two household tasks: Dust the furniture Do the laundry Olivia 3 hours 1 hour Emma 4 hours 2 hours has a comparative advantage at doing the laundry and has a comparative advantage at dusting the furniture. A) Emma; Olivia B) Olivia; Olivia C) Emma; Emma D) Olivia; Emma
Derive the production possibilities frontier (PPF) for Home and Foreign and plot it in a graph with good x in the horizontal axis and good y in the vertical axis.
The Table below shows the amount of labor hours needed to produce cars and airplanes by Japan and Korea. Assume that each country has 2400 hours of labor available. If we were to draw the PPF for Japan and Korea putting cars in the horizontal axis, then: Table Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Car 30 50 Airplane 150 150 Japan Korea O the slope of Japan's PPF would be -5 and the slope of Korea's PPF would be -3 the slope of Japan's PPF would be -0.2 and the slope of Korea's PPF would be -0.33 the slope of Japan's PPF would be -0.25 and the slope of Korea's PPF would be -0.33. O the slope of Japan's PPF would be -5 and the slope of Korea's PPF would be -0.33.
0:25:00 13 of Lauren and Andrew can produce cherries or papayas. If they spent their day on producing either of the two goods, Lauren can produce up to 30 cherries or 10 papayas and Andrew can produce up to 50 cherries or 10 papayas. Lauren's opportunity cost of producing 1 papaya is Andrew's opportunity cost of producing 1 papaya is Lauren has the comparative advantage in advantage in → papaya. ◆ cherries. ◆ cherries. and Andrew has the comparative Lauren and Andrew can gain from trading if the price falls between → cherries for 1 Lauren and Andrew can produce cherries or papayas. If they spent their day on producing either ond Androw can produce
LENTILS (Millions of pounds) 80 70 8 60 50 40 30 20 10 + 0 0 PPF 10 Shenandoah 20 30 40 50 60 PEAS (Millions of pounds) 70 80 (?) LENTILS (Millions of pounds) 80 70 60 50 40 30 PPF 20 10 0 0 T 10 Denali 40 20 30 50 60 PEAS (Millions of pounds) 70 80 (?) Shenandoah has a comparative advantage in the production of , while Denali has a comparative advantage in the production of . Suppose that Shenandoah and Denali specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of peas. million pounds of lentils and million pounds of Suppose that Shenandoah and Denali agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. The countries decide to exchange 20 million pounds of peas for 20 million pounds of lentils. This ratio of goods is known as the price of trade between Shenandoah and Denali. The following graph shows the same PPF for Shenandoah…
I've already read the answer provided on this site, but it is not giving me the information I need. I understand the math for finding the opportunity costs for each item in each country. However, where are they getting the answer that 2.5 tons of chemicals is what the US will give up, and 1 ton of apparel is what China will give up? From videos I've seen on youtube, they basically state that as long as the cost is less than what the original opportunity cost is, then nations will trade. So, it costs China 4 apparel for every 1 ton of chemicals, and in the US it costs 1 apparel for every 3 tons of chemicals. Am I right to assume that as long as China can trade less than 4 apparel it will benefit, and as long as the US can trade less than 3 tons of chemicals it will benefit? If so, then what is the math being used to arrive at exactly 1 ton of Chemicals for 1 ton of Apparel for China, and 1 apparel for 2.5 tons of Chemicals for the US? I need to understand the math that is used to…
There are two countries, Atlantis and Thule, and two goods, Clothing (C) and food (F) In Atlantis, it takes 3 units of labour to produce a unit of Clothing and 3 units of labour to make a unit of Food. In Thule, a unit of Clothing requires 2 units of labour, and a unit of Food requires 5 units of labour. Assume that Atlantis has 300 units of labour, and Thule has 500 units of labour. (a) What is the opportunity cost of Food in terms of Clothing in each country? (b) Which country has an absolute advantage in which good? (c) Which country has a comparative advantage in which good? Why? (d) Draw the production possibilities frontier for each country (put Food on the horizontal axis). Label axes and slopes. (e) Draw the world production possibilities frontier (assuming labour does not move between countries). Again, put Food on the horizontal axis. Label axes and important points on - 2 - the diagram. (f ) Draw the world relative supply curve (labelled RS) for F/C with the relative price…
Sam can brew 5 gallons of root beer in an hour or he can make 4 pizzas in an hour. Ben can brew 7 gallons of root beer in an hour or he can make 5 pizzas in an hour. Who has an absolute advantage in making pizza? [ Select ] ["Ben", "Sam"] Who has a comparative advantage in making pizza? [ Select ] ["Sam", "Ben"]
Give a definition of an advance in technology. Suppose that you are drawing a PPF for civilian goods and military goods, describe the effect on the PPF of an advance in technology in both civilian goods and military goods. How would the impact on the PPF be different if the technological improvement only helped in the production of military goods, but not civilian goods?
Consider a simple exchange economy with two people: Bob and Jake. Bob and Jake both have 10 hours of time available. They can use their time to do one of 2 things: make pancakes or make hamburgers. Bob can make 2 hamburgers in an hour or 1 pancake in an hour. Jake can make 3 pancakes in an hour and 2 hamburgers in an hour. Use this information to answer the following question: Who has absolute advantage in the production of hamburgers and who has absolute advantage in the production of pancakes?