Suppose initially that the United States is consuming 4 boots and 8 shirts and Canada is consuming 18 boots and 2 shirts, as indicated in the figure. Then, suppose the United States and Canada specialize by each only producing the good for which they have a comparative advantage and then trade. In particular, suppose the United States trades Canada half of its production for half of what Canada produces. The United States will have additional shirt(s) after the trade (enter a numeric response using an integer) and additional boot(s). At the same time, Canada will be able to consume additional shirt(s) as a result of the trade and additional boot(s).

Suppose initially that the United States is consuming 4 boots and 8 shirts and Canada is consuming 18 boots and 2 shirts, as indicated in the figure. Then, suppose the United States and Canada specialize by each only producing the good for which they have a comparative advantage and then trade. In particular, suppose the United States trades Canada half of its production for half of what Canada produces. The United States will have additional shirt(s) after the trade (enter a numeric response using an integer) and additional boot(s). At the same time, Canada will be able to consume additional shirt(s) as a result of the trade and additional boot(s).

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Assume the situation of an exchange economy. (a) Determine the contract curve as an expression in which good I (x₁) is a function of good 2 (x2).(b) Provide a diagram that illustrates the contract curve and the core of the economy.(c) Determine the Walrasian equilibrium prices.
When a country speciallizes in the production of a good, this means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than Its trading partner. Because of this comparative advantage, both countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other. The following graphs show the production possibilitles frontlers (PPFS) for Maldonia and Sylvanla. Both countries produce lemons and coffee, each Initlally (that is, before specialization and trade) producing 18 million pounds of lemons and 9 million pounds of coffee, as Indicated by grey points (star symbols) labeled point A. Maldonia Sylvania 48 48 42 42 36 36 PPF 30 30 24 24 18 PPF 18 12 12 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 LEMONS (Milions of pounds) LEMONS (Millions of pounds) Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of while Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the . If each fully specializes (that is, produces only the good for which each has a comparative production of advantage), the most the…
Consider a simple exchange economy with two people: Bob and Jake. Bob and Jake both have 10 hours of time available. They can use their time to do one of 2 things: make pancakes or make hamburgers. Bob can make 2 hamburgers in an hour or 1 pancake in an hour. Jake can make 3 pancakes in an hour and 2 hamburgers in an hour. Use this information to answer the following question: Who has absolute advantage in the production of hamburgers and who has absolute advantage in the production of pancakes?
Suppose initially that the United States is consuming 2 boots and 18 shirts and Canada is consuming 12 boots and 2 shirts, as indicated in the figure. Then, suppose the United States and Canada specialize by each only producing the good for which they have a comparative advantage and then trade. In particular, suppose the United States trades Canada half of its production for half of what Canada produces. The United States will have ? additional shirt(s) after the trade (enter a numeric response using an integer)
Suppose the United States and Mexico both produce hamburgers and tacos. The combinations of the two goods that each country can produce in one day are presented in the table below. United States Mexico Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) 162 135 90 108 18 90 180 54 36 45 270 54 Which country has an absolute advantage in producing tacos? The United States Which country has a comparative advantage in producing tacos? Mexico Suppose the United States is currently producing 180 tons of hamburgers and 54 tons of tacos and Mexico is currently producing 36 tons of hamburgers and 45 tons of tacos. If the United States and Mexico each specialize in producing only one good (the good for which each has a comparative advantage), then a total of additional ton(s) of hamburgers can be produced for the two countries combined (enter a numeric response using an integer)
When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Yosemite and Rainier. Both countries produce com and lentils, each Initially (l.e., before specialization and trade) producing 30 million pounds of corn and 15 million pounds of lentils, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. LENTILS (Milions of pounds) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 80 70 60 80 50 70 Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. 40 60 30 50 20 40 10 30 PPF 0 20 10 0 0 0 Yosemite has a comparative advantage in the production of while Rainler has a comparative advantage in the production of . Suppose that Yosemite and Rainier specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage.…
If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 100 units of good X. If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 150 units of good Y. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 75 units of good X. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 125 units of good Y. Both countries have (linear) straight line PPFs. What is the opportunity cost of producing 10 units of X in country A? (hint: your answer should be measured in the positive number of units of good Y that must be given up - round your answer to two decimal places only if necessary)
Suppose that Canada imports pearl necklaces from India. The free market price is $111.00 per necklace. If the tariff on imports in Canada is initially 26%, Canadians pay $ per necklace. One of the accomplishments of the Uruguay Round that took place between 1986 and 1993 was significant across-the-board tariff cuts for industrial countries, as well as many developing countries. Suppose that as a result of the Uruguay Round, Canada reduces its import tariffs to 13%. Assuming the price of pearl necklaces is still $111.00 per necklace, consumers now pay the price of $ Based on the calculations and the scenarios presented, the Uruguay Round most likely hurts consumers hurts consumers in India. per necklace. in Canada and
When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFs) for Glacier and Rainier. Both countries produce corn and basil, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 18 million pounds of corn and 9 million pounds of basil, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. BASIL (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 0 PPF 6 Glacier A 12 18 24 30 36 CORN (Millions of pounds) 42 48 ? BASIL (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 0 PPF I + 6 Rainier 12 18 24 30 36 CORN (Millions of pounds) I 42 48 (?) Glacier has a comparative advantage in the production of while Rainier has a comparative advantage in the production of Suppose that Glacier and Rainier specialize in the production…
The U.S. and Canada both produce aircraft engines and tons of chemicals, which are sold for the same price in both countries. Suppose that with one unit of labor and one unit of capital, the U.S. can produce either 20 engines or 38 tons of chemicals and Canada can produce either 15 engines or 35 tons of chemicals. Which country has an absolute advantage producing chemicals?
When a country specializes in the production of a good, this means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Because of this comparative advantage, both countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Maldonia and Lamponia. Both countries produce lemons and sugar, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of lemons and 12 million pounds of sugar, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. (? (?) Maldonia Lamponia 64 64 56 56 48 PPF 48 40 40 32 32 24 24 PPF 16 16 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) LEMONS (Millions of pounds) Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of production of while Lamponia has a comparative advantage in the . Suppose that Maldonia and Lamponia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage.…
When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Maldonia and Desonia. Both countries produce lemons and tea, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of lemons and 12 million pounds of tea, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. (2 Maldonia Desonia 64 64 56 56 48 PPF 48 40 40 32 32 24 24 PPF 16 16 8 8 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) LEMONS (Millions of pounds) TEA (Millions of pounds) TEA (Millions of pounds)