Suppose that Maldonia and Desonia agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of grain. The countries decide to exchange 4 million pounds of grain for 4 million pounds of tea. This ratio of goods is known as the terms of trade between Maldonia and Desonia. The following graph shows the PPF for Maldonia, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (cross symbol) on the graph to indicate Maldonia's consumption after trade. Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. TEA (Milons of pounds) 9 H 2 R 0 PPF 2 4 Maldonia 6 B 10 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) After trade, Maldonia consumes 12 14 10 million pounds of grain as well as Consumption After Trade million pounds of tea.

Suppose that Maldonia and Desonia agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of grain. The countries decide to exchange 4 million pounds of grain for 4 million pounds of tea. This ratio of goods is known as the terms of trade between Maldonia and Desonia. The following graph shows the PPF for Maldonia, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (cross symbol) on the graph to indicate Maldonia's consumption after trade. Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. TEA (Milons of pounds) 9 H 2 R 0 PPF 2 4 Maldonia 6 B 10 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) After trade, Maldonia consumes 12 14 10 million pounds of grain as well as Consumption After Trade million pounds of tea.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In Country T, it takes 10 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 13.5 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. In Country Y, it takes 40 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 20 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. Country T has a comparative advantage over Country Y in cocoa. This follows the theory of comparative advantage, and we can say that engaging in free trade benefits all countries that participate in it; however, this conclusion stems from which of these inaccurate assumptions? Multiple Choice We have assumed constant returns to scale. We have assumed the prices of resources and exchange rates in the two countries are dynamic. We have assumed there are barriers to the movement of resources from the production of one good to another within the same country. We have assumed that agrarian nations do not specialize in producing particular products. We have assumed diminishing returns to specialization.
A country may specialize in the production of a good that it can produce at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. Because of this comparative advantage, countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other. The following graphs show the production possibilities curves (PPCs) for Freedonia and Sylvania. Both countries produce grain and tea, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of grain and 12 million pounds of tea, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. Freedonia has a comparative advantage in the production of , while Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the production of . Suppose that Freedonia and Sylvania specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of million pounds of tea and million pounds of grain. Suppose that Freedonia and Sylvania agree to trade. Each country focuses its…
Country X does not allow imports of clothing. In its equilibrium without trade, a sweater costs $20 and the equilibrium quantity is 3 million sweaters. One day, the president decides to open the market to international trade. The market price of a sweater falls to the world price of $16. The number of sweaters consumed in Country X rises to 4 million, while the number of sweaters produced declines to 1 million. a) illustrate in a graph the situation just described. Your graph should show all the numbers. b) Calculate the change in consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus that results from opening up trade.
Suppose that Canada can produce 100,000 hockey sticks or 10,000 gallons of maple syrup in a typical workweek, while Germany can produce 90,000 hockey sticks or 10,000 gallons of maple syrup in a typical workweek. From these numbers, we can conclude: Question 48 options: Canada has a comparative advantage in the production of hockey sticks. Germany has a comparative advantage in the production of hockey sticks. Canada has an absolute advantage in the production of maple syrup. Germany has an absolute advantage in the production of maple syrup.
When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFs) for Freedonia and Lamponia. Both countries produce potatoes and tea, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 6 million pounds of potatoes and 3 million pounds of tea, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. Suppose that Freedonia and Lamponia agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. The countries decide to exchange 2 million pounds of potatoes for 2 million pounds of tea. This ratio of goods is known as the price of trade between Freedonia and Lamponia. The following graph shows the same PPF for Freedonia as before, as well as its…
Taylor and Bobby are auto mechanics. Taylor takes 12 hours to replace an engine and 4 hours to replace a set of brakes. Bobby takes 8 hours to replace an engine and 4 hours to replace a set of brakes. State whether anyone has an absolute advantage at either task and, for each task, identify who has a comparative advantage.
Which of the following is true based on the graph below? * Refer to the graph below to answer questions 1-6 below. Quantity of wheat (bushels) 200 Country A's PPC 100 Country B's PPC 100 150 Quantity of textiles (units) Country A has a constant opportunity cost of making textiles Country B has an increasing opportunity cost of making bushel. Country B has absolute advantage in wheat; Country A has absolute advantage in textiles. Country B has absolute advantage in both wheat and textiles. Country A has absolute advantage in wheat; neither country has absolute advantage in textiles.
Suppose that Maldonia and Lamponia agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. The countries decide to exchange 16 million pounds of lemons for 16 million pounds of sugar. This ratio of goods is known as the terms of trade between Maldonia and Lamponia. The following graph shows the same PPF for Maldonia as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (+ symbol) on the graph to indicate Maldonia's consumption after trade. Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. Maldonia 64 56 Consumption After Trade 48 PPF 40 32 24 16 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) The following graph shows the same PPF for Lamponia as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. SUGAR (Millions of pounds)
Suppose a country is currently producing at a point on its production possibility frontier, and undertakes no trade with other countries. Then trade is opened up. Which of the following would not occur as a direct result?a) Its production possibility frontier would shift.b) Its production would shift to another point on its production possibility frontier.c) The pattern of products that the country produced would differ from the pattern that its consumers consumed.d) Consumers would be able to consume at a point outside the production possibility frontier. Please dont use any ai tool.
Suppose the United States and Mexico both produce hamburgers and tacos. The combinations of the two goods that each country can produce in one day are presented in the table below. Part 2 United States Mexico Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) 0 270 0 150 100 180 20 100 200 90 40 50 300 0 60 0 Part 3 Which country has an absolute advantage in producing tacos? The United States Mexico . Part 4 Which country has a comparative advantage in producing tacos? The United States Mexico . Part 5 Suppose the United States is currently producing 200 tons of hamburgers and 90 tons of tacos and Mexico is currently producing 40 tons of hamburgers and 50 tons of tacos. If the United States and Mexico each specialize in producing only one good (the good for which each has a comparative advantage), then a total of enter your response here ___additional ton(s) of hamburgers…
Maldonia and lamponias consumption after trade on the graph!
In a PPC graph, if free trade makes the budget line become flatter and the comparative advantage good is on the y - axis, what has free trade done to the country's terms of trade?