suggest 1. species concepts that are consistent with the view that the yellow-legged gull L. michahellis represent a separate species; and (note: researchers use multiple lines of evidence to support a conclusion.) 2. a species concept that does NOT support that view (i.e., that supports the historical one- species classification). For each species concept, explain your reasoning in 1 or 2 sentences. Figures of the two bird species are posted in a sperate file on eClass.

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...
icon
Related questions
Question
The yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) is a widespread species along the Atlantic coasts of
France and the Iberian Peninsula, the Azores Islands, Madeira, the countries of the Mediterranean
basin and the Black Sea. It was formerly considered as a subspecies of Herring Gull (L.
argentatus), with which it coexists in some reproductive areas.
Only recently L. michahellis has been recognized as a distinct species. Following detailed
comparison of the two species, researchers found that the L. michahellis's restricted but dense
head-streaking and advanced primary molt in late summer, are not compatible with L. argentatus.
Larus michahellis has a proportionately longer, heavier bill and bulkier head and body than L.
urgentutus. In addition, L. michahellis's yellow bill has a red gonydeal spot, both colors typically
brighter than in L. urgentutus outside breeding season. They also have an orange-red to
vermilion orbital ring and yellow legs.
DNA research, however, suggests that the yellow-legged gull L. michahellis is actually closest to
the great black-backed gull L. marinus and the Armenian gull L. armenicus comparing with L.
urgentutus. Therefore, researchers concluded that these similar-looking yellow-legged gull
should be recognized as a separate species. Based only on the evidence described above,
suggest
1. species concepts that are consistent with the view that the yellow-legged gull L. michahellis
represent a separate species; and (note: researchers use multiple lines of evidence to
support a conclusion.)
2. a species concept that does NOT support that view (i.e., that supports the historical one-
species classification). For each species concept, explain your reasoning in 1 or 2 sentences.
Figures of the two bird species are posted in a sperate file on eClass.
Transcribed Image Text:The yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) is a widespread species along the Atlantic coasts of France and the Iberian Peninsula, the Azores Islands, Madeira, the countries of the Mediterranean basin and the Black Sea. It was formerly considered as a subspecies of Herring Gull (L. argentatus), with which it coexists in some reproductive areas. Only recently L. michahellis has been recognized as a distinct species. Following detailed comparison of the two species, researchers found that the L. michahellis's restricted but dense head-streaking and advanced primary molt in late summer, are not compatible with L. argentatus. Larus michahellis has a proportionately longer, heavier bill and bulkier head and body than L. urgentutus. In addition, L. michahellis's yellow bill has a red gonydeal spot, both colors typically brighter than in L. urgentutus outside breeding season. They also have an orange-red to vermilion orbital ring and yellow legs. DNA research, however, suggests that the yellow-legged gull L. michahellis is actually closest to the great black-backed gull L. marinus and the Armenian gull L. armenicus comparing with L. urgentutus. Therefore, researchers concluded that these similar-looking yellow-legged gull should be recognized as a separate species. Based only on the evidence described above, suggest 1. species concepts that are consistent with the view that the yellow-legged gull L. michahellis represent a separate species; and (note: researchers use multiple lines of evidence to support a conclusion.) 2. a species concept that does NOT support that view (i.e., that supports the historical one- species classification). For each species concept, explain your reasoning in 1 or 2 sentences. Figures of the two bird species are posted in a sperate file on eClass.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Evolutionary Adaptations
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780134580999
Author:
Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:
PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781259398629
Author:
McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:
Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780815344322
Author:
Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781260159363
Author:
Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9781260231700
Author:
Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:
McGraw Hill Education