Source 7: U.N. Resolution 925 - Adopted by the Security Council at its 3388th meeting, on 8 June 1994 "... Noting with the gravest concern the reports indicating that acts of genocide have occurred in Rwanda and recalling in this context that genocide constitutes a crime punishable under international law, Reiterating its strong condemnation of the ongoing violence in Rwanda and, in particular, the systematic killing of thousands of civilians, Expressing its outrage that the perpetrators of these killings have been able to operate and continue operating within Rwanda with impunity..." 20 1. According to the text, is what happened in Rwanda a "genocide" or "acts of genocide"? uthor, 2. Why might the U.N. refer to the events of Rwanda as "acts of genocide" rather than a "genocide"?

icon
Related questions
Question

Pls help with questions 1 AND 2. Thanks!

Source 7: U.N. Resolution 925 - Adopted by the Security Council at its 3388th meeting, on 8 June 1994
66
"... Noting with the gravest concern the reports indicating that acts of genocide have occurred in Rwanda
and recalling in this context that genocide constitutes a crime punishable under international law,
Reiterating its strong condemnation of the ongoing violence in Rwanda and, in particular, the systematic
killing of thousands of civilians,
genocide woul
Expressing its outrage that the perpetrators of these killings have been able to operate and continue
operating within Rwanda with impunity..."
pon
1. According to the text, is what happened in Rwanda a "genocide" or "acts of genocide"?
he author,
stop the
2. Why might the U.N. refer to the events of Rwanda as "acts of genocide" rather than a "genocide"?
According to the author, what did Western officials fail to do? Why
Transcribed Image Text:Source 7: U.N. Resolution 925 - Adopted by the Security Council at its 3388th meeting, on 8 June 1994 66 "... Noting with the gravest concern the reports indicating that acts of genocide have occurred in Rwanda and recalling in this context that genocide constitutes a crime punishable under international law, Reiterating its strong condemnation of the ongoing violence in Rwanda and, in particular, the systematic killing of thousands of civilians, genocide woul Expressing its outrage that the perpetrators of these killings have been able to operate and continue operating within Rwanda with impunity..." pon 1. According to the text, is what happened in Rwanda a "genocide" or "acts of genocide"? he author, stop the 2. Why might the U.N. refer to the events of Rwanda as "acts of genocide" rather than a "genocide"? According to the author, what did Western officials fail to do? Why
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer