Residents of two districts, Oz and Wonderland, initially fall into two types: blue (B) and red (R). In Oz, there are 500 blue residents and 1000 red residents, while in Wonderland there are 1000 blue residents and 500 red residents. Blue residents earn a regular passive income of YB = 12,000, while red residents' passive income is Y₁ = 2,000 due to their lower initial endowments. Both districts provide a local public good for their residents, G. Utility is given by V₁ = 4Y (G+)-G² for i= B, R. The cost of the local public good per resident is C = 23G-8, everywhere. Provision of this good takes place at the local government level, with the amount of provision chosen by majority vote within each district. (b) In this post-migration equilibrium, what amounts of local public good would be provided in each location? Show all workings. (c) Show that the decentralisation theorem holds, contrasting the uniform provision level that would be chosen by a central planner with the locally determined provision levels found in part (b)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
AutoSave Off HU
File Home
Paste
Clipboard
Page 1 of 1
Insert Design Layout
Calibri (Body) ✓11 A A Aa A E
A
BI U ab x₂ x² A
✓
Font
V
50 words m
Type here to search
Accessibility: Investigate
Document1 - Word
References Mailings Review
S
Paragraph
Search
↓
IT
View
¶
S
Help
AaBbCcDc AaBbCcDc AaBbC AaBbcct AaB
¶ Normal
1 No Spac... Heading 1
Heading 2
Title
Styles
Residents of two districts, Oz and Wonderland, initially fall into two types: blue (B) and red
(R). In Oz, there are 500 blue residents and 1000 red residents, while in Wonderland there
are 1000 blue residents and 500 red residents. Blue residents earn a regular passive income
of YB = 12,000, while red residents' passive income is Y₁ = 2,000 due to their lower initial
endowments. Both districts provide a local public good for their residents, G. Utility is given
by Vi
23G-8, everywhere. Provision of this good takes place at the local government level, with
the amount of provision chosen by majority vote within each district.
į = 4Y₁ (G + ¹) − G² for i = B, R. The cost of the local public good per resident is C =
(b) In this post-migration equilibrium, what amounts of local public good would be provided in each
location? Show all workings.
(c) Show that the decentralisation theorem holds, contrasting the uniform provision level that would
be chosen by a central planner with the locally determined provision levels found in part (b)
SHAMU T. (2035000)
S
Focus
BA
DEI
Find
Replace
Select
Editing
ST
13
O
Dictate
V
A
Voice
Comments
Editor
Share
Reuse
Files
X
Editor Reuse Files
+ 100%
12:39
05/06/2023
Transcribed Image Text:AutoSave Off HU File Home Paste Clipboard Page 1 of 1 Insert Design Layout Calibri (Body) ✓11 A A Aa A E A BI U ab x₂ x² A ✓ Font V 50 words m Type here to search Accessibility: Investigate Document1 - Word References Mailings Review S Paragraph Search ↓ IT View ¶ S Help AaBbCcDc AaBbCcDc AaBbC AaBbcct AaB ¶ Normal 1 No Spac... Heading 1 Heading 2 Title Styles Residents of two districts, Oz and Wonderland, initially fall into two types: blue (B) and red (R). In Oz, there are 500 blue residents and 1000 red residents, while in Wonderland there are 1000 blue residents and 500 red residents. Blue residents earn a regular passive income of YB = 12,000, while red residents' passive income is Y₁ = 2,000 due to their lower initial endowments. Both districts provide a local public good for their residents, G. Utility is given by Vi 23G-8, everywhere. Provision of this good takes place at the local government level, with the amount of provision chosen by majority vote within each district. į = 4Y₁ (G + ¹) − G² for i = B, R. The cost of the local public good per resident is C = (b) In this post-migration equilibrium, what amounts of local public good would be provided in each location? Show all workings. (c) Show that the decentralisation theorem holds, contrasting the uniform provision level that would be chosen by a central planner with the locally determined provision levels found in part (b) SHAMU T. (2035000) S Focus BA DEI Find Replace Select Editing ST 13 O Dictate V A Voice Comments Editor Share Reuse Files X Editor Reuse Files + 100% 12:39 05/06/2023
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Taxes And Equity
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education