Researchers developed a new method of voice recognition that was thought to be an improvement over an existing method. The data available below are based on results of their research. Does the evidence suggest that the new method has a different proportion of errors than the existing​ method?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Topic Video
Question

Researchers developed a new method of voice recognition that was thought to be an improvement over an existing method. The data available below are based on results of their research. Does the evidence suggest that the new method has a different proportion of errors than the existing​ method? Use the α=0.01 level of significance.

Contingency Table of the Data
New Method
Did Not
Recognize Word
(failure)
Recognized
Word
(success)
Recognized Word
(success)
Did Not Recognize Word
(failure)
9385
360
Existing Method
378
26
Print
Done
Transcribed Image Text:Contingency Table of the Data New Method Did Not Recognize Word (failure) Recognized Word (success) Recognized Word (success) Did Not Recognize Word (failure) 9385 360 Existing Method 378 26 Print Done
Researchers developed a new method of voice recognition that was thought to be an improvement over an existing method. The data available below are based on results of their research. Does the evidence suggest that the new method has a
different proportion of errors than the existing method? Use the a = 0.01 level of significance.
Click the icon to view the data in a contingency table.
.....
Let p, represent the proportion of errors for the new method and p2 represent the proportion of errors for the existing method. What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
O A. Ho: P1 = P2
H1: P1 > P2
B. Họ: P1 # P2
H1: P1 = P2
C. Ho: P1 = P2
H1: P1 # P2
D. Ho: P1 = P2
H1:P1 <P2
Calculate test statistic.
xổ =
(Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Identify the P-value.
The P-value is
(Round to three decimal places as needed.)
What is the conclusion of the test?
A. Reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of errors for the new method and the proportion of errors for the existing method are different.
B. Do not reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of errors for the new method is greater than the proportion of errors for the existing method.
C. Reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of errors for the new method is less than the proportion of errors for the existing method.
O D. Do not reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of errors for the new method and the proportion of errors for the existing method are different.
Transcribed Image Text:Researchers developed a new method of voice recognition that was thought to be an improvement over an existing method. The data available below are based on results of their research. Does the evidence suggest that the new method has a different proportion of errors than the existing method? Use the a = 0.01 level of significance. Click the icon to view the data in a contingency table. ..... Let p, represent the proportion of errors for the new method and p2 represent the proportion of errors for the existing method. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? O A. Ho: P1 = P2 H1: P1 > P2 B. Họ: P1 # P2 H1: P1 = P2 C. Ho: P1 = P2 H1: P1 # P2 D. Ho: P1 = P2 H1:P1 <P2 Calculate test statistic. xổ = (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Identify the P-value. The P-value is (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is the conclusion of the test? A. Reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of errors for the new method and the proportion of errors for the existing method are different. B. Do not reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of errors for the new method is greater than the proportion of errors for the existing method. C. Reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of errors for the new method is less than the proportion of errors for the existing method. O D. Do not reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of errors for the new method and the proportion of errors for the existing method are different.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Sample space, Events, and Basic Rules of Probability
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman