Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment​ (with magnets) group and the sham​ (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed​ populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts​ (a) and​ (b) below.     Treatment Sham

icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment​ (with magnets) group and the sham​ (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed​ populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts​ (a) and​ (b) below.
 
 
Treatment
Sham
 
μ
μ1
μ2
n
13
13
x
0.48
0.41
s
0.76
1.42
a.  Use a
0.05
significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
 
What are the null and alternative​ hypotheses?
 
 
A.
H0​:
μ1=μ2
H1​:
μ1>μ2
 
B.
H0​:
μ1<μ2
H1​:
μ1≥μ2
 
C.
H0​:
μ1=μ2
H1​:
μ1≠μ2
 
D.
H0​:
μ1≠μ2
H1​:
μ1<μ2
The test​ statistic, t, is
nothing.
​(Round to two decimal places as​ needed.)
The​ P-value is
nothing.
​(Round to three decimal places as​ needed.)
State the conclusion for the test.
 
 
Reject
Fail to reject
the null hypothesis. There
 
is not
is
sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are​ larger?
 
Since the
 
sample mean
sample standard deviation
for those treated with magnets is
 
less than
equal to
greater than
the sample mean for those given a sham​ treatment, it
 
is not
is
valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger.
b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
 
nothing<μ1−μ2<nothing
​(Round to three decimal places as​ needed.)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.