Q3: Without doing additional calculations, explainwhat would happen to the shape of the Lorenz curveand inequality in 2012 if households in and below the15th percentile received cash transfers from thegovernment. 1201008060402020406080100120Share of Pd Horizontal (Value) AxisPerfect equality line- Cumulative share of income in 2011 (%)- Cumulative share of income in 2012 (%)Cumulitive Share of Income

Given that:- Lorenz curve( Grey colored) of 2012 If:- First 15 % people are given cash assistance by…

Q3: Without doing additional calculations, explain what would happen to the shape of the Lorenz curve and inequality in 2012 if households in and below the 15th percentile received cash transfers from the government.

Q3: Without doing additional calculations, explain what would happen to the shape of the Lorenz curve and inequality in 2012 if households in and below the 15th percentile received cash transfers from the government.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

1. What is the relationship between a Lorenz curve and a Gini coefficient? Give some examples of how Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients can be used as summary measures of equality and inequality in a nation's distribution of income.
The table below shows the share of income going to each quintile of the income distribution for a nation in 1960 and 2010. Use this data to calculate what the points on a Lorenz curve would be, and sketch the Lorenz curve. The purple line represents 1960. The green line represents 2010. Share of income received 1960 2010 Bottom 20% 10% 5% Bottom 40% 30% 10% Bottom 60% 45% 30% Bottom 80% 75% 60% All 100% 100% |100% Provide your answer below: 110 100- -90 -80 (90,0) -70 (100, 70) -60 Perfect Equality (100,50 Year 2010 -50 (80,50) Year 1960 40 (70, 30) 30- (50, 20) 20 (90, 20) 10 (60, 10) 80 100 Income Quintiles 20 40 60 -10 Cumulative Share of Income
A Lorenz curve is a graph whose axes measure the: a. total amount of income in dollars on one axis and the total number of individuals or families receiving that income or a lower one on the other. b. percentage of people (10 percent, 20 percent, etc.) on one axis and the percentage of total income received by the lowest 10 percent, the lowest 20 percent, etc., on the other. c. number of individuals or families receiving a certain income on one axis and the percentage of the total population represented by that number on the other. d. number of individuals or families in different occupations on one axis and the median income received in that occupation on the other. e. income classes (e.g., $0 to $1999 and $2000 to $3999) on one axis and the percentage of individuals or families in each such income class on the other.
7: 8: Cumulative Percentage of Family Income 100 80 60 40 20 0 A 20 B A Lorenz Curve B 60 80 Cumulative Percentage of Families 40 Which point shows that 20% of families earn 40% of total income? 100
How does the Gini ratio relate to the Lorenz curve? Why can’t the Gini ratio exceed 1? What is implied about the direction of income inequality if the Gini ratio declines from 0.42 to 0.35? How would one show that change of inequality in the Lorenz diagram?
Using the above Lorenz Curve, answer the following questions. . . Approximately what percentage of the income does the richest 20% of Country B earn? Approximately what percentage of the income does the poorest 20% of Country A earn? If the government of Country B increased the progressivity of income taxes, would its Lorenz Curve move closer to the 45-degree reference line, closer to Country A's Lorenz Curve, or not move at all?
An economy's Lorenz Curve reveals that an economy's highest income quintile has 65% of the economy's income while the lowest income quintile only has 5% of the economy's income. Solely based on this Lorenz Curve, is the distribution of income fair? Why or why not?
The $1.4 billion trick to make us accept income inequality Lotteries take money from the poor and redistribute it unequally. The poor, the uneducated, and minorities play the lottery the most, and it takes a big chunk of their income Source: The Huffington Post, January 12, 2016 If the news clip is correct, how does a lottery change the distribution of income? Draw two Lorenz curves to ilustrate your answer. Lotteries result in the distribution of income Draw the Lorenz curve in a country that does not have lotteries. Label it Before Draw the Lorenz curve for the country after the introduction of lotteries. Label it After >> To reposition the label click on the cross by the label box and dragging it 100 80 60 40- 20 Cumulative percentage of income 100 20 40 60 00 Cumulative percentage of households >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question G
Below is a Lorenz Curve for a given country. Suppose its government cuts spending on Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and other aids to the poor. Show how the spending cuts would affect income inequality by drawing the new Lorenz Curve.
For Question 7 please refer to the chart below of the Lorenz Curve for Paraguay and Germany for 2014: Percent of Total Income Paraguay -Germany Percent of Total Population Based on the table above, which of the following is true; Paraguay has a greater degree of Income Inequality Germany has a lower Gini-Coefficient Paraguay has a higher Gini-Coefficient Germany has a greater degree of Income Inequality
Poverty profiles can play an important role in understanding poverty and formulating poverty reduction policies. Provide some specific examples to illustrate how poverty can be constructed and how they can be utilized to design policies
Please answer 1, 2, and 3! Susan is a single mother with three children. She can earn $8 per hour and works up to 2,000 hours per year. However, if she does not earn any income at all, she will receive government benefits totaling $16,000 per year. For every $1 of income she earns, her level of government support will be reduced by $1. The table below is patterned after Table 15.8 from the text. Number of Work Hours Earnings from Work Government Benefits Total Income 2000 $16,000 $0 $16,000 1600 $16,000 1200 $16,000 800 $16,000 400 $3200 $12,800 $16,000 0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Complete the table. Is this program an example of a poverty trap? Explain your answer. If this program is an example of a poverty trap, how can this program be altered to avoid this problem?