Q1. Consider the adverse selection model, where the ability of each worker, 0, can be 1, 2 or 5. Workers observe their own abilities, but firms only observe the overall distribution of probabilities (1/3, 1/6, 1/2). Suppose that the reservation value is r(0) = 0.5+0.50. (a) What is the range of wages, for which all workers accept the competitive wage? What is expected productivity in this case? What is the range of possible wages for which a firm hires a random worker? Will there be a functioning labor market in this case? (b) What is the range of wages, for which no workers accept the competitive wage? (c) What is the range of wages, for which only lowest type workers accept the competitive wage? What is expected productivity in this case? What is the range of possible wages for which a firm hires a random worker in this case? Will there be functioning labor market? 2140

Q1. Consider the adverse selection model, where the ability of each worker, 0, can be 1, 2 or 5. Workers observe their own abilities, but firms only observe the overall distribution of probabilities (1/3, 1/6, 1/2). Suppose that the reservation value is r(0) = 0.5+0.50. (a) What is the range of wages, for which all workers accept the competitive wage? What is expected productivity in this case? What is the range of possible wages for which a firm hires a random worker? Will there be a functioning labor market in this case? (b) What is the range of wages, for which no workers accept the competitive wage? (c) What is the range of wages, for which only lowest type workers accept the competitive wage? What is expected productivity in this case? What is the range of possible wages for which a firm hires a random worker in this case? Will there be functioning labor market? 2140

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that Lizzo's utility function U is given by U = w.53, where w is wealth. Lizzo has wealth of £21,500 but faces a probability of getting ill and being left with only £11,180. She has an 0.8 probability of being well and a 0.2 probability of being ill.
(13) there are two states of the world next period. State 1 occurs with probability Tt. The individual has a utility function U(C)=In(C) and a subjective discount factor of 0.8. The utility maximising individual chooses consumption in the first period of 1.8 units. In the second period, consumption in state 1 is 2.5, and consumption in state 2 is 2. if the price of the contingent claim in state 1 divided by the price of the contingent price in state 2 equals 0.2, the calculate what n equals
Question 3 Consider the following airline capacity allocation problem with buy-up. The total capacity is 100.There are three classes. All class demands follow normal distribution. The fare prices and demand statistics are given as follows: Class Fare Mean Std. Dev. 1 1000 17 6 2 900 45 15 3 500 90 20 Suppose that if a class 3 demand is rejected booking, each individual has a probability of 0.3 to become a class 2 demand; and if a class 2 demand is rejected booking, each individual has a probability of 0.2 to become a class 1 demand. The airline company needs to determine the nested protection levels. Use @risk simulation optimization tofind the optimal decisions. (Please round all the simulated numbers and solutions to the nearest integer.)
If your worker works hard there is a 3/5 possibility that revenues will be $150 and a 2/5 probability that revenues will be $50. If she works at a lower level of effort, there is a 50% chance of each revenue outcome. Working hard costs her $6. Working moderately costs $3. Her outside utility is zero. She is risk-neutral, with utility equal to W - C , where W is the wage and C is the Cost of Effort (3 or 6 depending on whether she works with low or high effort, resp.) If you could contract for effort, would it be profitable to induce high effort? Explain why. What would your profits be? If you cannot contract for effort, find an incentive-compatible pay scheme that will induce high effort. Set up the incentive and participation constraints and find the z (payment when revenue is 150) and y (payment when revenue is 50) where both are exactly satisfied. Would it be profitable to use this scheme? Why? Now suppose that y can never be negative. What incentive compatible scheme will give…
If U(w) w^1/2, wh-100 and wl=36. Let the reservation utility be 7. Further, let p=1/2. Calculate the maximum cost of effort for which the tenant is willing to accept the contract. Further, if the intercept of the ICC is 14, calculate the probability of obtaining the low output when no effort is exerted.
Unemployment There is a continuum of workers with identical probabilities λ of being fired each period when they are employed. With probability µ ∈ (0, 1), each unemployed worker receives one offer to work at wage w drawn from the cumulative distribution function F(w). If he accepts the offer, the worker receives the offered wage each period until he is fired. With probability 1 − µ, an unemployed worker receives no offer this employed and zero otherwise. There is no unemployment compensation. Each worker regards U as fixed and constant over time in making his decisions. a. For fixed U, write the Bellman equation for the worker. Argue that his optimal policy has the reservation wage property. b. Given the typical worker’s policy (i.e., his reservation wage), display a difference equation for the unemployment rate. Show that a stationary unemployment rate must satisfy c. Define a stationary equilibrium. d. Describe how to compute a stationary…
Typed and correct answer please. I will rate accordingly. Please do it correct. Most impo
V7 Consider a owner-manager problem in which πgross = 2e + ε [manager has control over e, ε are factors outside of manager’s control, ε~N(0,σ2 )] The owner pays the manager a salary of s out of the gross profits. Manager’s cost of effort = e2 /2. Manager has constant risk aversion utility function. σ 2 = 4 A = 1 a) What is the first-best outcome for manager utility, manager effort, and net profits of the owner? b) Now consider that the owner cannot observe manager effort and offers a salary tied to gross profits: s(πgross) = a + b πgross What is the second-best outcome for manager utility, manager effort, and net profits of the owner?
i need the answer quickly
Consider the representative consumer who decides consumption and leisure. Theenvironment is the same as in Lecture 5. Keep the same notation. The preference is givenby U (C,L) = αln C + (1 −α) ln L. Assume h = 1, i.e., the time endowment is one day.(a) Write down the utility maximization problem.(b) Derive the demand for consumption and the supply for labour.(c) Suppose the non-wage income π −T increases while the wage rate w falls at the sametime. The size of the changes can be different. Determine the effects on consumptiondemand and labour supply (i.e., leisure demand). Use the indifference map to explainyour results in terms of income and substitution effects for the following cases:(i) The increase in π −T exactly cancels out the drop in w, i.e., |∆ (π −T)|= |∆w|.(ii) The increase in π −T is greater than the drop in w, i.e., |∆ (π −T)|> |∆w|.(iii) The increase in π −T is smaller than the drop in w, i.e., |∆ (π −T)|< |∆w|.(d) Suppose the utility function is Cobb-Douglas: U…
1
Suppose there exist n = 1000 firms that seek to gain access to a small niche market that is regulated. Suppose that one firm will obtain access and that will get that firm an additional R = $50,000 in profits. Each firm already receives $1 million in profits from other ventures. a. Suppose the probability of winning the rents is linear in investment, each firm has an equal chance of winning and they are all risk-neutral. How much will each firm invest in rent-seeking? Are the rents fully dissipated? b. Suppose instead that the probability of winning changes with the amount invested in rent-seeking, so that each firm’s odds of gaining access are π(n,I) = I1/2 /n. Is the probability of winning increasing or decreasing in investment? Are there diminishing returns to rent-seeking? c. How much will each firm invest in rent-seeking? Are the rents fully dissipated, less than fully dissipated, or more than fully dissipated?