Please write your own example of a 2-way ANOVA (either 3x2 or 2x2), making an interesting research question and plausible results. Be sure to clearly identify the variables, draw a graph of the results, and write an interpretation that clearly explains the main effects and interaction. Please ensure that your example has plausible interaction effect. Include the number of participants in your description. In reporting your results, be sure to include reasonable made-up F values (with matching degrees of freedom), p-values that fit the results of your proposed study and create a visual display of the results. (Please note that you are not expected to come up with the data and conduct analyses. You just need to write a reasonable APA statement - as in the example provided) Here is an example: In a follow-up study led by psychologist Andrea Samson and James Gross, 150 participants looked at photographs of upsetting things such as car accidents, corpses and dangerous animals. They were instructed to either say nothing about the images, use good-natured humour focusing on the absurdity of life or the human condition, or use mean-spirited humour. The experimenters offered examples of each type of response to help coach the subjects; given a picture of a snake with its prey, for instance, “Looks like someone's bitten off more than they can chew” exhibits positive humour, whereas “Nourishing my future handbag” has a negative spin. Additionally, participants were classified as either low or high empathy based on personality measures before the experiment was conducted, and completed measures of emotion afterwards. DV: Positive Emotion (ranging from positive to negative) IVs: Humour Type (Good natured vs Mean spirited ), Empathy (Low vs High) There was a significant main effect for humour type F(2, 144) = 6.23, p < .01, such thatthose who made benevolent jokes about the images reported more positive emotions afterwards than those who laughed mockingly at the pictures or did not say anything. There was no significant main effect for empathy, F(1, 144) = 1.87, p > .05. Finally, there was a significant interaction between humour type and empathy F(2, 144) = 4.22, p < .05, where the effect of humour type was considerably more pronounced for those high on empathy, such that they experienced more positive emotions than those low on empathy when using positive humour, and more negative emotions than those low on empathy when using negative humour, but did not differ in the neutral condition.
Please write your own example of a 2-way ANOVA (either 3x2 or 2x2), making an interesting research question and plausible results. Be sure to clearly identify the variables, draw a graph of the results, and write an interpretation that clearly explains the main effects and interaction. Please ensure that your example has plausible interaction effect. Include the number of participants in your description. In reporting your results, be sure to include reasonable made-up F values (with matching degrees of freedom), p-values that fit the results of your proposed study and create a visual display of the results.
(Please note that you are not expected to come up with the data and conduct analyses. You just need to write a reasonable APA statement - as in the example provided)
Here is an example:
In a follow-up study led by psychologist Andrea Samson and James Gross, 150 participants looked at photographs of upsetting things such as car accidents, corpses and dangerous animals. They were instructed to either say nothing about the images, use good-natured humour focusing on the absurdity of life or the human condition, or use mean-spirited humour. The experimenters offered examples of each type of response to help coach the subjects; given a picture of a snake with its prey, for instance, “Looks like someone's bitten off more than they can chew” exhibits positive humour, whereas “Nourishing my future handbag” has a negative spin. Additionally, participants were classified as either low or high empathy based on personality measures before the experiment was conducted, and completed measures of emotion afterwards.
DV: Positive Emotion (
IVs: Humour Type (Good natured vs Mean spirited ), Empathy (Low vs High)
There was a significant main effect for humour type F(2, 144) = 6.23, p < .01, such thatthose who made benevolent jokes about the images reported more positive emotions afterwards than those who laughed mockingly at the pictures or did not say anything. There was no significant main effect for empathy, F(1, 144) = 1.87, p > .05. Finally, there was a significant interaction between humour type and empathy F(2, 144) = 4.22, p < .05, where the effect of humour type was considerably more pronounced for those high on empathy, such that they experienced more positive emotions than those low on empathy when using positive humour, and more negative emotions than those low on empathy when using negative humour, but did not differ in the neutral condition.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
