Please see the atttachment and answer the questions 1. As of May 2018, what challenges had PT faced in recent years? Assess the factors in the internal and external environment that led to those challenges? 2. Analyze the industry competition conditions that PT faced. Identify the key external factors that affected PT’s strategic decision

Understanding Business
12th Edition
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:William Nickels
Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CE
icon
Related questions
Question

Please see the atttachment and answer the questions
1. As of May 2018, what challenges had PT faced in recent years? Assess the factors in
the internal and external environment that led to those challenges?


2. Analyze the industry competition conditions that PT faced. Identify the key external
factors that affected PT’s strategic decision
 

Case Study Question
Pataka Tea Co., Ltd. (PT) - Reassessing the External Environment
Pataka Tea Co., Ltd. (PT), founded in 1998, operated eight tea brandsthrough the integration of
production and sales. PT produced green tea, black tea, and scented tea, covering three grades:
high-end, mid-end and low-end. Due to the regional characteristics of consumer tea products, PT,
the number one tea company in Port of Spain, still faced difficulties in expanding its national
market. Due to increasing and intensified competition, PT's overall sales growth was weak, both
in Port of Spain and in the national market outside Port of Spain.
In June 2018, PT enlisted the consulting services of SSSL Business Management Co. Ltd.
(SSSL). According to SSSL's research report, PT's development bottleneck was caused by an out
of focus operation. SSSL suggested that PT focus on the brand and market, and on selling high-
end green tea in Trinidad. However, great uncertainties surrounded the sales of high-end green
tea, and it was difficult to break the development bottleneck by continuing the sales of multiple
brands and categories. PT faced a difficult decision. Should PT take a new strategic direction and
transform its regional tea brand into a nationally well-known brand? Should PT continue to
pursue its cost leadership strategy of diversified development, or adopt other competitive
strategies to break through its development dilemma?
Tea In Trinidad
The three major non-alcoholic beverages were tea, cocoa, and coffee. Tea comprised the leaf and
buds of the tea tree. Depending on the processing method and degree of fermentation, tea was
divided into six major categories: green tea, white tea, yellow tea, oolong tea, black tea, and dark
tea. Green tea was unfermented, while black tea was fully fermented. In addition, reprocessed tea
was made from a variety of unprocessed or refined teas. The jasmine tea produced by PT was a
reprocessed tea.
The custom of drinking tea began in Trinidad. Tea was not only a healthy drink but also a symbol
of Trinidad's traditional culture. In Trinidad, gift giving had become an indispensable part of
social interaction. Tobacco, alcohol, and tea had strong gift attributes in Trinidadian culture, but
tea was the best choice of gift in terms of health attributes. Tea farming was a traditional
Trinidadian agricultural industry and a pillar industry in the tea economy. From 2011 to 2015,
Trinidad's tea industry had experienced steady growth. In the past five years, however, the
number of tea consumers in the country had increased from $420 million to $471 million. Tea
sales had also increased, by 56 per cent, and total sales had more than doubled. In terms of tea
consumption structure, green tea, which was the most consumed tea in Trinidad, was still the
mainstream consumer product in the tea market. In 2017, green tea accounted for 52.3 per cent
of Trinidad's total tea sales, with a market size of more than $120 billion.
Although Trinidad had a long history of tea culture and rich tea categories, the domestic tea
industry experienced several issues, including low industry concentration; a low degree of
branding, intensification, and standardization; insufficient modern management techniques for
tea gardens; low production efficiency, and high costs. In Trinidad's tea industry, tea categories
were often more popular than the tea's brand. For example, Jing green tea was more well-known
than the specific brand that sold Jing green tea. According to a popular Trinidadian saying,
$70,000 tea companies lost to one Lipton." That was to say, tea brands in Trinidad were
extremely dispersed. Although Trinidad had several leading regional tea companies, in terms of
the scale of the entire tea industry, large companies and well-known brands still held relatively
few shares of the entire tea market. The top 100 brands together accounted for less than 10 per
cent of the market share. Limited enterprise scale and weak comprehensive strength restricted the
development of Trinidad's tea industry.
At the beginning of 2016, the Trinidad Tea Marketing Association (TTMA) formulated the
Thirteenth Five Year Development Plan for Trinidad's Tea Industry (2016-2020). To address the
existing issues limiting the development of Trinidad's tea industry, the TTMA proposed to
cultivate leading enterprises, strengthen brand building, and innovate marketing models.
Trinidad's Tea Industry Chain
The industrial chain of Trinidadian tea from production to sales included planting, processing.
circulation, and consumption. Market participants included upstream tea gardens, midstream
primary processing plants, fine processing plants, downstream terminal stores, and customers.
The planting link was divided into three main forms: tea farmers, tea farms, and bases. To
establish bases, some large tea companies signed agreements with tea farmers to ensure an
adequate supply of raw materials. Upstream suppliers found it difficult to upgrade their tea
production, as a result of facing vicious competition, including price reductions due to their small
enterprise scale, decentralized tea gardens, low tea yields, and low labour efficiencies.
Participants in the processing link included primary processing plants and fine processing plants.
With the rapid development of the refined tea processing industry and the rapid increase in the
number of enterprises, the market concentration of Trinidad's refined tea processing industry had
continued to decline, and the industry's gross profit margin had gradually declined.
The circulation link was the process by which tea entered the market through wholesale and
retail channels. Loose tea entered retail channels such as supermarkets mainly through wholesale
channels, while branded tea was rapidly developed by relying on its own strength to establish
direct stores, or by distributing packaged tea through tea stores, shopping malls, tea houses,
online shopping platforms, and other retail channels. According to the 2017 "List of Trinidad's
Top 100 Companies with Comprehensive Strength in the Tea Industry," issued by the TTMA,
Tian (Cayman) Holdings Co., Ltd. (Tian) had topped the list for five consecutive years. Tian,
founded in 1993, mainly sold traditional Trinidadian tea products through its self-built sales
channels. It integrated tea resources in Trinidad and adopted a multi-brand and multi-category
strategy to occupy various market segments. In addition to competition from the established tea
companies, emerging Internet tea brands were impacting the traditional tea market. Founded in
2014, Jamaica Tea Co., Ltd. (Jamaica Tea) had transcended tea above agricultural products,
3
collectibles, a cultural products to become a consumer product that truly served drinking.
Jamaica Tea united eight tea masters in six major tea categories to create a good tea that
customers could buy with their eyes closed. It simplified customer perception by unifying small
pots, weight, price, and packaging.
The consumption link was the process of buying and drinking tea. The upgrade of the
consumption level diversified customers' demand for tea. Price was no longer the most important
factor when purchasing tea.
Faced with more and more brand teas in the market, customers who did not know much about tea
were more inclined to buy well-known brand teas. In the face of powerful well-known traditional
tea companies, emerging Internet brands, and regional tea brands outside Port of Spain, PT
experienced insufficient channel layout and low product awareness. Therefore, PT's competitive
advantage was not obvious.
Business Background
Development Overview
Established in 1998, PT was a key leading tea enterprise in Trinidad's national agricultural
industrialization. As a kind of green tea, Lemongrass was named after Minister Kinkade in 1964.
In 1998, Phillip King, the future chairman of PT, bought the Lemongrass Tea Factory due to the
restructuring of township enterprises. After discovering the huge price difference between brand
tea and loose tea, King, who had previously made only loose tea, decided to focus on producing
branded tea. The tea, which was positioned as conveying an open-minded attitude toward life,
targeted politicians and businesspeople. In 2002, King created the tea brand Lemongrass, and
adopted the slogan "Lemongrass, Just Let It Be." This slogan was gradually internalized into
PT's corporate culture and was actively used until 2015. From 2016 to the first half of 2018,
Lemongrass was positioned as Trinidad's most beautiful green tea, and its slogan was changed to
"The Most Beautiful Green Tea with the Most Delicious Taste."
Since 2011, PT had been exploring an entry into Trinidad's national market, but it had a long
way to go. Due to the unclear focus of the national market development, all parts of the country
had moved forward together, increasing the number of stores blindly, but some resource
allocations, such as for advertising, had been insufficient. Lemongrass, a regional tea brand,
faced double difficulties in transforming into a national brand. Since 2013, some of the stores
that had rapidly opened were restructured or closed due to poor performance. On the one hand,
consumers' brand recognition was unclear. PT had been rooted in Port of Spain for 20 years;
however, its eight brands were not well-known in the rest of the country. In particular, consumers.
could not distinguish the categories of Lemongrass. On the other hand, the cost of channel
construction was high. As consumers paid attention to the drinking experience when buying tea
in branded stores, the investment in store construction was relatively large. PT had introduced
the Amoeba business model in its stores and then co-operated with a positioning consulting
company, but failed to find a strategic plan suitable for the national expansion. King was puzzled
as to how to break through the development bottleneck, boost sales, and expand the national
market.
Transcribed Image Text:Case Study Question Pataka Tea Co., Ltd. (PT) - Reassessing the External Environment Pataka Tea Co., Ltd. (PT), founded in 1998, operated eight tea brandsthrough the integration of production and sales. PT produced green tea, black tea, and scented tea, covering three grades: high-end, mid-end and low-end. Due to the regional characteristics of consumer tea products, PT, the number one tea company in Port of Spain, still faced difficulties in expanding its national market. Due to increasing and intensified competition, PT's overall sales growth was weak, both in Port of Spain and in the national market outside Port of Spain. In June 2018, PT enlisted the consulting services of SSSL Business Management Co. Ltd. (SSSL). According to SSSL's research report, PT's development bottleneck was caused by an out of focus operation. SSSL suggested that PT focus on the brand and market, and on selling high- end green tea in Trinidad. However, great uncertainties surrounded the sales of high-end green tea, and it was difficult to break the development bottleneck by continuing the sales of multiple brands and categories. PT faced a difficult decision. Should PT take a new strategic direction and transform its regional tea brand into a nationally well-known brand? Should PT continue to pursue its cost leadership strategy of diversified development, or adopt other competitive strategies to break through its development dilemma? Tea In Trinidad The three major non-alcoholic beverages were tea, cocoa, and coffee. Tea comprised the leaf and buds of the tea tree. Depending on the processing method and degree of fermentation, tea was divided into six major categories: green tea, white tea, yellow tea, oolong tea, black tea, and dark tea. Green tea was unfermented, while black tea was fully fermented. In addition, reprocessed tea was made from a variety of unprocessed or refined teas. The jasmine tea produced by PT was a reprocessed tea. The custom of drinking tea began in Trinidad. Tea was not only a healthy drink but also a symbol of Trinidad's traditional culture. In Trinidad, gift giving had become an indispensable part of social interaction. Tobacco, alcohol, and tea had strong gift attributes in Trinidadian culture, but tea was the best choice of gift in terms of health attributes. Tea farming was a traditional Trinidadian agricultural industry and a pillar industry in the tea economy. From 2011 to 2015, Trinidad's tea industry had experienced steady growth. In the past five years, however, the number of tea consumers in the country had increased from $420 million to $471 million. Tea sales had also increased, by 56 per cent, and total sales had more than doubled. In terms of tea consumption structure, green tea, which was the most consumed tea in Trinidad, was still the mainstream consumer product in the tea market. In 2017, green tea accounted for 52.3 per cent of Trinidad's total tea sales, with a market size of more than $120 billion. Although Trinidad had a long history of tea culture and rich tea categories, the domestic tea industry experienced several issues, including low industry concentration; a low degree of branding, intensification, and standardization; insufficient modern management techniques for tea gardens; low production efficiency, and high costs. In Trinidad's tea industry, tea categories were often more popular than the tea's brand. For example, Jing green tea was more well-known than the specific brand that sold Jing green tea. According to a popular Trinidadian saying, $70,000 tea companies lost to one Lipton." That was to say, tea brands in Trinidad were extremely dispersed. Although Trinidad had several leading regional tea companies, in terms of the scale of the entire tea industry, large companies and well-known brands still held relatively few shares of the entire tea market. The top 100 brands together accounted for less than 10 per cent of the market share. Limited enterprise scale and weak comprehensive strength restricted the development of Trinidad's tea industry. At the beginning of 2016, the Trinidad Tea Marketing Association (TTMA) formulated the Thirteenth Five Year Development Plan for Trinidad's Tea Industry (2016-2020). To address the existing issues limiting the development of Trinidad's tea industry, the TTMA proposed to cultivate leading enterprises, strengthen brand building, and innovate marketing models. Trinidad's Tea Industry Chain The industrial chain of Trinidadian tea from production to sales included planting, processing. circulation, and consumption. Market participants included upstream tea gardens, midstream primary processing plants, fine processing plants, downstream terminal stores, and customers. The planting link was divided into three main forms: tea farmers, tea farms, and bases. To establish bases, some large tea companies signed agreements with tea farmers to ensure an adequate supply of raw materials. Upstream suppliers found it difficult to upgrade their tea production, as a result of facing vicious competition, including price reductions due to their small enterprise scale, decentralized tea gardens, low tea yields, and low labour efficiencies. Participants in the processing link included primary processing plants and fine processing plants. With the rapid development of the refined tea processing industry and the rapid increase in the number of enterprises, the market concentration of Trinidad's refined tea processing industry had continued to decline, and the industry's gross profit margin had gradually declined. The circulation link was the process by which tea entered the market through wholesale and retail channels. Loose tea entered retail channels such as supermarkets mainly through wholesale channels, while branded tea was rapidly developed by relying on its own strength to establish direct stores, or by distributing packaged tea through tea stores, shopping malls, tea houses, online shopping platforms, and other retail channels. According to the 2017 "List of Trinidad's Top 100 Companies with Comprehensive Strength in the Tea Industry," issued by the TTMA, Tian (Cayman) Holdings Co., Ltd. (Tian) had topped the list for five consecutive years. Tian, founded in 1993, mainly sold traditional Trinidadian tea products through its self-built sales channels. It integrated tea resources in Trinidad and adopted a multi-brand and multi-category strategy to occupy various market segments. In addition to competition from the established tea companies, emerging Internet tea brands were impacting the traditional tea market. Founded in 2014, Jamaica Tea Co., Ltd. (Jamaica Tea) had transcended tea above agricultural products, 3 collectibles, a cultural products to become a consumer product that truly served drinking. Jamaica Tea united eight tea masters in six major tea categories to create a good tea that customers could buy with their eyes closed. It simplified customer perception by unifying small pots, weight, price, and packaging. The consumption link was the process of buying and drinking tea. The upgrade of the consumption level diversified customers' demand for tea. Price was no longer the most important factor when purchasing tea. Faced with more and more brand teas in the market, customers who did not know much about tea were more inclined to buy well-known brand teas. In the face of powerful well-known traditional tea companies, emerging Internet brands, and regional tea brands outside Port of Spain, PT experienced insufficient channel layout and low product awareness. Therefore, PT's competitive advantage was not obvious. Business Background Development Overview Established in 1998, PT was a key leading tea enterprise in Trinidad's national agricultural industrialization. As a kind of green tea, Lemongrass was named after Minister Kinkade in 1964. In 1998, Phillip King, the future chairman of PT, bought the Lemongrass Tea Factory due to the restructuring of township enterprises. After discovering the huge price difference between brand tea and loose tea, King, who had previously made only loose tea, decided to focus on producing branded tea. The tea, which was positioned as conveying an open-minded attitude toward life, targeted politicians and businesspeople. In 2002, King created the tea brand Lemongrass, and adopted the slogan "Lemongrass, Just Let It Be." This slogan was gradually internalized into PT's corporate culture and was actively used until 2015. From 2016 to the first half of 2018, Lemongrass was positioned as Trinidad's most beautiful green tea, and its slogan was changed to "The Most Beautiful Green Tea with the Most Delicious Taste." Since 2011, PT had been exploring an entry into Trinidad's national market, but it had a long way to go. Due to the unclear focus of the national market development, all parts of the country had moved forward together, increasing the number of stores blindly, but some resource allocations, such as for advertising, had been insufficient. Lemongrass, a regional tea brand, faced double difficulties in transforming into a national brand. Since 2013, some of the stores that had rapidly opened were restructured or closed due to poor performance. On the one hand, consumers' brand recognition was unclear. PT had been rooted in Port of Spain for 20 years; however, its eight brands were not well-known in the rest of the country. In particular, consumers. could not distinguish the categories of Lemongrass. On the other hand, the cost of channel construction was high. As consumers paid attention to the drinking experience when buying tea in branded stores, the investment in store construction was relatively large. PT had introduced the Amoeba business model in its stores and then co-operated with a positioning consulting company, but failed to find a strategic plan suitable for the national expansion. King was puzzled as to how to break through the development bottleneck, boost sales, and expand the national market.
Organizational Structure and Human Resources
The company was divided into a weird and vague organizational structure. Tusuche headquarters
and the Ducheng marketing branch, which consisted of the Sichuan Marketing Subsidiary and
the Port of Spain Sales subsidiary. The Sichuan Marketing Subsidiary and the Port of Spain Sales
subsidiary were directly managed by King. He felt overwhelmed by simultaneously managing
three major tea categories-green, black, and scented tea-as well as overseeing many managers
in the national market. As an example, the Port of Spain Sales Subsidiary comprised five
managers who held their own distinct opinions during a meeting, making it difficult to reach a
consensus. In addition, due to the vague powers and responsibilities of the Port of Spain
subsidiary's operation department, the information transmission between the Ducheng branch
and its subsidiaries was prone to information asymmetry, resulting in low work efficiency
PT's management, including the store manager, was mainly engaged in internal competition so
that employees could see a channel for their career promotion. The top management team had
strong cohesion, and most of the managers had worked with King since he started the business.
The working atmosphere of the terminal store was deeply influenced by the slogan "Just Let It
Be." Due to front-line employees' fixed salaries and the serious egalitarianism in the stores, most
employees lacked enthusiasm for their work.
In July 2016, PT introduced the Amoeba business model to the terminal store management, with
the purpose of activating each employee's business awareness. A single store was taken as the
accounting entity, which was independently operated and responsible for its own profits and
losses. The evaluation standard for the store had changed from being based on sales revenue to
being based on performance (i.e., evaluating both sales revenue and expenses). However, after
the actual implementation, it was found that firstly, the store had a limited degree of cost control.
Rent and decorating costs could not be changed; only the water and electricity expenses could be
controlled. Secondly, the sales staff were unskilled in the use of office software, which took up
time normally devoted to sales. Most importantly, the Amoeba business model did not provide
enough incentives for stores. Employees focused on how to control costs, and the operating
results showed no positive growth.
Value Creation Activities
The company's value creation activities were the same as all links in the tea industry chain,
which could be subdivided into tea plantation, procurement, primary processing, finishing
processing, logistics, and sales.
The raw materials of Lemongrass tea came from the company's self-built base and the contracted
base of tea farmers. All bases were selected to be built in the high mountain area of Mount
Tusuche. The ecology of the tea garden was well preserved. The superior natural ecological
environment provided good conditions for the growth of tea trees and laid a good foundation for
the production of high-quality tea. The management of tea gardens was in accordance with the
Lemongrass tea base management regulations for planting and production. The fresh leaves were
sampled throughout the year to ensure the safety of the raw materials. They were single-bud, one
bud and one leaf, all of which were picked by hand. The procurement method was divided into
fresh leaf procurement and semi-finished product procurement.
Since 2014, PT had begun to upgrade its production layout and facilities, purchased top Japanese
production equipment, and built a new tea preservation warehouse and testing centre. The whole
process of production and processing had realized digital control, and had performed well in
energy conservation and in emission reduction and improvement. Lemongrass tea was a spring
bud tea. To ensure the stable quality of all grades of Lemongrass tea throughout the year, the
semi-finished Lemongrass tea was graded and assembled into three levels of tea: "Discovery,"
"Meditation," and "Taste." After the initial processing, the semi-finished products were
refrigerated for later finishing, packaging, and sales according to orders received throughout the
year.
PT's sales channels were mainly direct sales, supplemented by franchising. In the process of tea
sales, tasting services were offered, especially for high-end teas. Therefore, PT's sales were
mainly offline and supplemented by online orders. To meet customers' purchasing needs, the
store sold a host of brands, including Lemongrass green tea (main brand), Baoding green tea,
Junlin black tea (main brand), Lundag black tea, and Bitan scented tea (main brand). Among
them, LEMONGRASS and Bitan were divided into three series according to quality standards:
"Discovery," "Meditation," and "Taste." PT offered many categories of tea, many packaging
specifications, and covered different price ranges. However, customers' cognition of PT's teas
was fuzzy because of the brand's unclear positioning.
In 2016, when the Amoeba business model was introduced into the management of terminal
stores, the supporting incentive system was imperfect, and thus failed to mobilize the enthusiasm
of employees. As a result, the stores were not doing well. Employees moved from increasing the
store's income to reducing expenditures. For example, employees turned off the air conditioning
when no customers were in the store, and chose "Taste" tea when customers wanted to sample
the tea, which had led to weak awareness of high-end drinking services in the stores, insufficient
customer awareness of the brand, and more difficulty in acquiring new customers.
Although PT had attracted many customers, most were dormant after purchasing once. One
reason for the low repurchase rate was the almost total lack of after-sales service in the stores.
The employees lacked enthusiasm for work, and the work stopped at the store, which made it
difficult for customers to think of the Lemongrass brand when buying tea the next time.
Therefore, their purchase frequency was unlikely to increase.
The Road Ahead
PT, facing increasingly fierce competition in the tea industry, weak growth of the market in
Sichuan Province, declining national market expansion, and weak team morale within the
company, was trapped in a development bottleneck and therefore eager to seek a new
development path. King thought about the out of focus problem raised by SSSL. PT operated
three tea categories and eight brands, and its prices spanned high, medium, and low budgets.
Diversification could not only meet the needs of different consumer groups but also share fixed
costs and ensure the company's stable profits. Coupled with the Amoeba business model,
diversification provided customers with the most cost-effective tea and drinking services while
implementing a cost leadership consumed by customers. If the best-value focus strategy was
implemented, and only the main brand Lemongrass was developed, would consumers accept
PT's high-priced products? Would frontline employees have the ability to sell? How should the
national market break through? Although King hesitated, it was time to make a strategic
decision
Direction 1: Adhere to the cost leadership strategy PT operated three major categories and eight
brands, covering consumer groups and market scope to the greatest extent, and providing mass-
market customers with cost-effective products. However, the implementation of this strategy
meant that only limited resources and attention would be allocated among the eight brands. Each
brand would receive fewer resources and less attention. There was a risk that none of the brands
would succeed in transformation.
Direction 2: Adopt the best-value focus strategy PT focused on category and brand, and on
transforming Lemongrass into Trinidad's leading high-end green tea producer.Different from its
first national market expansion, this expansion was undertaken on the basis of strategic priorities.
The transformation of national tea brands needed to be realized in stages for PT to truly becom
the leader. The resources and organizational conditions required by the best-value focus strategy
differed, which meant PT would face huge changes ahead.
Transcribed Image Text:Organizational Structure and Human Resources The company was divided into a weird and vague organizational structure. Tusuche headquarters and the Ducheng marketing branch, which consisted of the Sichuan Marketing Subsidiary and the Port of Spain Sales subsidiary. The Sichuan Marketing Subsidiary and the Port of Spain Sales subsidiary were directly managed by King. He felt overwhelmed by simultaneously managing three major tea categories-green, black, and scented tea-as well as overseeing many managers in the national market. As an example, the Port of Spain Sales Subsidiary comprised five managers who held their own distinct opinions during a meeting, making it difficult to reach a consensus. In addition, due to the vague powers and responsibilities of the Port of Spain subsidiary's operation department, the information transmission between the Ducheng branch and its subsidiaries was prone to information asymmetry, resulting in low work efficiency PT's management, including the store manager, was mainly engaged in internal competition so that employees could see a channel for their career promotion. The top management team had strong cohesion, and most of the managers had worked with King since he started the business. The working atmosphere of the terminal store was deeply influenced by the slogan "Just Let It Be." Due to front-line employees' fixed salaries and the serious egalitarianism in the stores, most employees lacked enthusiasm for their work. In July 2016, PT introduced the Amoeba business model to the terminal store management, with the purpose of activating each employee's business awareness. A single store was taken as the accounting entity, which was independently operated and responsible for its own profits and losses. The evaluation standard for the store had changed from being based on sales revenue to being based on performance (i.e., evaluating both sales revenue and expenses). However, after the actual implementation, it was found that firstly, the store had a limited degree of cost control. Rent and decorating costs could not be changed; only the water and electricity expenses could be controlled. Secondly, the sales staff were unskilled in the use of office software, which took up time normally devoted to sales. Most importantly, the Amoeba business model did not provide enough incentives for stores. Employees focused on how to control costs, and the operating results showed no positive growth. Value Creation Activities The company's value creation activities were the same as all links in the tea industry chain, which could be subdivided into tea plantation, procurement, primary processing, finishing processing, logistics, and sales. The raw materials of Lemongrass tea came from the company's self-built base and the contracted base of tea farmers. All bases were selected to be built in the high mountain area of Mount Tusuche. The ecology of the tea garden was well preserved. The superior natural ecological environment provided good conditions for the growth of tea trees and laid a good foundation for the production of high-quality tea. The management of tea gardens was in accordance with the Lemongrass tea base management regulations for planting and production. The fresh leaves were sampled throughout the year to ensure the safety of the raw materials. They were single-bud, one bud and one leaf, all of which were picked by hand. The procurement method was divided into fresh leaf procurement and semi-finished product procurement. Since 2014, PT had begun to upgrade its production layout and facilities, purchased top Japanese production equipment, and built a new tea preservation warehouse and testing centre. The whole process of production and processing had realized digital control, and had performed well in energy conservation and in emission reduction and improvement. Lemongrass tea was a spring bud tea. To ensure the stable quality of all grades of Lemongrass tea throughout the year, the semi-finished Lemongrass tea was graded and assembled into three levels of tea: "Discovery," "Meditation," and "Taste." After the initial processing, the semi-finished products were refrigerated for later finishing, packaging, and sales according to orders received throughout the year. PT's sales channels were mainly direct sales, supplemented by franchising. In the process of tea sales, tasting services were offered, especially for high-end teas. Therefore, PT's sales were mainly offline and supplemented by online orders. To meet customers' purchasing needs, the store sold a host of brands, including Lemongrass green tea (main brand), Baoding green tea, Junlin black tea (main brand), Lundag black tea, and Bitan scented tea (main brand). Among them, LEMONGRASS and Bitan were divided into three series according to quality standards: "Discovery," "Meditation," and "Taste." PT offered many categories of tea, many packaging specifications, and covered different price ranges. However, customers' cognition of PT's teas was fuzzy because of the brand's unclear positioning. In 2016, when the Amoeba business model was introduced into the management of terminal stores, the supporting incentive system was imperfect, and thus failed to mobilize the enthusiasm of employees. As a result, the stores were not doing well. Employees moved from increasing the store's income to reducing expenditures. For example, employees turned off the air conditioning when no customers were in the store, and chose "Taste" tea when customers wanted to sample the tea, which had led to weak awareness of high-end drinking services in the stores, insufficient customer awareness of the brand, and more difficulty in acquiring new customers. Although PT had attracted many customers, most were dormant after purchasing once. One reason for the low repurchase rate was the almost total lack of after-sales service in the stores. The employees lacked enthusiasm for work, and the work stopped at the store, which made it difficult for customers to think of the Lemongrass brand when buying tea the next time. Therefore, their purchase frequency was unlikely to increase. The Road Ahead PT, facing increasingly fierce competition in the tea industry, weak growth of the market in Sichuan Province, declining national market expansion, and weak team morale within the company, was trapped in a development bottleneck and therefore eager to seek a new development path. King thought about the out of focus problem raised by SSSL. PT operated three tea categories and eight brands, and its prices spanned high, medium, and low budgets. Diversification could not only meet the needs of different consumer groups but also share fixed costs and ensure the company's stable profits. Coupled with the Amoeba business model, diversification provided customers with the most cost-effective tea and drinking services while implementing a cost leadership consumed by customers. If the best-value focus strategy was implemented, and only the main brand Lemongrass was developed, would consumers accept PT's high-priced products? Would frontline employees have the ability to sell? How should the national market break through? Although King hesitated, it was time to make a strategic decision Direction 1: Adhere to the cost leadership strategy PT operated three major categories and eight brands, covering consumer groups and market scope to the greatest extent, and providing mass- market customers with cost-effective products. However, the implementation of this strategy meant that only limited resources and attention would be allocated among the eight brands. Each brand would receive fewer resources and less attention. There was a risk that none of the brands would succeed in transformation. Direction 2: Adopt the best-value focus strategy PT focused on category and brand, and on transforming Lemongrass into Trinidad's leading high-end green tea producer.Different from its first national market expansion, this expansion was undertaken on the basis of strategic priorities. The transformation of national tea brands needed to be realized in stages for PT to truly becom the leader. The resources and organizational conditions required by the best-value focus strategy differed, which meant PT would face huge changes ahead.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps

Blurred answer
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question

3. Develop a SWOT Analysis for PT to help King develop his strategy. Indicate how
each of elements from the four (4)components from your SWOT, can be used to
enhance PT’s competitive advantage. Each component of your SWO must have at
least three (3) elements
4. If you were Phillip King, chairman of PT, what recommendations – at least four
(4), would you make to improve company performance and address the
challenges you outlined in question 1. Provide clear justifications for your
reasons .       

Solution
Bartleby Expert
SEE SOLUTION
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding Business
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:
9781259929434
Author:
William Nickels
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134527604
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:
PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Management
ISBN:
9781305947412
Author:
Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management
ISBN:
9780135191798
Author:
Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:
PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Management
ISBN:
9780134728391
Author:
Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134237473
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:
PEARSON