Philipsen and Katriel tell us about different ways that cultural groups have conceptualized "communication." One thing we know for sure is that communication is not believed to accomplish the same goals or be useful for the same things in each cultural community, and that different communities develop different ideas about what "kinds" of communication exist. Philipsen and Katriel do research in some communities in the U.S. to explore two different forms of communication that exist in those communities "small talk" and "real communication" which are believed by those communities to accomplish two very different sets of conversation goals. 3. Philipsen points out that there are implications for our identity in the way we talk and that speaking in a particular way is, in part, how we maintain our association with particular cultural communities. This is evident when some members of the community Philipsen studys leave to go to school and return speaking differently. The community takes this as a sign that the person has changed and wonders if they "belong" anymore. In this way, the way we speak is deeply tied to our cultural communities. What do you think the consequences of this are for debates about the need for everyone to speak "Standard English" rather than "Black English," or "Latino English." Are we not only asking people to speak differently, but perhaps abandon their culture or communities?
3. Philipsen points out that there are implications for our identity in the way we talk and that speaking in a particular way is, in part, how we maintain our association with particular cultural communities. This is evident when some members of the community Philipsen studys leave to go to school and return speaking differently. The community takes this as a sign that the person has changed and wonders if they "belong" anymore. In this way, the way we speak is deeply tied to our cultural communities. What do you think the consequences of this are for debates about the need for everyone to speak "Standard English" rather than "Black English," or "Latino English." Are we not only asking people to speak differently, but perhaps abandon their culture or communities?
Philipsen and Katriel are the scholars in field of intercultural communication who contributed to understanding of how different cultural groups conceptualize communication. Their work highlights the idea that communication is not a universal, one-size-fits-all concept and that it varies across cultural communities.
Cultural Variability in Communication: Philipsen and KatRiel's studies underscore the concept that exceptional cultural businesses have distinct methods of information and verbal exchange. Communication is shaped by cultural values, norms, and practices, and what is considered effective or suitable verbal exchange can range widely from one subculture to some other.
Cultural Goals of Communication: Different cultural companies may additionally have awesome goals for verbal exchange. For example, some cultures can also prioritize keeping concord and averting conflict, whilst others can also prioritize directness and assertiveness. The objectives of verbal exchange, which include conveying information, constructing relationships, or expressing feelings, can also fluctuate throughout cultures.
Types of Communication: Different cultural groups expand ideas about what types of communication exist. This includes not only verbal conversation but also nonverbal communication, including body language, gestures, and facial expressions. The way humans interpret and use nonverbal cues can vary broadly throughout cultures. For example, a gesture that is taken into consideration advantageous in a single lifestyle may be offensive in another.
Contextual and Situational Factors: Communication is deeply motivated by the cultural context and the particular scenario in which it takes place. Different cultures can also have varying norms and expectations for communication depending at the context, which includes formal vs. casual, public vs. private, or professional vs. private.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps