nere S1 Consider the market for trees in a public forest, illustrated in the figure to the right, D, is marginal private benefit. Trees are an example of a common resource Suppose that the use of trees in a public forest generates a negative externality of $75 per unit. If so, then according to the figure, the optimal quantity of trees in a public forest for society is response as an integer.) units. (Enter your

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
**Title: Understanding the Market for Trees in Public Forests**

**Introduction:**
In this educational module, we will explore the market dynamics for trees in a public forest. We will examine the relationship between marginal private cost and marginal private benefit, specifically focusing on the impact of externalities.

**Text Content:**

Consider the market for trees in a public forest, illustrated in the figure to the right, where \( S_1 \) is the marginal private cost and \( D_1 \) is the marginal private benefit.

Trees are an example of a **common resource**.

Suppose that the use of trees in a public forest generates a negative externality of $75 per unit.

If so, then according to the figure, the optimal quantity of trees in a public forest for society is \(\_\_\_\) units. (Enter your response as an integer.)

**Graph Explanation:**

*The Graph:*
- The graph on the right shows the relationship between the price of trees in a public forest per ton and the quantity of trees.
- The x-axis represents the "Quantity of trees in a public forest" ranging from 0 to 13 units.
- The y-axis represents the "Price of trees in a public forest (per ton)" ranging from $0 to $600.

*Lines on the Graph:*
- The upward-sloping line labeled \( S_1 \) represents the marginal private cost.
- The downward-sloping line labeled \( D_1 \) represents the marginal private benefit.
- The intersection of these two lines indicates the market equilibrium without considering externalities.

**Conclusion:**

The graph and accompanying text provide a framework for understanding how external costs, like negative externalities, impact the optimal consumption of common resources. By adjusting for the $75 externality, one can determine the socially optimal quantity of trees needed in the public forest.
Transcribed Image Text:**Title: Understanding the Market for Trees in Public Forests** **Introduction:** In this educational module, we will explore the market dynamics for trees in a public forest. We will examine the relationship between marginal private cost and marginal private benefit, specifically focusing on the impact of externalities. **Text Content:** Consider the market for trees in a public forest, illustrated in the figure to the right, where \( S_1 \) is the marginal private cost and \( D_1 \) is the marginal private benefit. Trees are an example of a **common resource**. Suppose that the use of trees in a public forest generates a negative externality of $75 per unit. If so, then according to the figure, the optimal quantity of trees in a public forest for society is \(\_\_\_\) units. (Enter your response as an integer.) **Graph Explanation:** *The Graph:* - The graph on the right shows the relationship between the price of trees in a public forest per ton and the quantity of trees. - The x-axis represents the "Quantity of trees in a public forest" ranging from 0 to 13 units. - The y-axis represents the "Price of trees in a public forest (per ton)" ranging from $0 to $600. *Lines on the Graph:* - The upward-sloping line labeled \( S_1 \) represents the marginal private cost. - The downward-sloping line labeled \( D_1 \) represents the marginal private benefit. - The intersection of these two lines indicates the market equilibrium without considering externalities. **Conclusion:** The graph and accompanying text provide a framework for understanding how external costs, like negative externalities, impact the optimal consumption of common resources. By adjusting for the $75 externality, one can determine the socially optimal quantity of trees needed in the public forest.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education